FriedmanMilton, “The Quantity Theory of Money—A Restatement,” in Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.
2.
LaidlerD., “Misconceptions about the Real Bills Doctrine and the Quantity Theory: A Comment on Sargent and Wallace,”Journal of Political Economy, 92, 1984, pp. 149–155.
3.
McCallumBennett T., “Some Issues Concerning Interest Rate Pegging, Price Level Indeterminacy, and the Real Bills Doctrine,”Journal of Monetary Economics, 17, 1986, pp. 135–160.
4.
MintsLloyd, A History of Banking Theory, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1945.
5.
MintsLloyd, “Open Market Borrowing to Finance the Production of Goods Sold for Future Delivery,”Journal of Political Economy, 31, February 1923, pp. 128–38.
6.
MintsLloyd, “Expansion of Fixed and Working Capital by Open Market Borrowing,”Journal of Political Economy, 31, April 1923, pp. 299–302.
7.
MintsLloyd, “The Elasticity of Banknotes,”Journal of Political Economy, 38, August 1920, pp. 458–71.
8.
MintsLloyd, “Monetary Policy,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 28, May 1946, pp. 60–69.
9.
MintsLloyd, “Monetary Policy and Stabilization,”American Economic Review (Supplement), 41, May 1951, pp. 188–193.
10.
MintsLloyd and others, “Monetary Policy: Discussion,”American Economic Review (Supplement), 43, May 1953, pp. 54–60.
11.
MintsLloyd, Monetary Policy for a Competitive Society, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950.
12.
PatinkinDon, “The Chicago Tradition, the Quantity Theory, and Friedman,”Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, I(1), 1969, pp. 46–70. Reprinted in Studies in Monetary Economics, New York: Harper and Row, 1972.
13.
SargentT. J. and WallaceNeil, “The Real-Bills Doctrine Versus the Quantity Theory: A Reconsideration,”Journal of Political Economy, 90, 1982, pp. 1212–1236.
14.
SimonsHenry, “Banking and Currency Reform,” manuscript, November 1933.