Luhmann (1984) has proposed a second-order theory of social communications, but its formalization in terms of second-order systems theory has remained underdeveloped. Second-order systems theory is a formal option and, furthermore, Shannon's (1948) mathematical theory of communication is available. The operationalization of Luhmann-type (reflexive) communications in terms of Shannon-type (first-order) communications has theoretical consequences: one is able to distinguish, more clearly than Luhmann did, between not (yet) meaningful information (“uncertainty”) and its potential meaning after selection by an observing system. Structural coupling between co-evolving systems can be distinguished from operational coupling between subsystems. This operationalization provides us with means to clarify, among other things, the theoretical debate between Münch and Luhmann about Parsons' concept of “interpenetration”. Technological developments can be analysed in terms of operational and recursive coupling at the interfaces between sciences and markets. In a triple helix model of university-industry-government relations codes of functionally differentiated communication can be translated into each other. Interorganizational configurations support the emerging communication systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ahrweiler, P. (1995) Künstliche Intelligenz-Forschung in Deutschland. Die Etablierung eines Hochtechnologie-Fachs [Artificial Intelligence Research in Germany: The Establishment of a High-tech Field]. Münster/New York: Waxmann.
2.
Arthur, W.B. (1988) “Competing Technologies”, in G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete (eds) Technical Change and Economic Theory, pp. 590-607. London: Pinter.
3.
Attneave, F. (1959) Applications of Information Theory to Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
4.
Bailey, K. D. (1994) Sociology and the New Systems Theory. New York: State University of New York Press.
5.
Bateson, G. (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine.
6.
Blauwhof, G. (1995) The Non-linear Dynamics of Technological Developments: An Exploration of Telecommunications Technology, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.
7.
Braverman, H. (1974) Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York/London: Monthly Review Press.
8.
Dosi, G. (1982) “Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories”, Research Policy11: 147-162.
9.
Elzinga, A. (1992) “The Theory of Epistemic Drift. A Way of Relating the Social and the Epistemic”, Revue Roumaine de Philosophie36: 45-61.
10.
Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (1995) “The Triple Helix - University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development”, EASST Review14(1): 14-19.
11.
Foucault, M. (1972[1969]) The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
12.
Gibbons, M. , Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
13.
Giddens, A. (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory. London: Macmillan.
14.
Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15.
Gouldner, A.W. (1976) The Dialectic of Ideology and Technology. London: Macmillan.
16.
Grathoff, R. , ed. (1978) The Theory of Social Action. The Correspondence of Alfred Schutz and Talcott Parsons. Bloomington/London: Indiana University Press.
17.
Habermas, J. (1968) “Technik und Wissenschaft als `Ideologie' ”, in J. Habermas, Technik und Wissenschaft als “Ideologie”, pp. 48-103. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
18.
Haraway, D. (1988) “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective,”Feminist Studies14: 575-599.
19.
Kampmann, C. , Haxholdt, C., Mosekilde, E. and Sterman, J.D. (1994) “Entrainment in a Disaggregated Long-Wave Model”, in L. Leydesdorff and P. Van den Besselaar (eds) Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies, pp. 109-124. London: Pinter.
20.
Knorr, K.D. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextualist Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
21.
Leydesdorff, L. (1993a) “Structure'/`Action' Contingencies and the Model of Parallel Distributed Processing”, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour23: 47-77.
22.
Leydesdorff, L. (1993b) “Is Society a Self-Organizing System?”, Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems16: 331-349.
23.
Leydesdorff, L. (1994a) “New Models of Technological Change: New Theories for Technology Studies”, in L. Leydesdorff and P. Van den Besselaar (eds) Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies, pp. 180-192. London: Pinter.
24.
Leydesdorff, L. (1994b) “The Evolution of Communication Systems”, International Journal of Systems Research and Information Science6: 219-230.
25.
Leydesdorff, L. (1995a) The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development, Measurement, and Self-organization of Scientific Communications. Leiden: DSWO Press, Leiden University.
26.
Leydesdorff, L. (1995b) “The Possibility of a Mathematical Sociology of Scientific Communications”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science (forthcoming).
27.
Leydesdorff, L. (1995c) “The Operation of the Social System in a Model based on Cellular Automata”, Social Science Information34(3): 413-441.
28.
Leydesdorff, L. (1996) “The Non-linear Dynamics of Sociological Reflections”, International Sociology11 (forthcoming).
29.
Leydesdorff, L. , and Van den Besselaar, P. (eds) (1994) Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies. London: Pinter.
30.
Leydesdorff, L. and Gauthier, E. (forthcoming) “The Evaluation of National Performance in Selected Priority Areas using Scientometric Methods”, Research Policy.
31.
Luhmann, N. (1977) “Interpenetration - Zum Verhältnis personaler und sozialer Systeme”, Zeitschrift für Soziologie6: 62-76.
32.
Luhmann, N. (1982) Liebe als Passion. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
33.
Luhmann, N. (1984) Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
34.
Luhmann, N. (1990) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
35.
Luhmann, N. (1993) Das Recht der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
36.
Marx, K. (1857/[1939]) Grundrisse der Kritik der politischen Oekonomie. Moscow: Marx-Engels-Lenin Institute.
37.
Maturana, H.R. (1978) “Biology of Language: The Epistemology of Reality”, in G.A. Miller and E. Lenneberg (eds), Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought. Essays in Honor of Eric Lenneberg, pp. 27-63. New York: Academic Press.
38.
Merton, R.K. (1938) Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth-Century England. Bruges: Saint Catherine Press.
39.
Merton, R.K. (1942) “Science and Technology in a Democratic Order”, Journal of Legal and Political Sociology1: 115-126.
40.
Münch, R. (1982) Theorie des Handelns. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. English translation, Understanding Modernity. London/New York: Routledge, 1988.
41.
Nelson, R.R. (1994) “Economic Growth via the Coevolution of Technology and Institutions”, in L. Leydesdorff and P. Van den Besselaar (eds) Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies, pp. 21-32. London: Pinter.
42.
Noble, D. (1977) America by Design. New York: Knopf.
43.
Parsons, T. (1937) The Structure of Social Action. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
44.
Parsons, T. (1968) “Interaction: I. Social Interaction”, in: The International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 7, pp. 429-441. New York: McGraw-Hill.
45.
Parsons, T. and Shils, E.A., eds (1951) Toward a General Theory of Action. New York: Harper & Row.
46.
Shannon, C.E. (1948) “A Mathematical Theory of Communication”, Bell System Technical Journal27: 379-423, 623-656.
47.
Simon, H.A. (1969) The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.
48.
Swenson, R. (1989) “Emergent Attractors and the Law of Maximum Entropy Production: Foundations to a Theory of General Evolution”, Systems Research6: 187-197.
49.
Theil, H. (1972) Statistical Decomposition Analysis. Amsterdam/London: North-Holland.
50.
Van den Besselaar, P. and Leydesdorff, L. (1993) “Research Performance in Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. An International Comparison”, AI Communications6: 83-91.
