The Sensitivity Analysis of the FHA Technique of Housing Market Analysis: The Effect of Ratios and Variables,and Their Perturbations on Family and Elderly Demand Estimates
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2004
The Sensitivity Analysis of the FHA Technique of Housing Market Analysis: The Effect of Ratios and Variables,and Their Perturbations on Family and Elderly Demand Estimates
This paper applies the sensitivity analysis to the Federal Housing Administration's (FHA) techniques for reviewing family and elderly housing market conditions through the perturbations of its fundamental parameters. Models are presented for estimating the demand on the family and the elderly housing, and empirical illustrations for the practitioners of a housing market analysis are indicated. We elevate the FHA technique from a descriptive level within an engineering paradigm that did not change for over half a century to an evolutionary statistical model. Housing market analysts will find the model a useful supplement to their regular operations in terms of the diagnostic checks for their estimates.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Association of Retired Persons. Across the States 1998: Profiles of Long-Term Care Systems, 3rd ed., (Washington, D.C.: AARP, 1998a).
2.
American Association of Retired Persons. Boomers Approaching Midlife: How Secure a Future?, (Washington, D.C.: AARP, 1998b).
3.
AnasAlexRichardJ. Amott., “Dynamic Housing Market Equilibrium with Taste Heterogeneity, Idiosyncratic Perfect Foresight, and Stock Conversions,”Journal of Housing Economics, 1(1), 1991, 2–32.
4.
AndersonR.SonnenscheinH., “On the Existence of Rational Expectation Equilibrium,”Journal of Economic Theory, 26, 1982, 261–278.
5.
ArrowKennethHahnF. H., General Competitive Analysis, (San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day, Inc., 1971).
6.
ASPE: The Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation and AOA: The Administration on Aging. Informal Caregiving: Compassion in Action, (Washington, D.C.: 1998).
7.
→ CarnapRudolf, “The Two Concepts of Probability,”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 5, 1945, 513–532.
CohenPaulR., Heuristic Reasoning about Uncertainty: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, (Boston, MA: Pitman Advanced Publishing Program, 1985).
10.
→ DempsterA. P., “Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping,”Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 38, 1967, 325–339.
11.
→ DebreuG.ScarfH., “A Limit Theorem on the Core of an Economy,”International Economic Review, 4, 1963, 235–246.
12.
DornbuschRudigerFisherStanleyStartzRichard, Macroeconomics, (New York: Irwin-McGraw-Hill, 1998.
13.
EngelhardtGaryV.JamesM. Poterba, “Housing Prices and Demographic Change: Canadian Evidence,”Regional Science and Urban Economics, 21, 1991, 539–546.
14.
JonathanFeinsteinDaniel McFadden, “The Dynamics of Housing Demand by the Elderly: Wealth, Cash Flow, and Demographics Effects,” NBER Working Paper # 2471, December 1987; Reprinted inThe Economics of Aging, WiseD., ed., (University of Chicago Press, 1989, 55–86).
15.
FHA, “Techniques of Housing Market Analysis,” Department of Housing and Urban Development, Techniques Developed by FHA Economic and Market Analysis Division, Revised, August, 1970.
16.
→ FairRayC.DwightM Jaffee, “Method of Estimation for Markets in Disequilibrium,”Econometrica, 40, No. 3, 1972, 497–514.
17.
FriedmanMilton, A Theory of the Consumption Function, (Princeton University Press1957).
18.
FuchsVictorR., “Medicare Reform: The Larger Picture,”Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(2), Spring 2000, 57–70.
19.
GordonJeanEdwardH. Shortliffe, “The Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence,” in BruceG. Buchanan edward H. Shortliffe, Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project, (New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1985).
20.
GrangerCliveW. J., Empirical Modeling in Economics: Specification and Evaluation, (Cambridge University Press, 1999, and 2002).
21.
HalpernJosephY.FaginRonald, “Two Views of Belief: Belief as Generalized Probability and Belief as Evidence,”Artificial Intelligence, 54, 1992, 275–317.
22.
HamiltonBruceW., “The Baby Boom, the Baby Bust, and the Housing Market: A Second Look,”Regional Science and Urban Economics, 21, 1990, 547–552.
23.
HawesC.RoseM.PhillipsC.D.IannacchioneV., A National Study of Assisted Living for the Frail Elderly: Results of a National Telephone Survey of Facilities, (Beachwood, OH: Menorah Park Center for the Aging, 1999).
24.
HawesC.WildfireJ.B.LuxL.J., Regulation of Board and Care Homes: Results of a Survey in the 50 States and the District of Columbia: National Summary, (Washington, D.C.: American Association of Retired Persons, 1993).
25.
HawesCatherineRoseMariamCharlesD. Phillips, A National Study of Assisted Living for the Frail Elderly, Myers Research Institute Study, December 14, 1999.
26.
HerbertLiesiE.PaulA. ScherrLaurelA. BeckettAlbertMarilyn S.PilgrimDavid M.ChownMarilyn J.FunkensteinH. HarrisDenisA. Evans, “Age-Specific Incidence of Alzheimer's Disease in a Community Population,”JAMA, May 3, 1995, 1354–1360.
HoegerThomasJ.GabrielA. PiconeFrankA. Sloan., “Public Subsidies, Private Provision of Care and Living Arrangements of the Elderly,”The Review of Economics and Statistics, LXXVII, 3, 1996, 428–440.
