Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Is international outsourcing “efficient” or merely a redistribution of resources from one economic sector to another? This paper looks at this question from the perspectives of: (1) economic theory, which abstracts away from institutions and towards generalized incentives; (2) management theory, which focuses more on institutional issues that economic theory tends to ignore; and (3) a combined perspective within a benefit-cost analysis framework. The paper argues that an evaluation of outsourcing's impacts requires determining how the practice affects overall size of economic output and equity across sectors and countries. A benefit-cost template is developed for considering these questions more systematically.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bahli Bouchaib Rivard Suzanne (2004). “The Great Hollowing-Out Myth,” The Economist, Feb 21: 27–29.

Bahli Bouchaib Rivard Suzanne (2003). “The Information Technology Outsourcing Risk: A Transaction Cost and Agency Theory-Based Perspective,” Journal of Information Technology. September, Vol. 18: 211–221.

Drezner Daniel . (2004). “The Outsourcing Bogeyman,” Foreign Affairs, May/June, Vol. 83, No. 3: 22–34.

Dunning John

(1993). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Wokington, England: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

Egger Hartmut Eggery Peter (2002). “International outsourcing and the productivity of low-skilled labor in the EU” Working Paper, unpublished, April 15, 2002.

→ Feenstra Robert

Hanson

Gordon

(1999). “The Impact of Outsourcing and High-technology Capital on Wages: Estimates for the United States, 1979–1990,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, pp. 907–940.

Gramlich Edward . Benefit-Cost Analysis, New York: Prentice-Hall, 1985.

Hamel Gary Prahalad

C.K.

(1994). Competing for the Future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Hira Ronil (2003). “Global Outsourcing of Engineering Jobs: Recent Trends and Possible Implications,” Testimony given to the United States House of Representatives Committee on Small Business, June 18.

10.

Kotabe Masaaki Murray Janet

(2004). “Global Sourcing Strategy and Sustainable Competitive Advantage,” Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 33: 7–14.

11.

Kotler Philip (2003). Marketing Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

12.

Lawrence

R.Z.

(1996). Single World, Divided Nations? International Trade and OECD Labor Markets, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, and OECD Development Centre, Paris.

13.

Leontief

W W

, (1953). “Domestic Production and Foreign Trade: The American Capital Position Re-examined,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, vol. XCVII (September, 1953), 332–49.

14.

McCarthy Ian Anagnostou Angela (2004). “The Impact of Outsourcing on the Transaction Costs and Boundaries of Manufacturing,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 88: 61–71.

15.

Porter Eduardo (2004). “Outsourcing is Becoming a Harder Sell in the U.S.” New York Times, March 6: C2.

16.

Quinn Brian

James

Hilmer Frederick

(1995). “Strategic Outsourcing,” McKinsey Quarterly, No. 1:48–70.

17.

→ Slaughter Matthew

(2000). “Production transfer within multinational enterprises and American wages,” Journal of International Economics 50, pp. 449–472.

18.

Siegel Donald Zvi Griliches (1991). “Purchased Services, Outsourcing, Computers, and Productivity in Manufacturing,” NBER Working Paper No. 3678, Cambridge, Mass.

19.

Stolper Wolfgang Samuelson Paul . 1941. “Protection and Real Wages.” Review of Economic Studies. (November): 58–73.

20.

E-Commerce and Development Report 2003, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. United Nations Publication: New York and Geneva.

21.

Zajac Edward

(1995). Political Economy of Fairness. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

High-Tech Outsourcing: A Benefit-Cost Framework

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References