Allison, P. 1979 “Experimental Parapsychology as a rejected science”, in: R. Wallis, (ed.), On the margins of science: the social construction of rejected knowledge. Keele, University of Keele (Sociological Review Monographs).
2.
Bok, B. and 185 others. 1975“Objections to astrology”, The Humanist35 (5): 4-6.
3.
Barnes, B. 1982 T.S. Kuhn and social science. London, Macmillan.
Collins, H.M.1975“The seven sexes: a study in the sociology of a phenomenon, or the replication of experiment in physics” , Sociology9: 205-224.
6.
Collins, H.M. 1982 “Introduction” to: H.M. Collins (ed.), Sociology of scientific knowledge: a source book. Bath, Bath University Press.
7.
Collins, H.M. ; Pinch, T.J. 1979 “The construction of the paranormal: nothing unscientific is happening”, in: R. Wallis (ed.), On the margins of science. University of Keele, Keele (Sociological Review Monographs).
8.
Pinch, T.J. ; Pinch, T.J. 1982 Frames of meaning: the social construction of extraordinary science. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
9.
Cooter, R. 1980 “Deploying `pseudoscience': then and now”, in: M. Hanen; M. Osler and R. Weyant (eds), Science, pseudo-science and society. Waterloo, Ontario, Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
10.
Dolby, R.G.A. 1979 “Reflections on deviant science”, in: R. Wallis (ed.), On the margins of science. Keele, University of Keele (Sociological Review Monographs).
11.
Eysenck, J. ; Nias, D.K. 1984 Astrology: science or superstition?Harmondsworth, Penguin.
12.
Feyerabend, P. 1978 Science in a free society. New York, Schocken.
13.
Gardner, M. 1957 Fads and fallacies in the name of science. New York, Dover Publications.
14.
Gieryn, T.F. 1983a “Making the demarcation of science a sociological problem: boundary work by John Tyndall, Victorian scientist”, in: R. Laudan (ed.), The demarcation between science and pseudo-science. Blacksburg, Va., Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Center for the Study of Science and Society.
15.
Gieryn, T.F.1983b“Boundary work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists” , American Sociological Review48: 781-795.
16.
Hanen, M.P. ; Osler, M.J.; Weyant, R. (eds) 1980 Science, pseudo-science and society. Waterloo, Ontario, Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
17.
Hardin, C.L.1981“Table-turning, parapsychology and fraud” , Social Studies of Science11: 249-255.
18.
Lakatos, I. 1970 “Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes”, in: I. Lakatos; A. Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. London, Cambridge University Press.
19.
Lakatos, I. 1978 “Introduction: science and pseudoscience”, in: The methodology of scientific research programmes. London, Cambridge University Press.
20.
Laudan, L. 1983 “The demise of the demarcation problem”, in: R. Laudan (ed.), The demarcation between science and pseudo-science. Blacksburg, Va., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Center for the Study of Science and Society.
21.
Leahey, T.H. ; Leahey, G.E. 1983 Psychology's occult doubles: psychology and the problem of pseudoscience. Chicago, Ill., Nelson-Hall.
22.
Mulkay, M. 1979 Science and the sociology of knowledge. London, Allen and Unwin.
23.
Newton-Smith, W.H. 1981 The rationality of science. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
24.
Pinch, T.J.1979“Normal explanations of the paranormal: the demarcation problem and fraud in parapsychology” , Social Studies of Science9: 329-348.
25.
Pinch, T.J.1981“Reply to Hardin” , Social Studies of Science11: 255-257.
26.
Shapin, S. 1979 “The politics of observation: cerebral anatomy and social interests in the Edinburgh Phrenology disputes”, in: R. Wallis (ed.), On the margins of science. University of Keele, Keele, (Sociological Review Monographs).
27.
Wallis, R.1973“Religious sects and the fear of publicity” , New Society7 (June). 545-547.
28.
Wallis, R. 1976 The road to total freedom: a sociological analysis of Scientology. London, Heinemann Educational Books.
29.
Wallis, R.1982 Review of M.P. Hanen; M.J. Osler and R.J. Weyant (eds) “Science, pseudo-science and society”, Social Studies of Science12: 477-480.
30.
Westrum, R.1976“Scientists as experts: observations on `Objections to Astrology' ” , The Zetetic1 (1): 34-46.
31.
Wynne, B. 1979 “Between orthodoxy and oblivion: the normalisation of deviance in science”, in: R. Wallis (ed.), On the margins of science. University of Keele, Keele (Sociological Review Monographs).
