Accompanying the increase in technical controversies in the last 20 years has been an explosion of whistleblowing by those involved in the design, implementation, and operation of complex technologies. Whistleblowers provide a window onto the trade-off, in the construction of social problems, between one's credibility and the pursuit of one's interests. Whistleblowers gain credibility for speaking out contrary to their own interests and those of their employers, but they lack the organizational power to promote their definitions of the social problem. Typically the result of a conflict between professional ethics and organizational demands, whistleblowing can heighten controversy and provide ammunition for critics of a technology. A few prominent whistleblowers, blacklisted in their industry, even turn to social movement organizations for employment, though by normal predictors of activism they should be the last to join the movement. Examples drawn from the nuclear power industry are used to demonstrate the importance of whistleblowers in technical controversies.
Best, J. (1987) “Rhetoric in Claims-Making: Constructing the Missing Children Problem”, Social Problems34(2): 101-121.
3.
Carpenter, T. (1990) Personal interview, 18 May.
4.
Clarke, L. (1985) “The Social Origins of Nuclear Power: A Case of Institutional Conflict”, Social Problems32(5): 474-487.
5.
Clarke, L. (1988) “Explaining Choices Among Technological Risks”, Social Problems35(1): 22-35.
6.
Conway, J.H. (1977) “Protecting the Private Sector at Will Employee who `Blows the Whistle': A Cause of Action Based upon Determinants of Public Policy”, Wisconsin Law Review77: 777-812.
7.
Dowie, M. (1980) “Pinto Madness”, in R.J. Baum (ed.) Ethical Problems in Engineering, pp. 167-174. Troy, NY: Rensselaer Polytechnic.
8.
Downs, A. (1972) “Up and Down with Ecology: The Issue Attention Cycle”, The Public Interest28: 38-50.
9.
Elliston, F. , Keenan, J., Lockhart, P. and van Schaick, J. (1985) Whistleblowing Research. New York: Praeger.
10.
Ford, D. (1982) The Cult of the Atom. New York: Simon and Schuster.
11.
Gamson, W.A. and Modigliani, A. (1989) “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power”, American Journal of Sociology95(1): 1-37.
12.
Gerhards, J. (1995) “Framing Dimensions and Framing Strategies: Contrasting Ideal-and Real-Type Frames”, Social Science Information34(2): 225-248.
13.
Glazer, M. and Glazer, P. (1989) The Whistleblowers. New York: Basic Books.
14.
Greenberger, D.B. , Miceli, M.P. and Cohen, D.J. (1987) “Oppositionists and Group Norms: The Reciprocal Influence of Whistle-blowers and Co-workers”, Journal of Business Ethics6(1): 527-542.
15.
Gusfield, J.R. (1981) The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Gusfield, J.R. (1989) “Constructing the Ownership of Social Problems: Fun and Profit in the Welfare State”, Social Problems36(5): 431-441.
17.
Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon.
18.
Hacker, A. (1978) “Loyalty-and the Whistle Blower”, Across the Board15: 4-9, 67.
19.
Hall, R.H. (1972) “Professionalization and Bureaucracy”, in R.H. Hall (ed.) The Formal Organization, pp. 143-163. New York: Basic Books.
20.
Jasper, J.M. (1987) “Avoiding Technological Disasters: Skepticism and Belief in Technical Organizations”, paper presented to the American Sociological Association annual meetings, Chicago, August.
21.
Jasper, J.M. (1988) “The Political Life Cycle of Technological Controversies”, Social Forces67(2): 357-377.
22.
Jasper, J.M. (1990) Nuclear Politics: Energy and the State in the United States, Sweden and France. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
Jasper, J.M. and Nelkin, D. (1992) The Animal Rights Crusade: The Growth of a Moral Protest. New York: Free Press.
24.
