Examining the impact of test type in Principles of Macroeconomics via two-stage estimation of an education production function, I find that students do better on a post–course TUCE when they take multiple choice exams throughout the semester instead of taking essay exams. The type of test, however, does not impact the student's attitude toward economics or the decision to complete the course.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmemiyaTakeshi. Advanced Econometrics, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1985.
2.
AndersonGordonBenjaminDwayneMelvynA. Fuss. “The Determinants of Success in University Introductory Economics Courses.”Journal of Economic Education, Spring 1994, 99–119.
3.
BeckerWilliamE.“Teaching Economics to Undergraduates.”Journal of Economic Literature, September 1997, 1347–73.
4.
BeckerWilliamE.JohnR. PowersSaundersPhilip. “Problems of Missing Student Data and the Importance of Class Size in Student Achievement.” Working paper, Indiana University, 1997.
5.
BeckerWilliamE.WilliamB. Walstad. “Data Loss From Pretest to Posttest as a Sample Selection Problem.”Review of Economics and Statistics, February 1990, 184–8.
6.
DouglasStratfordSulockJoseph. “Estimating Educational Production Functions with Correction for Drops.”Journal of Economic Education, Spring 1995, 101–12.
7.
GreeneBenjamin. “Verbal Abilities, Gender, and the Introductory Economics Course: A New Look at an Old Assumption.”Journal of Economic Education, Winter 1997, 13–30.
8.
GrimesPaulW.PaulS. Nelson. “The Social Issues Pedagogy vs. The Traditional Principles of Economics: An Empirical Examination.”The American Economist, Spring 1998, 56–64.
9.
HeckmanJamesM.“Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.”Econometrica, January 1979, 153–61.
10.
LumsdenKeithG.ScottAlex. “The Economics Student Reexamined: Male-Female Difference in Comprehension.”Journal of Economic Education, Fall 1987, 365–75.
11.
MaxwellNanL.JaneS. Lopus. “A Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Large and Small Classes in the University.”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Summer 1995, 167–78.
12.
PaulHarvey. “The Impact of Outside Employment on Student Achievement in Macroeconomic Principles.”Journal of Economic Education, Summer 1982, 51–6.
13.
PleeterSaulPhilipK. Way. Economics in the News, Second Edition, Reading, Massachusetts: Addison–Wesley, 1993.
14.
RayMargaretA.PaulW. Grimes. “Performance and Attitudinal Effects of a Computer Laboratory in the Principles of Economics Course.”Social Science Computer Review, Spring 1992, 42–58.
15.
SiegfriedJohnJ.FelsRendig. “Research on Teaching College Economics: A Survey.”Journal of Economic Literature, September 1979, 923–69.
16.
SiegfriedJohnJ.WilliamB. Walstad. “Research on Teaching College Economics,” in The Principle of Economics Course: A ‘Handbook for Instructors, edited by WalstadW.B.SaundersP., McGraw Hill: New York, 1990, 270–86.
17.
SiegfriedJohnJ.WilliamB. Walstad. “Research on Teaching College Economics,” in Teaching Undergraduate Economics: A Handbook for Instructors, edited by WalstadW.B.SaundersP., Irwin/McGraw Hill: Boston, 1998, 141–66.
18.
SaundersPhilip. Test of Understanding in College Economics, Third Editions, Examiner's Manual, New York: Joint Council on Economic Education, 1991.
19.
SoperJohnC.WilliamB. Walstad. “On Measuring Economic Attitudes.”Journal of Economic Education, Fall 1983, 4–17.
20.
WalstadWilliamB.WilliamE. Becker. “Achievement Differences on Multiple Choice and Essay Tests in Economics.”American Economic Review, May 1994, 193–6.
