ArrowK. J., Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing, Markham Publishing Company, Chicago, 1971.
2.
BernoulliD., “Exposition of a New Theory in the Measurement of Risk,”Econometrica, XXII (1954), pp. 23–26 (English translation of a Latin text first appeared in St. Petersburg in 1738).
3.
BorchK. H., “A Note on Uncertainty and Indifference Curves,”Review of Economic Studies, XXXVI (1969), pp. 1–4.
4.
BowlesS.KendrickD., Notes and Problems in Microeconomic Theory, Markham Publishing Company, Chicago, 1970.
5.
BuhlmannH., Mathematical Methods in Risk Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1970.
6.
ChipmanJ. S., “The Ordering of Portfolios in Terms of Mean and Variance,”Review of Economic Studies, XL (1973), pp. 167–190.
7.
FeldsteinM. S., “Mean-Variance Analysis in the Theory of Liquidity Preference and Portfolio Selection,”Review of Economic Studies, XXXVI (1969), pp. 5–13.
8.
FriedmanM. and SavageL. J., “The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk,”Journal of Political Economy, LVI (1948), pp. 279–304.
9.
HadarJ. and RussellW. R., “Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects,”American Economic Review, LIX (1969), pp. 25–34.
10.
HersteinI. N. and MilnorJ., “An Axiomatic Approach to Measurable Utility,”Econometrica, XXI (1953), pp. 291–297.
11.
HotellingH., “Edgeworth's Taxation Paradox and the Nature of Demand and Supply Functions,”Journal of Political Economy, XL (1932), pp. 517–616.
12.
HouthakkerH. S., “Additive Preferences,”Econometrica, XXVIII (1960), pp. 244–257.
13.
JensenM. C., “Risk, the Pricing of Capital Assets, and the Evaluation of Investment Portfolios,”Journal of Business, XLII (1969), pp. 167–247.
14.
KendallM. G. and StuartA., The Advanced Theory of Statistics: Distribution Theory, Volume I, (third edition), Hafner Publishing Company, New York, 1969.
15.
KendallM. G. and StuartA., The Advanced Theory of Statistics: Inference and Relationship, Volume II, (Second edition), Hafner Publishing Company, New York, 1967.
16.
LauL. J., “Duality and the Structure of Utility Functions,”Journal of Economic Theory, I (1970), pp. 374–396.
17.
MalinvaudE., Statistical Methods of Econometrics, Second Edition (translated by SilveyA.), American Elsevier Publishing Company, New York, 1970.
18.
MarkowitzH. G., Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification on Investments, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1959.
19.
MossinJ., “Optimal Multiperiod Portfolio Policies,”Journal of Business, XLI (1968), pp. 215–229.
20.
Von NeumannJ. and MorgensternO., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Second Edition, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1947.
21.
PollakR. A., “Additive Von-Neumann-Morgenstern Utility Functions,”Econometrica, XXXV (1967), pp. 485–494.
22.
PollakR., “Homogeneous Von-Neumann-Morgenstern Utility Functions,”International Economic Review, XI (February 1970), pp. 117–130.
23.
PrattJ. W., “Risk Aversion in the Small and Large,”Econometrica, XXXII (1964), pp. 122–136.
24.
RichterM. K., “Cardinal Utility, Portfolio Selection, and Taxation,”Review of Economic Studies, XXVII (1960), pp. 152–166.
25.
RoyR., “La Distribution du Revenue Entre Les Divers Biens,”Econometrica, VI (1947), pp. 205–225.
26.
SamuelsonP. A., “Using Full Duality to Show that Simultaneous Additive Direct and Indirect Utilities Implies Unitary Price Elasticity of Demand,”Econometrica, XXXIII (1965), pp. 781–796.
27.
SamuelsonP. A., “The Fundamental Approximation Theorem of Portfolio Analysis in Term of Means, Variances, and Higher Central Moments,”Review of Economic Studies, XXXVII (1970), pp. 537–542.
28.
TobinJ., “Comment on Borch and Feldstein,”Review of Economic Studies, XXXVI (1969), pp. 14–15.
29.
TsiangS. C., “The Rationale of the Mean-Standard Deviation Analysis, Skewness Preference, and the Demand for Money,”American Economic Review, LXII (1972), pp. 354–371.
30.
TuncerY., A Consumption-oriented Portfolio Analysis Based on Considerations of Skewness, Kurtosis, and Other Higher Central Moments, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 1972.