29.
KleinL. R.KosobudR. F., “Some Econometrics of Growth: Great Ratios of Economics,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, LXXV, 2, 1961, 173–198.
30.
KrepsD., “A Note on ‘Fulfilled Expectations’ Equilibrium,”Journal of Economic Theory, 14, 1977, 14, 32–43.
LeeTong Hun, “The Stock Demand Elasticities of Non-Farm Housing,”The Review of Economics and Statistics, XLVI, 1964, 82–89.
33.
LeeuwFrank de, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 52(1), 1971, 1–10.
34.
LewisDavid, “The Subjectivist's Guide to Objective Chance,” in RichardC. Jeffrey, ed., Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, volume II, (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1980).
35.
National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS)“Health Data on Older Americans,” Series, 3, No. 27, January 1993.
36.
→ MankiwGregoryN.DavidN. Weil, “The Baby Boom, The Baby Bust, and the Housing Market,”Regional Science and Urban Economics, 19, 1989, 235–258.
37.
McAllisterPatrickH.“Rational Behavior and Rational Expectation,”Journal of Economic Theory, 52, No. 2, 1990, 332–363.
38.
MegbolugbeIsaacSa-AaduJ.JamesD. Shilling, “Elderly Female-Headed Households and the Decision to Trade Down,”Journal of Housing Economics, 8(4), 1999, 285–300.
39.
MontgomeryClaireA., “A Structural Model of the U.S. Housing Market: Improvement and New Construction,”Journal of Housing Economics, 5(2), 1996, 166–192.
40.
MuthRichardF., “The Demand for Non-farm Housing,” in ArnoldC. Harberger, ed., The Demand for Durable Goods (University of Chicago Press, 1960).
41.
National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), “Health Data on Older Americans,” Series, 3, No. 27, January 1993.
42.
OrponenP., “Dempster's Rule of Combination is #P-complete,”Artificial Intelligence, 44, 1990, 245–253.
43.
PitkinJohnR.MyersDowell. “The Specification of Demographic Effects on Housing Demand: Avoiding the Age-Cohort Fallacy,”Journal of Housing Economics, 3(3), 1994, 240–250.
44.
PriceWaterhouseCoopers, “The Assisted Living Industry: An Overview-1998,” Survey in 1997.
45.
RicksBruceR., “Comment on Fair, Ray C., Disequilibrium in Housing Models,”Journal of Finance, XXVII, 1972, 220.
46.
SavageL. J., The Foundations of Statistics, (New York: John Wiley and Son, 1954).
47.
→ SchiffEric, “Family Size and Residential Construction,”The American Economic Review, 36(1), 1946, 97–112.
48.
ShaferGlenn, “The Combination of Evidence,”International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1, 1986, 155–179.
49.
ShaferGlenn, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, (Princeton University Press, 1976).
50.
→ SicklesRobinC.TaubmanPaul, “An Analysis of the Health and Retirement Status of the Elderly,”Econometrica, 54(6), November 1986, 1339–1356.
51.
SmetsPhillippe, “Belief Function in Decision Making,” in SrivastacaR., ed., Survey of Decision Making Within the Upper-Lower Probability and the TBM Frameworks. (Physica-Verlag, 2001, forthcoming).
SmetsPhillippe, “Imperfect Information: Imprecision and Uncertainty,” in MotroAmihaiSmetsPhillippe, ed., Uncertainty Management in Information Systems: From Needs to Solution, (Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997).
54.
SmetsPhillippeKruseRudolf, “The Transferable Belief Model for Belief Representation,” in MotroAmihaiSmetsPhillippe, ed., Uncertainty Management in Information Systems: From Needs to Solution, (Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997).
55.
SmetsPhillippe“Numerical Representation of Uncertainty,” inHandbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management System, vol. 3, (Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998).
56.
SmithLawrenceB., “Disequilibrium in Housing Models,”Journal of Finance, Discussion, XXVII, 1972, 228.
57.
SmithLawrenceB., “A Note on the Price Adjustment Mechanism for Rental Housing,”American Economic Review, 64, June, 1974, 478–481.
58.
StoneR.I., Long-term Care for the Elderly with Disabilities: Current Policy, Emerging Trends, and Implications for the Twenty-First Century, by RobynI. StoneFunded by Milbank Memorial Funds, August 2000.
59.
→ SuppesP.WinetM., “An Axiomatization of Utility Based on the Notion of Utility of Differences,”Management Science, 1, 1955, 259–270.
60.
SwanCraig, “The Markets for Housing and Housing Services: Comment,”Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 5(4), 1973, 960–972.
61.
SwanCraig, “Labor and Material Requirements for Housing,”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1971(2), 347–377.
62.
von NeumannJ.MorgensternO., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, (Princeton University Press, 1944, Third Edition, 1953).
63.
VoorbraakFrans, “On the justification of Dempster's rule of combination,”Artificial Intelligence, 48, 1991, 171–197.
64.
→ WalleyPeter, “Belief Function Representations of Statistical Evidence,”The Annals of Statistics, 15(4), 1987, 1439–1465.
65.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, “Loosing a Million Minds: Confronting the Tragedy of Alzheimer’ Disease and Other Dementias,” OTA-BA-323 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, April, 1987).
