Teaching Methods in Undergraduate Intermediate Theory,Statistics and Econometrics,and Other Upper-Division Economics Courses: Results From a Sixth National Quinquennial Survey

Abstract

This article is an extension of a recent article published in The American Economist (Asarta et al., 2021) and presents the second report of basic findings from the 2020 online administration of the sixth national quinquennial survey on teaching and assessment methods in economics. Consistent with the results from the first report, we find that “chalk and talk” remains the staple method of instruction across the entire undergraduate economics curriculum. Lessons, activities, and references that address diversity, inclusion, or gender issues are almost never used in intermediate theory, statistics and econometrics, and other upper-division field courses. There has been notable growth in the use of cooperative learning/small-group assignments, as well as in instructor-led and “student(s) with student(s)” discussions over the past 25 years. Overall, however, there have been minimal changes in teaching methods over time.JEL Classifications: A20, A22

Keywords

teaching methods undergraduate economics intermediate theory statistics econometrics upper-division economics courses

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Economic Association . (2020). Best practices for economists: Building a more diverse, inclusive, and productive profession. https://www.aeaweb.org/resources/best-practices

American Economic Association . (2021). Best practices for economists: Working with students. https://www.aeaweb.org/resources/best-practices/working-with-students

Asarta

C. J.

Chambers

Harter

(2021). Teaching methods in undergraduate introductory economics courses: Results from a sixth national quinquennial survey. The American Economist, 66, 18–28.

Asarta

C. J.

Schmidt

(2015). The choice of reduced seat time in a blended course. Internet and Higher Education, 27, 24–31.

Asarta

C. J.

Schmidt

(2017). Comparing student performance in blended and traditional courses: Does prior academic achievement matter? Internet and Higher Education, 32, 29–38.

Becker

Watts

(1996). Chalk and talk: A national survey on teaching undergraduate economics. The American Economic Review, 86, 448–453.

Goffe

W. L.

Kauper

(2014). A survey of principles instructors: Why lecture prevails. The Journal of Economic Education, 45, 360–375.

Haak

D. C.

HilleRisLambers

Pitre

Freeman

(2011). Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science, 332, 1213–1216.

Hussar

Zhang

Hein

Wang

Roberts

Cui

Smith

Bullock Mann

Barmer

Dilig

(2020). The condition of education 2020 (NCES 2020-144). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.

10.

Johnson

Meder

M. E.

(2021). A meta-analysis of technology: Interventions in collegiate economics classes. The Journal of Economic Education, 52, 1–16.

11.

McFarland

Hussar

Zhang

Wang

Hein

Diliberti

Forrest

Cataldi

Bullock Mann

Barmer

(2019). The condition of education 2019 (NCES 2019-144). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.

12.

Mendez-Carbajo

Malakar

L. C.

(2020). Flipping the classroom with econlowdown.org. The Journal of Economic Education, 51, 95–102.

13.

Ongeri

J. D.

(2017). Instruction of economics at higher education: A literature review of the unchanging method of “talk and chalk.” The International Journal of Management Education, 15, 30–35.

14.

Parsad

Lewis

Tice

(2008). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2006–07. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

15.

Qualtrics . (2020). https://www.qualtrics.com.

16.

Rolheiser

Olmstead

Gordon

(2019). Goodbye lecture halls, hello active learning spaces. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Publishing, Education. https://hbsp.harvard.edu/inspiring-minds/goodbye-lecture-halls-hello-active-learning-spaces.

17.

Watts

Becker

W. E.

(2008). A little more than chalk and talk: Results from a third national survey of teaching methods in undergraduate economics courses. The Journal of Economic Education, 39, 273–286.

18.

Watts

Schaur

(2011). Teaching and assessment methods in undergraduate economics: A fourth national quinquennial survey. The Journal of Economic Education, 42(3), 294-309.