This paper examines the incidence of the corporate income tax using duality theory for a two-sector general equilibrium model in which the economy experiences sector-specific unemployment and perfect capital mobility with a sector-specific rigid-wage in the corporate sector. Utilizing the simple geometry without the complicated mathematical manipulations required in the previous works, we demonstrate that capital always bears more of the corporate tax burden than does labor, while unemployment and national income unambiguously decline.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtkinsonA. B. and StiglitzJ. E., Lectures on Public Economics (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980).
2.
ChangC. H., “A General Disequilibrium Model of Tax Incidence.”Journal of Public Economics26 (February 1985): 123–133.
3.
HarbergerA. C., “The Incidence of Corporate Income Tax.”Journal of Political Economy70 (June 1962): 215–240.
4.
HarrisJ. R. and TodaroM., “Migration, Unemployment and Development: A Two-Sector Analysis.”American Economic Review60 (March 1970): 126–142.
5.
McCoolT., “Wage Subsidies and Distortionary Taxes in a Mobile Capital Harris-Todaro Model.”Economica49 (February 1982): 69–80.
6.
MiyagiwaK., “Corporate Income Tax Incidence in the Presence of Sector-Specific Unemployment.”Journal of Public Economics37 (October 1988): 103–112.
7.
MussaM., “The Two-Sector Model in Terms of Its Dual: A Geometric Exposition.”Journal of International Economics9 (November 1979): 513–526.
8.
NearyJ. P., “On the Harris-Todaro Model with Intersectoral Capital Mobility.”Economica48 (August 1981): 219–234.
9.
WangL. F. S., “Unemployment and the Backward Incidence of Pollution Control.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management18 (May 1990): 292–298.
10.
WoodlandA. D., “A Dual Approach to Equilibrium in the Production Sector in International Trade Theory,”Canadian Journal of Economics10 (February 1977): 50–68.
