The analysis of public policy issues in the classroom can be a powerful tool to help students learn because it encourages students to actively apply classroom material. The television show The Simpsons provides several episodes that revolve around policy issues amenable to examination. Using The Simpsons to provide students with material for analysis has two advantages over traditional sources such as newspapers or magazines. First, a long-running and popular television show effectively engages students in a way traditional sources cannot. Second, the context of an animated television show can help students separate positive economic analysis from normative economic analysis.
BeckerWilliam E.2000. “Teaching Economics in the 21st Century.” Journal of Economic Perspectives14 (Winter): 109–119.
2.
BeckerWilliam E. and WattsMichael. 2001. “Teaching Methods in U.S. Undergraduate Economics Courses.” Journal of Economic Education32 (Summer): 269–279.
3.
BorjasGeorge J.1994. “The Economics of Immigration.” Journal of Economic Literature32 (December): 1667–1717.
4.
CameronBeverly. 1998. “Active and Cooperative Learning Strategies for the Economic Class-92 room.” In Teaching Undergraduate Economics, WalstadWilliam B. and SaundersPhillip (eds). Boston: Irwin-McGraw Hill.
5.
CarlstromCharles T. and RollowChristy D.. 1997. “The Rationing of Transplantable Organs: A Troubled Lineup.” Cato Journal17 (Fall): 163–177.
6.
ConsidineJohn. 2006. “The Simpsons: Public Choice in the Tradition of Swift and Orwell.” Journal of Economic Education37 (Spring): 217–228.
7.
GwartneyJames D., StroupRichard L., SobelRussell S., and MacphersonDavid A.. 2003. Economics: Private and Public Choice, 11th Edition. Mason: Thomson/South-Western..
8.
KennedyPeter E.2000. “Eight Reasons Why Real versus Nominal Interest Rates is the Most Important Concept in Macroeconomics Principles Courses.” American Economic Review90 (May): 81–84.
9.
KleinDaniel B.1999. “Introduction: What Do Economists Contribute?” In What Do Economists Contribute?KleinDaniel B. (ed). New York: New York University Press.
10.
LeetDon, and HouserScott. 2003. “Economics Goes to Hollywood: Using Classic Films and Documentaries to Create an Undergraduate Economics Course.” Journal of Economic Education34 (Fall): 326–32.
11.
MankiwN. Greogry. 2007. Principles of Economics, 4th Edition. Mason: Thomson/SouthWestern.
12.
MartinPhilip. 1995. “Proposition 187 in California.” International Migration Review vol. 29, no. 1 (Spring): 255–263.
13.
MateerG. Dirk. 2004. Economics in the Movies. Mason: Thomson/South-Western.
14.
SextonRobert. 2006. “Using Short Movie and Television Clips in the Economics Principles Class.” Journal of Economic Education37 (Fall): 406–417.
15.
SimpsonCarol M.2001. Copyright for Schools: A Practical Guide. New York: Linworth.
16.
TalabR.S.1999. Commonsense Copyright: A Guide for Educators and Librarians. New York: McFarland.
17.
WattsMichael. 2002. “How Economists Use Literature and Drama.” Journal of Economic Education33 (Fall): 377–386
