The idea of unintended consequences of social action constitutes one of the core meta-assumptions of new economic sociology. Yet neither its US nor its European branch seem to make a direct statement about this. This state of affairs appears to be the result of various cumulative circumstances, such as the role played by the competition from other meta-assumptions which address similar or related issues and the rather general treatment of the unintended consequences within the field. This article takes a closer look and tries to establish whether the approach to the unintended in the US and European new economic sociologies is indeed so general. It concludes that the source of the low visibility of the unintended consequences as a fundamental problem for new economic sociology is not the fact that this is not granted proper systematization. The problem rather lies in the lack of awareness and cumulative knowledge about the unintended consequences as a main sociological problem that was already taken up in sociology.
AspersPDoddNAnderbergE (2015) ‘Introduction’. In AspersPDoddN (eds) Re-Imagining New Economic Sociology. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1–33.
2.
AokiM (1997) Unintended fit: Organizational evolution and government design of institutions in Japan. In: AokiMKimHKOkuno-FujiwaraM (eds) The Role of Government in East Asian Economic Development: Comparative Institutional Analysis. Oxford: Clarendon, 233–253.
3.
AokiM (2001) Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
AydinonatE (2008) The Invisible Hand in Economics: How Economists Explain Unintended Social Consequences. London: Routledge
5.
BaertP (1991) Unintended consequences: A typology and examples. International Sociology6(2): 201–210.
6.
BeckUBonssWLauC.2003. The theory of reflexive modernization: Problematic, hypotheses and research programme. Theory, Culture & Society20(2) 1–33.
7.
BeckertJ (1996) What is sociological about economic sociology? Uncertainty and the embeddedness of economic action. Theory and Society25(6): 803–840.
8.
BeckertJ (2006) Jens Beckert answers ten questions about economic sociology. Economic Sociology – The European Electronic Newsletter 7(3): 34–39.
9.
BeckertJ (2013) The uncertainty of modernity. In: FlickC (ed.) Dealing with Downturns: Strategies in Uncertain Times. Munich: Convoco! Editions, 47–68.
10.
BeckertJ (2016) Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
BoudonR (1982) The Unintended Consequences of Social Action. London: Macmillan.
12.
BoudonR (1990) Boudon replies to Elster. In: ClarkJModgilCModgilS (eds) Robert Merton: Consensus and Controversy. London/New York: Falmer Press, 136–137.
13.
BoudonRBourricaudF (2003[1982]) A Critical Dictionary of Sociology. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis e-Library.
14.
CallonM (1998a) (ed.) The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers/The Sociological Review.
15.
CallonM (1998b) An essay on framing and overflowing: Economic externalities revisited by sociology. In: CallonM (ed.) The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers/The Sociological Review, 244–269.
16.
CallonM (2005) Why virtualism paves the way to political impotence: A reply to Daniel Miller’s critique ofThe Laws of the Markets. Economic Sociology – European Electronic Newspaper6(2): 3–20.
17.
CallonM (2007) What does it mean to say that economics is performative? In: MacKenzieDMuniesaFSiuL (eds) Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 311–357.
18.
CallonMLascoumesPBarthesY (2009) The democratization of democracy. In: CallonMLascoumesPBarthesY (eds) Acting in an Uncertain World. An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press, 225–254.
19.
CliftB (2014) Comparative Political Economy: States, Markets and Global Capitalism. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
CochoyF (2014) A theory of ‘agencing’: On Michel Callon’s contribution to organizational knowledge and practice. In: AdlerPdu GayPMorganGReedM (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Sociology, Social Theory, and Organization Studies: Contemporary Currents. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 106–124.
21.
CowenT (1998) Do economists use social mechanisms to explain? In: HedströmPSwedbergR (eds) Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 125–146.
22.
CzarniawskaBLöfgrenO (eds) (2013) Coping with Excess: How Organizations, Communities and Individuals Manage Overflows. Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
23.
DalozJ-P (2011) Elitist consumption: Revisiting the question of utilitarian vs. symbolic motives. In: MicaAPeisertAWinczorekJ (eds) Sociology and the Unintended: Robert Merton Revisited. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 63–73.
24.
DaviesW (2010) The politics of externalities: Neo-liberalism, rising powers and property rights. Rising Powers Working Paper.
25.
de ZwartZ (2015) Unintended but not unanticipated consequences. Theory and Society44(3): 283–297.
26.
DobbinF (2007) Economic sociology. In: BryantCDPeckDL (eds) Twenty-First Century Sociology: A Reference Handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 319–331.
