Barnes, B. ; Bloor, D. 1982 “Relativism, rationalism and the sociology of knowledge”, pp. 21-47 in: M. Hollis and S. Lukes (eds.), Rationality and Relativism. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
2.
Bernal, J. D. 1939 The Social Function of Science. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
3.
Bloor, D. 1976Knowledge and Social Imagery. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
4.
Collins, H. M.1975“The seven sexes: a study in the sociology of a phenomenon, or the replication of experiments in physics” , Sociology9 (2): 205-224.
5.
Collins, H. M.1981“Son of seven sexes: the social destruction of a physical phenomenon” , Social Studies of Science11 (1): 33-62.
6.
Darmon, G. ; Matalon, B.1985“Recherche sur les pratiques de vérification des expériences scientifiques: deux études de cas”, Année Sociologique36 (1): 209-238.
7.
Duhem, P. 1981 La théorie physique. Son objet, sa structure. Paris, Vrin (facsimile of the 1915 rev. and augm. edn).
8.
Encrenaz, P. 1982 “Entretien sur le problème de la vérification des expériences en physique”, Paris (interview).
9.
Garfinkel, H. ; Lynch, M.; Livingston, E.1981“The work of a discovering science constructed with materials from the optically discovered pulsat”, Philosophy of Social Sciences11 (2): 131-158.
10.
Hollis, M. ; Lukes, S. 1982 Rationality and Relativism. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
11.
Jagtenberg, T. 1983 The Social Construction of Science. Dordrecht, Reidel.
12.
Knorr, K. D.1977“Producing and reproducing knowledge: descriptive or constructive? Toward a model of research production” , Social Science Information16 (6): 669-696.
13.
Knorr-Cetina, K. D. 1981 The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford, Pergamon.
14.
Knorr-Cetina, K. D. 1983 “The ethnographic study of scientific work: toward a constructivist interpretation of science”, pp. 115-140, in: K. D. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay (eds.), Science Observed. London, Sage.
15.
Knorr-Cetina, K. D. ; Mulkay, M. (eds.) 1983 Science Observed: Perspectives on Social Study of Science. London, Sage.
16.
Kuhn, T. S. 1970 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press (2nd edn).
17.
Latour, B. ; Woolgar, S. 1979 Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London, Sage.
18.
Lequeux, J. 1981 La nouvelle révolution astronomique. Paris, Hachette.
19.
Lynch, M. ; Livingston, E.; Garfinkel, H. 1983 “Temporal order in laboratory work”, pp. 205-238, in: K. D. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay (eds.), Science Observed. London, Sage.
20.
Mackenzie, D.1978“Statistical theory and social interests” , Social Studies of Science8 (1): 35-83.
21.
Merton, R. K. 1973 “The normative structure of science”, pp. 223-278, in: The Sociology of Science. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press (1st edn 1948).
22.
Newton-Smith, W. H. 1981 The Rationality of Science. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
23.
Pantin, C. F. A. 1968 The Relations between the Sciences. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
24.
Pinch, T.1981“The sun set: the presentation of certainty in scientific life” , Social Studies of Science11 (1): 131-158.
25.
Shapin, S. 1979 “The politics of observation: cerebral anatomy and social interests in the Edinburgh phrenology disputes”, in: R. Wallis (ed.), On the Margins of Science. Keele, Sociological Review Monograph, 27.
26.
Shapin, S.1982“History of science and its sociological reconstructions” , History of Science, 20: 157-211.
27.
Travis, G. D. L.1981“Replicating replication? Aspects of the social construction of learning in planarian worms” , Social Studies of Science11 (1): 11-32.
28.
Woolgar, S.1982“Laboratory studies: a comment on the state of the art” , Social Studies of Science12 (4): 481-498.
