The major objective of this paper is to derive a set of optimal decision rules (for asset or inventory management) for a commercial bank operating under uncertain circumstances (subject to stochastic deposit loss). The bank is assumed to be maximizing the expected utility derived from it's net income. This objective is realized by the marginal conditions of the model. It shows how and under what conditions, the banker should expand loans at the expense of securities and/or excess reserves and how he adjusts to de-regulations and how the change in uncertainty about the deposit loss affects him.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AignerDennis J. and BryanW. T., “A Model of Short-Run Bank Behavior.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, February 1971, pp. 97–118.
2.
BaltenspergerE. B.1980, “Alternative Approaches to the Theory of the Banking Firm.” Journal of Monetary Economics, pp. 1–37.
3.
ElyasianiElyas, “The Two Product Banking Firm under Uncertainty.”Southern Economic Journal, April 1983, pp. 1002–17.
4.
HartO. D. and JaffeeD. M., 1974, “On the Application of Portfolio Theory to Depository Financial Intermediaries”, Review of Economic Studies4, pp. 129–147.
5.
HesterDonald and PierceJames. Bank Management and Portfolio behavior. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1975.
6.
KleinM. A., 1971. “A Theory of the Banking Firm”, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, pp. 205–218.
7.
MarkowitzH. M., Portfolio Selection, Efficient Diversification of Investment, N.Y., John Wiley and Sons, 1959.
8.
PringleJ. J., 1973, “A Theory of Banking Firm: A Comment”, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, pp. 990–996.
9.
PringleJ. J.1974, “The Imperfect Market, Model of Commercial Bank Financial Management”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, pp. 69–87.
10.
SandmoA., “On the Theory of Competitive Firm under Price Uncertainty.”American Economic Review, March 1971, pp. 65–73.
11.
SantomeroA. M., “Modeling The Banking Firm: A Survey”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, November 1984, Part 2, pp. 576–616.
12.
TobinJames, 1958, “Liquidity Preference as Behavior Towards Risk”, Review of Economic Studies, 26, 1, pp. 65–86.
13.
TobinJames,. “The Commercial Banking Firm: A Simple Model.”Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1982, 84(4), pp. 495–530.