In this short commentary, I discuss Olof Hallonsten’s argument against science evaluation. My invitation is to place the discussion in a wider frame that takes into account the many challenges scientists and scientific institutions face today. I argue in favor of a ‘start from the middle’ approach that gives emphasis to the inner principle of valorization of the scientific endeavor.
BrighentiAM (2018) The social life of measures: Conceptualizing measure-value environments. Theory, Culture & Society35(1): 23–44.
2.
FoucaultM (1975) Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.
3.
FoucaultM (2018) Les Aveux de la chair. Histoire de la sexualité IV. Paris: Gallimard.
4.
HallonstenO (2021) Stop evaluating science: A historical-sociological argument. Social Science Information60(1): 7–26.
5.
LakatosI (1978) The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
MotterliniM (ed.) (1999) For and Against Method: Including Lakatos’s Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
PeirceCS (1955) Philosophical Writings. New York: Dover Publications.
