ArrowKenneth. (1963). “Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care,”American Economic Review, 53: 941–64.
2.
AshfordSusan. (1996). “The Publishing Process: The Struggle for Meaning,” in: FrostP.J.TaylorM.S. (Eds), Rhythms of Academic Life: Personal Accounts of Careers in Academia (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage), pp. 119–27.
3.
BedeianArthurG. (2003). “The Manuscript Review Process: The Proper Roles of Authors, Referees, and Editors,”Journal of Management Inquiry, 12: 331–8.
4.
BedeianArthurG. (2004). “Peer Review and the Social Construction of Knowledge in the Management Discipline,”Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3: 198–216.
5.
BerkenkotterCarol. (1995). “The Power and Perils of Peer Review,”Rhetoric Review, 13: 245–8.
CournotAntoineAugustin. [1838] (1960). Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth, trans. BaconNathaniel (New York: Augustus M. Kelly).
DeprezJohanMilbergWill. (2000). “Sidney Weintraub (1914–1983),”A Biographical Dictionary of Dissenting Economists, ed. ArestisP.SawyerM. (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar), pp. 702–9.
10.
EllisonGlenn. (2002). “The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process,”Journal of Political Economy, 110: 947–93.
11.
FerberMarianneTeimanMichelle. (1980). “Are Women Economists at a Disadvantage in Publishing Journal Articles?,”Eastern Economic Journal, 6: 189–93.
12.
FreyBruno. (2003). “Publishing as Prostitution-Choosing between One's Own Ideas and Academic Success,”Public Choice, 116: 205–23.
13.
GansJoshuaShepherdGeorge. (1994). “How are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists,”Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8: 165–79.
14.
HamermeshDaniel. (1994). “Facts and Myths about Refereeing,”Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8: 153–63.
15.
LeblebiciHuseyin. (1996). “The Act of Reviewing and Being a Reviewer,” in: FrostP.J.TaylorM.S. (Eds), Rhythms of Academic Life: Personal Accounts of Careers in Academia (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage), pp. 269–74.
16.
MahoneyMichael. (1977). “Publication Prejudices: An Experimental Study of Confirmatory Bias in the Peer Review System,”Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, pp. 161–75.
17.
PetersDouglasCeciStephen. (1985). “Peer-Review Practices of Psychology Journals: The Fate of Published Articles, Submitted Again,”The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5: 187–255.
18.
PressmanSteven. (2006). Fifty Major Economists, 2nd ed. (London and New York: Routlege).
19.
PressmanSteven. (2007). “Ingrid Rima and Post Keynesian Macroeconomics,” inPost Keynesian Macroeconomics: Essays in Honour of Ingrid Rima, ed. ForstaterM.MongioviG.PressmanS. (London & New York: Routledge), pp. 1–11.
20.
ShepherdGeorge. (Ed.) (1995). Rejected: Leading Economists Ponder the Publication Process (Sun Lakes, AZ: Thomas Horton).
21.
SmythDavid. (1994). “How Not to Get Your Article Published,”Eastern Economic Journal, 20: 471–73.
22.
SpectorPaulE. (1998). “When Reviewers Become Authors: A Comment on the Journal Review Process,”Research Methods Forum, Fall, pp. 1–4.
23.
van LangePaul. (1999). “Why Authors Believe that Reviewers Stress Limiting Aspects of Manuscripts: The SLAM Effect in Peer Review,”Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29: 2550–66.
24.
ZimanJohn. (1968). Public Knowledge: The Social Dimensions of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).