ArrowKennethSolowRobertPortneyPaulEdwardE. LearnerRoy RadnerSchumanHoward. 1993. “Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation,”Federal Register, 58(10), January 15, 1993, 4602–4614.
2.
BenekeR. R.1998. “T. W. Schultz and Pamphlet No. 5: The Oleo-Margarine War and Academic Freedom.”Choices, 2nd quarter, pp. 4–8.
3.
BromleyDanielW.1990. “The Ideology of Efficiency: Searching for a Theory of Policy Analysis,”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management19(1): 86–107.
4.
BromleyDanielW.1991. Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public PolicyOxford: Blackwell.
5.
BromleyDanielW.1993. “Regulatory Takings: Coherent Concept or Logical Contradiction?”Vermont Law Review17(3): 647–82.
6.
BromleyDanielW.1995. “Property Rights and Natural Resource Damage Assessment,”Ecological Economics14: 129–35.
7.
BromleyDanielW.1997. “Rethinking Markets,”American Journal of Agricultural Economics79(5): 1383–93.
8.
BromleyDanielW.2006. Sufficient Reason: Volitional Pragmatism and the Meaning of Economic Institutions, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9.
ColanderDavid. 2007. The Making of an Economist, Redux, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
10.
DiamondPeterA.JerryA. Hausman. 1994. Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number better than No Number?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4): 45–64.
11.
FriedmanMilton. 1953. Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
HanemannMichaelW., 1994. Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4): 19–43.
13.
HansenLeeW., (ed.). 1998. Academic Freedom on Trial: 100 Years of Sifting And Winnowing at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
14.
HausmanJerry, (ed). 1993. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, Amsterdam: North Holland.
15.
McCloskeyDonald. 1983. “The Rhetoric of Economics,”Journal of Economic Literature21: 481–517.
16.
OgilvieSheilagh. 2007. “‘Whatever is, is Right’? Economic Institutions in pre-industrial Europe,”Economic History Review, 60(4): 639–684].
17.
PortneyPaulR.1994. “The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care,”The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4): 3–17.
18.
PutnamHilary. 2002. “The Entanglement of Fact and Value,” in: The Collapse of the Fact/Value Distinction, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, chapter 3.
19.
RobbinsLionel. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, London: Macmillan.
20.
RoulacStephenE.MarkO. DotzourChengPingJamesR. Webb. 2005. “Evolving Research Priorities: The Contents of Land Economics.”Land Economics, 81(4): 457–76.
21.
VatnArildDanielW. Bromley. 1994. “Choices Without Prices Without Apologies,”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management26(2): 129–48.