This paper examines the main features of the emerging global information society and tries to understand the place of the individual within it. The issue of identity is addressed in its deep, ambivalent dimensions and the question of whether present-day society can still be analysed within the conceptual legacy of modernity is discussed. While new forms of power and domination emerge, the nature of conflicts is changing as well. In this framework social knowledge plays a central role and social scientists are asked to take on new responsibilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, J.C. (1989) Structure and Meaning: Relinking Classical Sociology. New York: Columbia University Press.
2.
Bateson, G. (1991) A Sacred Unity: New Steps to an Ecology of Mind. San Francisco, CA: Harper.
3.
Bauman, Z. (1991) Modernity and Ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4.
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
5.
Bruner, J. (1986) Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993) The Evolving Self. New York: Harper.
7.
Douglas, M. (1992) Risk and Blame. London: Routledge.
8.
Elias, N. (1991) The Society of Individuals. Oxford: Blackwell.
9.
Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10.
Habermas, J. (1990) The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
11.
Melucci, A. (1996) The Playing Self: Person and Meaning in the Planetary Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Melucci, A. (1996) Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Taylor, C. (1989) Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
Touraine, A. (1994) Critique of Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
