This article examines why Spanish fathers still make little use of the family-friendly measures (FFM) they are entitled to. Amartya Sen’s capabilities approach is applied to the analysis of this agency gap in work-family balance (WFB). Males wishing to balance work and family face a series of barriers that inhibit their use of FFM, creating a gap between the theoretical right to use these measures and the real ability to do so. We illustrate this broader issue with qualitative information collected from a Spanish sample (59 semi-structured interviews with 43 salaried fathers, 6 salaried mothers and 10 human resources (HR) managers). Three types of factors (conversion factors) that enhance/limit the capabilities of fathers to use reconciliation measures were considered: individual factors, policy and societal factors, and factors related to the organizational culture of workplaces.
AbrilPJurado-GuerreroTMonferrerJ (2015) Paternidades en construcción. In Padres y madres corresponsables. Una utopía real. Madrid: Catarata.
2.
AdlerMALenzK (2017) Introduction. In: AdlerMALenzK (eds), Father Involvement in the Early Years. An International Comparison of Policy and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press.
3.
AndersonEMcCormackM (2018) Inclusive masculinity theory: Overview, reflection and refinement. Journal of Gender Studies27(5): 547–561.
4.
AumannKGalinskyEMatosK (2011) The New Male Mystique. Hillsborough: Families and Work Institute.
5.
BeckerGS (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal75(299): 493–517.
6.
Blair-LoyM (2003) Competing Devotions: Career and Family among Women Executives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BrowneJDeakinSWilkinsonF (2004) Capabilities, social rights and European market integration. In: SalaisRVilleneuveR (eds) Europe and the Politics of Capabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205–221.
8.
BurnettSGatrellCCooperCSparrowP (2013) Fathers at work: A ghost in the organizational machine. Gender, Work & Organization20(6): 632–646.
9.
CastroCPazosM (2016) Parental leave policy and gender equality in Europe. Feminist Economics22(3): 51–73.
10.
CharlesMBradleyK (2009) Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology114(4): 924–976.
11.
ConnellR (1995) Masculinities (2nd ed.). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
12.
CorrellSJBenardSPaikI (2007) Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty?American Journal of Sociology112(5): 1297–1339.
13.
CrockerDA (2008) Ethics of Global Development: Agency, Capability and Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
EaglyAH (1987) Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
Fernández-CornejoJABritwumAOEscotLOdoiAPalomo-VadilloMTDel Pozo-GarcíaEAyiteyD (2019) Penalizing fathers who use family-friendly measures. A comparative study with university students from Ghana and Spain. Social Science Research82: 204–220.
16.
Fernández-CornejoJADel Pozo-GarcíaEEscotLCastellanos-SerranoC (2018) Can an egalitarian reform in the parental leave system reduce the motherhood labor penalty? Some evidence from Spain. Revista Española de Sociología27(3): 45–64.
17.
Fernández-CornejoJAEscotL (2018) Brecha madre-padre en el uso de las medidas de conciliación y su efecto sobre las carreras profesionales de las madres. Cuaderno de Trabajo de la Facultad de Estudios Estadísticos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Available at: https://estudiosestadisticos.ucm.es/data/cont/docs/12-2018-06-22-CT_02_2018.pdf
18.
Fernández-CornejoJAEscotLMariaraJKinuthiaBKEydalGBBjarnasonT (2016) Gender differences in young adults’ inclination to sacrifice career opportunities in the future for family reasons: Comparative study with university students from Nairobi, Madrid, and Reykjavik. Journal of Youth Studies19(4): 457–482.
19.
Fernández-LozanoIGonzálezMJJurado-GuerreroTMartínez-PastorJI (2019) The hidden cost of flexibility: A factorial survey experiment on job promotion. European Sociological Review: jcz059.
20.
FoxEPascallGWarrenT (2009) Work-family policies, participation, and practices: Fathers and childcare in Europe. Community, Work & Family12: 313–326.
21.
GregoryAMilnerS (2011) What is ‘new’ about fatherhood? The social construction of fatherhood in France and the UK. Men and Masculinities14(5): 588–606.
22.
HabibC (2012) The transition to fatherhood: A literature review exploring paternal involvement with identity theory. Journal of Family Studies18(2/3): 103–120.
23.
HobsonB (2011) The agency gap in work-life balance: Applying Sen’s capabilities framework within European contexts. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society18(2): 147–167.
24.
