Symposia in the Journal of Economic Literature and the Journal of Economics Education have considered what should be taught in the introductory economics classroom. Scaling that question up to the major as a whole involves a discussion of the competencies that a graduate with an economics major ought to have. Within this discussion, relatively less attention is devoted to what and how economic theory should be taught to economics majors. Here, we focus on a class in intermediate microeconomic theory. We discuss how the content and emphasis of the course could be modified to (a) more closely reflect what economists do, (b) respond to—though not determined by—the changing interests of economics majors, and (c) be more inclusive. We argue that instructors could take a more intuitive, problem-centered approach to teaching microeconomic theory and prioritize discussion of strategic interactions, social preferences, incomplete information, and common pool resource problems.
AndreoniJ.MillerJ. (2002). Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica, 70(2), 737–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00302
4.
AngristJ.AzoulayP.EllisonG.HillR.LuS. F. (2017). Economic research evolves: Fields and styles. American Economic Review, 107(5), 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20171117
5.
BayerA.RouseC. E. (2016). Diversity in the economics profession: A new attack on an old problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(4), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.4.221
6.
BeckerW. E. (2003). How to Make Economics the Sexy Social Science (From Chronicle of Higher Education). Southern Economic Journal, 70(1), 195–198. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/1061640
7.
BowlesS.CarlinW. (2020). What students learn in economics 101: Time for a change. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(1), 176–214. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191585
8.
BowlesS.CarlinW. (2021). Shrinking capitalism: Components of a new political economy paradigm. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 37(4), 794–810. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grab029
9.
BowlesS.CarlinW.HallidayS. D.SubramanyamS. (forthcoming). What do we think an economist should know? A machine learning investigation of research and intermediate-level texts. History of Political Economy.
10.
BowlesS.CarlinW.SubramanyamS. (2025). Civil society comes of age in economics: Tracking a century of research. Economics Letters, 246(4), Article 112070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2024.112070
11.
BowlesS.HallidayS. D. (2022). Microeconomics: Competition, conflict, and coordination. Oxford University Press.
12.
BurkholderE.SalehiS.SackeyfioS.Mohamed-HindsN.WiemanC. (2022). Equitable approach to introductory calculus-based physics courses focused on problem solving. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(2), Article 020124. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020124
13.
CarrollL. (1893). Sylvie and Bruno concluded. Macmillan.
CohenA. J.StockW.WollaS. (2024). Introduction to JEE symposium on “What should go into the only economics course students will ever take?”. The Journal of Economic Education, 55(2), 107–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2023.2289969
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
20.
DixitA. K.SkeathS.ReileyD. H. (2014). Games of strategy. W. W. Norton and Company.
21.
DvorakT.HallidayS. D.O’HaraM.SwobodaA. (2019). Efficient empiricism. The Journal of Economic Education, 50(3), 242–257.
22.
ElyR. T.AdamsT. S.LorenzM. O.YoungA. A. (1919). Outlines of economics. Macmillan.
23.
EmersonT. L. N.McGoldrickK. (2024). Failure, withdrawals, and retakes in intermediate microeconomics. The Journal of Economic Education, 55(4), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2024.2364860
EricssonA.PoolR. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise. Random House.
26.
FrancisD. V.HardyB. L.JonesD. (2022). Black economists on race and policy: Contributions to education, poverty and mobility, and public finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 60(2), 454–493. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20211686
27.
FrankR. (2017). Microeconomics and behavior. McGraw Hill.
HamermeshD. S. (2013). Six decades of top economics publishing: Who and how?Journal of Economic Literature, 51(1), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.1.162
30.
HarsanyiJ. C. (1995). A new theory of equilibrium selection for games with complete information. Games and Economic Behavior, 8(1), 91–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-8256(05)80018-1
31.
HarsanyiJ. C.SeltenR. (1988). A general theory of equilibrium selection in games. MIT Press.
32.
HimanshuLanjouwP.SternN. (2018). How lives change: Palanpur, India, and development economics. Oxford University Press.
33.
