ArchibaldG. C., “The State of Economic Science,”British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, May, 1959.
2.
ArchibaldG. C., “Discussion,” Problems of Methodology, American Economic Review, Vol. LIII, No. 2, May, 1963, pp. 227–229.
3.
BaranPaul, The Political Economy of Growth. N. Y., Marzani and Munsell, 1955.
4.
KennethE. Boulding, “A New Look at Institutionalism,”American Economic Review, March, 1957.
5.
BrownRobert, Explanation in Social Science, Chicago, Aldine Pub. Co., 1964.
6.
NormanF. Byers, “Economic, Logical and Mathematical Systems,”Social Research, Vol. 26, No. 4, Winter, 1959, pp. 379–402.
7.
AlfredH. Conrad and JohnR. Meyer, The Economics of Slavery and Other Studies in Econometric History, Chicago, Aldine, 1964, Ch. 1, 2.
8.
JamesS. Duesenberry, “The Methodological Basis of Economic Theory,”Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 36, Nov., 1964, p. 362.
9.
FriedmanMilton, Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago, U. of Chicago, 1953.
10.
HutchinsonT. W., The Significance and Basic Postulates of Economic Theory, London, Macmillan, 1938.
11.
HutchinsonT. W., Positive Economics and Policy Objectives, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard Univ. Press, 1964.
12.
KaufmanFelix, The Methodology of the Social Sciences, N.Y., Oxford Univ. Press, 1944.
13.
KeynesJohn Neville, The Scope and Method of Political Economy, N. Y., Kelly, 1955.
14.
KnightFrank, “Institutionalism and Empiricism in Economics,”American Economic Review, Vol. XLII, May, 1952, p. 45.
15.
KoopmansTjalling, Three Essays on the State of Economic Science, N. Y., McGraw-Hill, 1957.
16.
LangeOskar, “The Scope and Method of Economics,”Review of Economic Studies, 1945.
17.
MachlupFritz, “The Problem of Verification in Economics,”Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 22, July, 1955, pp. 1–21.
18.
MachlupFritz, “Professor Samuelson on Theory and Realism,”American Economic Review, Vol. LIV, No. 5, Sept., 1964, pp. 733–736.
19.
MachlupFritz, Rejoinder to Hutchison's Comments, Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 23, April, 1956.
20.
MelitzJack, “Friedman and Machlup on the Significance of Testing Economic Assumptions,”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. LXXIII, Feb., 1965, No. 1, pp. 37–60.
21.
NagelErnest, “Assumptions in Economic Theory,”American Economic Review, Vol. LIII, No. 2, May, 1963, pp. 211–219.
AndreasG. Papandreou, Economics as a Science, Chicago, Lipincott, 1958.
24.
AndreasG. Papandreou, “Theory Construction and Empirical Meaning in Economics,”American Economic Review, Vol. LIII, No. 2, May, 1963, pp. 205–210.
25.
ReichenbachHans, The Rise of Scientific Philosophy, Berkeley, Univ. of California, 1953.
26.
RobbinsLionel, An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, London, Macmillan, 1949.
27.
RobinsonJoan, Economic Philosophy, N. Y., Doubleday, 1964.
28.
SamuelsonPaul, Foundations of Economic Analysis, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard Univ. Press, pp. 1–12.
29.
SamuelsonPaul, “Discussion,” Problems of Methodology, American Economic Review, Vol. LIII, No. 2, May, 1963, pp. 231–236; “Comments” by Garb, Lerner, and Massey and reply by Samuelson, American Economic Review, Vol. LV, No. 5, Part 1, Dec., 1965, pp. 1150–1172.
30.
TintnerGerhard, “Methodology of Mathematical Economics and Econometrics,”Encyclopedia of Unified Sciences, forthcoming.