EmmettR.2012). The elgar companion to the chicago school of economics. Routledge.
2.
EvenskyJ. (2005). “Chicago smith” versus “kirkaldy smith”. ‘Chicago Smith’ Versus ‘Kirkaldy Smith’” History of Political Economy, 37(2), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-37-2-197
3.
FriedmanM. (1977). Adam Smith’s relevance for today. Challenge, 20(1) March, pp. 6–12.
LiuGloryM. (2020). Rethinking the “Chicago Smith” Problem: Adam Smith and the Chicago School, 1929-1980. Modern Intellectual History, 17(4), 1041–1068.
6.
MedemaS. G. (2014). “Identifying a ‘Chicago School’ of economics: On the origins, evolution, and evolving meanings of a famous brand name. Journal of the History of Economic Thought.
7.
WinchD. (1978). Adam, Smith’s Politics: An essay in historiographic revision. Cambridge University Press.