HoskinsonA.-M.CaballeroM. D.KnightJ. K. (2013). How can we improve problem solving in undergraduate biology? Applying lessons from 30 Years of physics education research. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-09-0149
34.
JenkinsC.LaneS. (2019). Employability skills in UK economics degrees. Economics Network.
35.
JonesA.SchuhmannP.SoquesD.WitmanA. (2020). So you want to go to graduate school? Factors that influence admissions to economics PhD programs. The Journal of Economic Education, 51(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2020.1731385
KarlanD.ListJ. A. (2007). Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. American Economic Review, 97(5), 1774–1793. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.5.1774
38.
KoopmansT. C. (2013). Three Essays on the State of economic science. Martino Fine Books.
39.
KorzybskiA. (2000). A non-aristotelian system and its importance for rigour in mathematics and physics. In Science and sanity: An introduction to non-aristotelian systems and semantics (5th ed., pp. 745–761). Institute of General Semantics.
40.
KuhnT. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
41.
LanjouwP.SternN. (1998). Economic development in Palanpur over five decades. Oxford University Press.
LozanoJ. M.BofarullI.WaddockS.Prat-i-PubillQ. (2020). Avoiding the iron cage of business school rankings. Higher Education Policy, 33(1), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-018-0107-7
MarshallA. (1920). Principles of economics (8th ed.). Palgrave MacMillan.
46.
MayA. M.McGarveyM. G.GustafsonC. R.MienoT. (2021). Gender, environmental issues and policy: An examination of the views of male and female economists. Ecological Economics, 182(2), Article 106877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106877
47.
MayA. M.McGarveyM. G.KuceraD. (2018). Gender and European economic policy: A survey of the views of European economists on contemporary economic policy. Kyklos, 71(1), 162–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12166
48.
MayA. M.McgarveyM. G.WhaplesR. (2014). Are disagreements among male and female economists marginal at best? A survey of aea members and their views on economics and economic policy. Contemporary Economic Policy, 32(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12004
49.
MeeganD. V. (2010). Zero-sum bias: Perceived competition despite unlimited resources. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(1), 191. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00191
50.
Mendez-CarbajoD.DellachiesaA. (2023). Choice of data visualization tool: FRED or spreadsheets?International Review of Economics Education, 44(1), Article 100275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2023.100275
51.
MillerK.CallaghanK.McCartyL. S.DeslauriersL. (2021). Increasing the effectiveness of active learning using deliberate practice: A homework transformation. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), Article 010129. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010129
52.
MorraB. (2018). The chemistry connections challenge: Encouraging students to connect course concepts with real-world applications. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(12), 2212–2215. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00137
53.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Integrated postsecondary education data system (IPEDS). U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/
54.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2021). Integrated postsecondary education data system (IPEDS). Earned Degrees Conferred, US Department of Education.
55.
NCSES. (2018). Survey of earned doctorates. (National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES), National Science Foundation). https://ncses.nsf.gov/
56.
NCSES. (2023). Survey of earned doctorates. (National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES), National Science Foundation). https://ncses.nsf.gov/
PindyckR. S.RubinfeldD. L. (2017). Microeconomics (9th global). Pearson.
61.
SchellingT. (2006). Micromotives and macrobehavior. W. W. Norton and Company.
62.
SchultzT. W. (1980). Nobel lecture: The economics of being poor. Journal of Political Economy, 88(4), 639–651. https://doi.org/10.1086/260895
63.
SiegfriedJ. J.RaymondJ. E. (1984). A profile of senior economics majors in the United States. The American Economic Review, 74(2), 19–25.
64.
SiegfriedJ. J.SandersonA. R. (2003). Keeping Economics from Becoming a Sexy Social Science. Southern Economic Journal, 70(1), 209–214. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/1061644
StockW. A.SiegfriedJ. J. (2015). The undergraduate origins of PhD economists revisited. The Journal of Economic Education, 46(2), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2015.1015187
VarianH.MelitzM. (2024). Intermediate microeconomics: A modern approach. W. W. Norton and Company.
73.
WargoD. T.VilceanuO. (2011). The new science of learning and why students forget their economics so quickly. The Economics Network. https://doi.org/10.53593/n1300a
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