HobsonB (2013) Introduction: Capabilities and agency for work-life balance, a multidimensional framework. In: HobsonB (ed.) Worklife Balance: The Agency and Capabilities Gap. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
HobsonBFahlénS (2009) Competing scenarios for European fathers: Applying Sen’s capabilities and agency framework to work–family balance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science624: 214–633.
26.
HobsonBMorganD (2002) Introduction: Making men into fathers. In: HobsonB (ed.) Making Men into Fathers. Men, Masculinities and the Social Politics of Fatherhood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
HobsonBOlahLS (2006) Birthstrikes? Agency and capabilities in the reconciliation of employment and family. Journal Marriage & Family Review39(3/4): 197–227.
28.
HodgesMBudigMJ (2010) Who gets the daddy bonus? Markers of hegemonic masculinity and the impact of first-time fatherhood on men’s earnings. Gender & Society24(6): 717–745.
29.
KaufmanG (2013) Superdads. How Fathers Balance Work and Family in the 21st Century. New York: University Press.
30.
KimmelM (2017) The Gendered Society (6th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
KvandeEBrandthB (2017) Fathers on leave alone in Norway: Changes and continuities. In: O’BrienMWallK (eds) Comparative Perspectives on Work-Life Balance and Gender Equality. Fathers on Leave. New York: Springer.
32.
LambME (2010) How do fathers influence children’s development? Let me count the ways. In: LambME (ed.) The Role of the Father in Child Development. New York: Wiley, pp. 1–26.
33.
MeilGRomero-BalsasPRogero-GarcíaJ (2017) Why parents take unpaid parental leave. Evidence from Spain. In: CesnuiytèVLückDWidmerED (eds) Family Continuity and Change. Contemporary European Perspectives. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
34.
Moss-RacusinCAPhelanJERudmanLA (2010) When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity11(2): 140–151.
35.
O’BrienMMossP (2010) Fathers, work and family policies in Europe. In: LambME (ed.) The Role of the Father in Child Development. New York: Wiley, pp. 551–577.
OlmsteadSBFutrisTGPasleyK (2009) An exploration of married and divorced, nonresident men’s perceptions and organization of their father role identity. Fathering7(3): 249–268.
38.
Pérez-CaramésA (2014) Family policies in Spain. In: RobilaM (ed.) Handbook of Family Policies Across the Globe. New York: Springer, pp. 175–194.
Romero-BalsasPMuntanyola-SauraDRogero-GarcíaJ (2013) Decision-making factors within paternity and parental leaves: Why Spanish fathers take time off from work. Gender, Work and Organization20(6): 678–691.
41.
RudmanLAMescherK (2013) Penalizing men who request a family leave: Is flexibility stigma a femininity stigma?Journal of Social Issues69(2): 322–340.
42.
SenA (1989) Development as capability expansion. Journal of Development Planning19: 41–58.
43.
SenA (1993) Capability and well-being. In: NussbaumMSenA (eds) The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 30–53.
44.
SenA (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
Schoppe-SullivanSJAltenburgerLELeeMABowerDJKamp DushCM (2015) Who are the gatekeepers? Predictors of maternal gatekeeping. Parenting15(3): 166–186.
46.
SeizMGonzálezMJJurado-GuerreroTLapuertaIMartín-GarcíaT (2019) Non-normative couples in Spain: Mothers career commitment, fathers work arrangements, and egalitarian ideologies. In: GrunowDEvertssonM (eds) New Parents in Europe Work-Care Practices, Gender Norms and Family Policies. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 89–103.
47.
StrykerS (1968) Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and Family30: 558–564.
48.
StrykerS (1987) Identity theory: Development and extensions. In: YardleyKHonessT (eds) Self and Identity: Psychosocial Perspective. London: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 89–103.
49.
SudgenR (1993) Welfare, resources, and capabilities: A review. Journal of Economic Literature31(4): 1947–1962.
50.
TimmermansSTavoryI (2012) Theory construction in qualitative research from grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory30: 167–186.
51.
ValienteC (2013) Gender equality policymaking in Spain (2008–11): Losing momentum. In: FieldBNBottiA (eds) Politics and Society in Contemporary Spain: From Zapatero to Rajoy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 179–195.
52.
VandelloJABossonJK (2013) Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men & Masculinity14(2): 101–113.
53.
WilliamsJCBlair-LoyMBerdahlJL (2013) Cultural schemas, social class, and the flexibility stigma. Journal of Social Issues69(2): 209–234.
