Barnes, S. B. 1974 Scientific knowledge and sociological theory. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
2.
Barnes, S. B. 1977 Interests and the growth of knowledge. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
3.
Barnes, S. B.1981“On the `Hows' and `Whys' of cultural change”, Social Studies of Science11: 481-498.
4.
Barnes, S.B.; Dolby, R.G.A.1970“The scientific ethos: a deviant viewpoint”, European Journal of Sociology11:3-25.
5.
Bhaskar, R. 1975 A realist theory of science. Leeds, Leeds Books.
6.
Bhaskar, R. 1979 The possibility of naturalism. Sussex, Harvester Press.
7.
Bitz, A.; McAlpine, A.; Whitley, R. 1975 The production, flow and use of information in research laboratories in different sciences. Manchester, Manchester Business School. (Research report series, (ISSN 0306-5227))
8.
Bloor, D.1973“Wittgenstein and Mannheim on the sociology of mathematics”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science4:173-191.
9.
Bloor, D. 1976 Knowledge and social imagery. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
10.
Bourdieu, P.1975“The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason”, Social Science Information14: 19-47.
11.
Brannigan, A. 1981 The social basis of scientific discovery. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
12.
Bunge, M. 1959 Causality. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
13.
Callon, M. 1978 De problèmes en problèmes: Itinéraire d'un laboratoire universitaire saisi par l'aventure technologique. Paris, CORDES. (Mimeo.)
14.
Callon, M. 1980 “Struggles and negotiations to define what is problematic and what is not”, in: K. Knorret al. (eds). The social process of scientific investigation. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 4, Dordrecht, Boston, Mass. Reidel.
Collins, H.M.1975“The seven sexes: A study in the sociology of a phenomenon, or the replication of an experiment in physics”, Sociology9:205-224.
17.
Collins, H.M.1981(a)“Son of seven sexes: The social destruction of a physical phenomenon”, Social Studies of Science11:33-62.
18.
Collins, H.M.1981(b)“Stages in the empirical programmes of relativism”, Social Studies of Science11:3-10.
19.
Collins, R. 1975 Conflict sociology. New York, Academic Press.
20.
Crane, D. 1972 Invisible colleges. Chicago, Ill., Chicago University Press.
21.
Downey, K.J.1967“Sociology and the modern scientific revolution”, Sociological Quarterly8:239-254.
22.
Dupree, A.H. 1972 “The measuring behaviour of Americans”, in: G. Daniels (ed.). Nineteenth Century American Science, Evanston, North-Western University Press.
23.
Edge, D.O.; Mulkay, M.J. 1975 “Fallstudien zu wissenschaftlichen Spezialgebeten”, in: N. Stehr and R. König (eds). Wissenschaftssoziologie, Köln and Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag.
24.
Elias, N. 1974 “The sciences: Towards a theory”, in: R. Whitley (ed.). Social Processes of Scientific Development, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
25.
Elias, N. 1982 “Scientific Establishments”, in: N. Eliaset al. (eds). Scientific establishments and hierarchies. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 6, Dordrecht, Boston, Mass. Reidel.
26.
Geison, G.1981“Scientific change, emerging specialties and research schools”, History of Science19:20-40.
27.
Harré, R. 1970 The principles of scientific thinking. London, Macmillan.
28.
Harré, R. 1979 Social being. Oxford, Blackwell.
29.
Harré, R.; Madden, E. 1975 Causal powers, Oxford, Blackwell.
30.
Harré, R.; Secord, P.F. 1972 The explanation of social behaviour. Oxford, Blackwell.
31.
Harvey, B. 1980 “The effects of social context on the process of scientific investigation: Experimental tests of quantum mechanics”, in: K. Knorret al. (eds). The social process of scientific investigation. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 4, Dordrecht, Boston, Mass. Reidel.
32.
Hohlfeld, R. 1982 “Two scientific establishments which shape the pattern of cancer research in Germany: Basic science and medicine”, in: N. Eliaset al. (eds). Scientific establishments and hierarchies. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 6, Dordrecht, Boston, Mass., Reidel.
33.
Knorr-Cetina, K. 1981a The manufacture of knowledge. Oxford, Pergamon.
34.
Knorr-Cetina, K. 1981b “Introduction”, in: K. Knorr-Cetina and A. Cicourel (eds). Advances in social theory and methodology, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
35.
Knorr-Cetina, K.1982“Scientific communities or transepistemic arenas of research?”Social Studies of Sciences12: 101-130.
36.
Knorr-Cetina, K.; Cicourel, A.V. (eds) 1981 Advances in social theory and methodology. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
37.
Latour, B. 1980 “Is it possible to reconstruct the research process? Sociology of a brain Peptide”, in: K. Knorret al. (eds). The social process of scientific investigation. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 4, Dordrecht, Boston, Mass., Reidel.
38.
Latour, B.; Woolgar, S. 1979 Laboratory Life. London, Sage.
39.
Law, J.1973“The development of specialties in sciences: The case of X-ray crystallography”, Science Studies3:275-303.
40.
Lemaine, G.et al. (eds) 1976 Perspectives on the emergence of new disciplines. Paris, Mouton.
41.
Martins, H. 1972 “The Kuhnian `revolution' and its implications for sociology”, in: T. Nossiteret al. (eds). Imagination and precision in the social sciences. London, Faber and Faber.
42.
Mulkay, M.J.1975“Three models of scientific development”, Sociological Review23:509-526.
43.
Mulkay, M.J.; Edge, D.O.1973“Cognitive, technical and social factors in the emergence of radio astronomy”, Social Science Information12:25-61.
44.
Mulkay, M.J.; Gilbert, G.N.; Woolgar, S.1975“Problem areas and research networks in science”, Sociology9: 187-203.
45.
Mullins, N.1972“The development of a scientific speciality: The Phage Group and the origins of molecular biology”, Minerva10:51-82.
46.
Munevar, G. 1982 Radical knowledge. Amersham, Avebury.
47.
Ollman, B. 1971 Alienation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
48.
Parijs, P. van 1981 Evolutionary explanation in the social sciences. London, Tavistock.
49.
Pickering, A. 1980 “The role of interests in high energy physics: The choice between charm and colour”, in: K. Knorret al. (eds). The social process of scientific investigation. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 4, Dordrecht, Boston, Mass. Reidel.
50.
Pinch, T. 1980 “Theoreticians and the production of experimental anomaly”, in: K. Knorret al. (eds). The Social process of scientific investigation. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 4, Dordrecht, Boston, Mass. Reidel.
51.
Popper, K.R. 1959 The logic of scientific discovery. London, Hutchinson.
52.
Popper, K.R. 1972 Objective knowledge. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
53.
Porter, R. 1977 The making of geology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
54.
Turner, S.P. 1980 Sociological explanation as translation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
55.
Wright, G.H. von 1971 Explanation and understanding. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
56.
Whitley, R.1978“Types of science, organizational strategies and patterns of work in research laboratories in different scientific fields”, Social Science Information17:427-447.
57.
Whitley, R. 1982 “The establishment and structure of the sciences as reputational organisations”, in: N. Eliaset al (eds). Scientific establishments and hierarchies. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 6, Dordrecht, Boston, Mass., Reidel.
58.
Woolgar, S.1981“Interests and explanation in the social studies of science”, Social Studies of Science11: 365-394.