Jasper, J.M. and Poulsen, J. (1993) “Fighting Back: Vulnerabilities, Blunders, and Countermobilization by the Targets in Three Animal Rights Campaigns”, Sociological Forum8(4): 639-657.
25.
Jensen, J.V. (1987) “Ethical Tension Points in Whistleblowing”, Journal of Business Ethics6: 321-328.
26.
Keck, O. (1987) “The Information Dilemma: Private Information as a Cause of Transaction Failure in Markets, Regulation, Hierarchy, and Politics”, Journal of Conflict Resolution31(1): 139-163.
27.
MacIntyre, A. (1981) After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
28.
Mannheim, K. (1936) Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
29.
Mazur, A. (1981) The Dynamics of Technical Controversy. Washington, DC: Communications Press.
30.
Mazur, A. (1984) “Media Influences on Public Attitudes Toward Nuclear Power”, in W.R. Freudenburg and E.A. Rosa (eds) Public Reactions to Nuclear Power, pp. 97-114. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
31.
Meiksins, P.F. and Watson, J.M. (1989) “Professional Autonomy and Organization Constraint: The Case of Engineers”, Sociological Quarterly30(4): 561-585.
32.
MHB Associates (1990) Advanced Reactor Study. Washington, DC: Union of Concerned Scientists.
33.
Mitnick, B.M. (1980) The Political Economy of Regulation. New York: Columbia University Press.
34.
Morgan, P. (1980) “The State as Mediator: Alcohol Problem Management in the Postwar Period”, Contemporary Drug Problems9: 107-136.
35.
Nelkin, D. (1971) Nuclear Power and its Critics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
36.
Parmerlee, M.A. , Near, J.P. and Jensen, T.C. (1982) “Correlates of Whistle-Blowers' Perceptions of Organizational Retaliation”, Administrative Science Quarterly27: 17-34.
37.
Parsons, T. (1939) “The Professions and Social Structure”, Social Forces17: 457-467.
38.
Perrucci, R. , Anderson, R.M., Schendel, D.E. and Trachtman, L.E. (1980) “Whistle-Blowing: Professionals' Resistance to Organizational Authority”, Social Problems28(2): 149-164.
39.
Randall, D.M. and Short, J.F., Jr (1983) “Women in Toxic Work Environments: A Case Study of Social Problem Development”, Social Problems30(4): 410-424.
40.
Schoenfeld, A.C. , Meier, R.F. and Griffin, R.J. (1979) “Constructing a Social Problem: The Press and the Environment”, Social Problems27(1): 38-61.
41.
Scott, W.R. (1966) “Professionals in Organizations: Areas of Conflict”, in R. Gross and P. Osterman (eds) Professionalization, pp. 265-275. New York: Simon and Schuster.
42.
Shonfield, A. (1965) Modern Capitalism. London: Oxford University Press.
43.
Snow, D. and Benford, R.D. (1988) “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization”, in B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi and S. Tarrow (eds) From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research Across Cultures, pp. 197-219. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
44.
Snow, D.A. , Rochford, E.B., Jr., Worden, S.K. and Benford, R.D. (1986) “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation”, American Sociological Review51(4): 464-481.
Soeken, K.L. and Soeken, D.R. (1987) “A Survey of Whistleblowers: Their Stressors and Coping Strategies”, unpublished paper. Laurel, MD.
47.
Spector, M. and Kitsuse, J.I. (1987) Constructing Social Problems. New York: Aldine/de Gruyter.
48.
US Congress (1976) “Investigation of Charges Relating to Nuclear Reactor Safety”, Hearings before the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, 18, 23, 24 February. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
49.
Vaughan, D. (1990) “Autonomy, Interdependence, and Social Control: NASA and the Space Shuttle Challenger”, Administrative Science Quarterly35(2): 225-257.
50.
Vogel, D. (1986) National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
51.
Walker, J.S. (1992) Containing the Atom: Nuclear Regulation in a Changing Environment 1963-1971. Berkeley: University of California Press.
