In Shelby County v. Holder (2013), the U.S. Supreme Court declared unconstitutional Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which required jurisdictions with histories of voter disenfranchisement to receive federal preclearance before altering voting laws. Since Shelby, 1688 polling sites across 13 states have closed. Utilizing a sample of eligible voters from the Current Population Survey, I first predict the likelihood of voting. Then, I analyze how Shelby has influenced the likelihood of ballot box access issues among non-voters. Overall voter turnout is 0.9pp lower in post-Shelby elections. Black eligible voters are 5.4pp less likely to vote after Shelby. However, Shelby is not associated with a higher likelihood of ballot box access issues. While the mechanisms through which Shelby affects voting behavior remain inconclusive, Shelby is significantly associated with widespread voter disenfranchisement. These findings are relevant for policymakers in creating a revised preclearance formula to curb voter disenfranchisement.
AbramowitzA.McCoyJ. (2019). United States: Racial resentment, negative partisanship, and polarization in Trump’s America. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218811309
2.
AnejaA. P.Avenancio-LeónC. F. (2019). Disenfranchisement and Economic Inequality: Downstream Effects of Shelby County v. Holder. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 109, 161-165. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20191085
3.
AngD. (2019). Do 40-year-old facts still matter? Long-run effects of federal oversight under the Voting Rights Act. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(3), 1-53. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20170572
4.
AnsolabehereS.HershE. (2011). Gender, race, age, and voting: A research note APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper. The American Political Science Association.
5.
BagenstosS. R. (2014). Universalism and Civil Rights (with Notes on Voting Rights After Shelby). Yale Law Journal, 123(8), 2838-2876.
6.
BerniniA.FacchiniG.TestaC. (2018). Race, representation and local governments in the US South: the effect of the Voting Rights Act black candidates in municipal elections. The Journal of Law and Economics, 38(2), 367-392.
7.
BullockC. S.HoodM. V. (2006). A Mile‐Wide Gap: The Evolution of Hispanic Political Emergence in the Deep South. Social Science Quarterly, 87(5), 1117-1135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00419.x
8.
BurdenB. C.WichowskyA. (2012). Unemployment and voter turnout APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper. The American Political Science Association.
9.
CascioE. U.WashingtonE. (2014). Valuing the vote: The redistribution of voting rights and state funds following the voting rights act of 1965. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(1), 379-433. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt028
10.
CebulaR. J.DuquetteC. M.BoylanR. (2017a). Panel data analysis of regional differentials in the registered voter turnout rate and the expected benefits of voting for minorities. Atlantic Economic Journal, 45(1), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-016-9527-1
11.
CebulaR. J.PayneJ. E.SaltzI. S. (2017b). Determinants of geographic voter participation rate differentials: The 2014 mid-term election. Atlantic Economic Journal, 45(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-016-9525-3
12.
ChoW. K. T.GimpelJ. G.DyckJ. J. (2006). Residential concentration, political socialization, and voter turnout. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 156-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00377.x
DeSipioL. (2011). Immigrant incorporation in an era of weak civic institutions: Immigrant civic and political participation in the United States. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(9), 1189-1213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211407842
16.
FullmerE. B. (2015). The site gap: Racial inequalities in early voting access. American Politics Research, 43(2), 283-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x14546987
HerronM. C.SmithD. A. (2013). The effects of House Bill 1355 on voter registration in Florida. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 13(3), 279-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440013487387
20.
Jan LeighleyJ.Jonathan NaglerJ. (2016). Latino electoral participation: variations on demographics and ethnicity. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(3), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2016.2.3.08
21.
JoslynN.BilboA.ArndtJ.BergerH.JoslynM. (2020). Distance traveled to polling locations: Are travel costs imposed equally on party members?The Social Science Journal, 57(1), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.12.006
22.
LitmanL. M. (2016). Inventing Equal Sovereignty. Michigan Law Review, 114(7), 1207-1273.
23.
RosenstoneS. J. (1982). Economic adversity and voter turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 26(1), 25-46. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110837
SondheimerR. M.GreenD. P. (2010). Using experiments to estimate the effects of education on voter turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 174-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00425.x
StokerL.JenningsM. K. (1995). Life-cycle transitions and political participation: The case of marriage. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 421-433. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082435
Torres-ReynaO. (2014). Predicted probabilities and marginal effects after (ordered) logit/probit using margins in Stata [PowerPoint slides]. Princeton University: Department of Data & Statistical Services. https://www.princeton.edu/∼otorres/Margins.pdf
WolfingerR. E.RosenstoneS. J.McIntoshR. A. (1981). Presidential and congressional voters compared. American Politics Quarterly, 9(2), 245-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x8100900206
38.
WolfingerN. H.WolfingerR. E. (2008). Family structure and voter turnout. Social Forces, 86(4), 1513-1528. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0031
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