27.
ElsterJ (1978) Logic and Society. Contradictions and Possible Worlds. Chichester/London: John Wiley & Sons.
28.
ElsterJ (1983) Explaining Technical Change: A Case Study in the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press/Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
29.
ElsterJ (1990) Merton’s functionalism and the unintended consequences of action. In: ClarkJModgilCModgilS (eds) Robert Merton: Consensus and Controversy. London/New York/Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press, 129–135.
30.
ElsterJ (2007) Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
GiddensA (1986[1984]) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press / Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
32.
GranovetterM (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology91(3): 481–510.
33.
GuillénMFCollinsREnglandPMeyerM (2005[2002]) The revival of economic sociology. In GuillénMFCollinsREnglandPMeyerM (eds) The New Economic Sociology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1–32.
34.
HirschmanAO (1973[1963]) Journeys Towards Progress: Studies in Economic Policy-making in Latin America. New York: Norton.
35.
HirschmanAO (1991) The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy. Cambridge. MA/London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
36.
HirschmanAO (1995) A Propensity to Self-subversion. Cambridge, MA/London, Harvard University Press.
37.
JacksonG (2005) Contested boundaries: Ambiguity and creativity in the evolution of the German codetermination. In: StreeckWThelenK (eds) Beyond Continuity: Explorations in the Dynamics of Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 228–254.
38.
JacksonGDeegR (2012) The long-term trajectories of institutional change in European capitalism. Journal of European Public Policy19(8) 1109–1125.
39.
JacksonGMiyajimaH (2007) Introduction: The diversity and change of corporate governance in Japan. In: AokiMJacksonGMiyajimaH (eds) Corporate Governance in Japan: Institutional Change and Organizational Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–47.
40.
MackenzieD (2007) Is economics performative? Option theory and the construction of derivative markets. In: MackenzieDMuniesaFSiuL (eds) Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 54–86.
41.
MacKenzieDMilloY (2003) Constructing a market, performing theory: The historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange. American Journal of Sociology109(1): 107–145.
42.
McFallL (2009) Devices and desires: How useful is the ‘new’ new economic sociology for understanding market attachment?Sociology Compass3(2): 267–282.
43.
McFallLOssandónJ (2014) What’s new in the ‘new, new economic sociology’ and should organisation studies care? In: AdlerPdu GayPMorganGReedM (eds) Oxford Handbook of Sociology, Social Theory and Organization Studies: Contemporary Currents. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 510–533.
44.
MertonR (1936) The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review1: 894–904.
45.
MertonRK (1998) Unanticipated consequences and kindred sociological ideas: A personal gloss. In: MongardiniCTabboniS (eds) Robert K Merton and Contemporary Sociology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 295–318.
46.
MertonRCBodieZ (2005) Design of financial systems: Towards a synthesis of function and structure. Journal of Investment Management3(1): 1–23.
47.
MicaA (2014) Weber’s ‘essential paradox of social action’: What can sociology of the unintended learn from public policy analysis?Profilaktyka Społeczna i Resocjalizacja23: 71–95.
48.
MicaA (2015) Unintended consequences: History of the concept. In: WrightJD (editor-in-chief) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition.Vol. 24. Oxford: Elsevier, 744–749.
49.
MicaAPeisertAWinczorekJ (2011) Introduction. In: MicaAPeisertAWinczorekJ (eds) Sociology and the Unintended: Robert Merton Revisited. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 9–26.
50.
MoroniS (2012) Land-use planning and the question of unintended consequences. In: AnderssonDE (ed.) The Spatial Market Process. Advances in Austrian Economics, Vol. 16. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 265–288.
51.
MoschellaMTsingouE (2013) Conclusions: too little, too slow? In: MoschellaMTsingouE (eds) Great Expectations, Slow Transformations: Incremental Change in Post-crisis Regulation. Colchester: ECPR Press, 193–216.
52.
NozickR (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
53.
NozickR (1994) Invisible-hand explanations. The American Economic Review84(2) 314–318. Papers and Proceedings of the Hundred and Sixth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association.
54.
PellizzoniL (2015) Ontological Politics in a Disposable World: The New Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge.
55.
PhelpsNA (2015) Sequel to Suburbia Glimpses of America’s Post-Suburban Future. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
56.
PortesA (2000) The hidden abode: Sociology as analysis of the unexpected: 1999 presidential address. American Sociological Review65: 1–18.
57.
PortesA (2010a) Economic Sociology: A Systematic Inquiry. Princeton and Oxford, Princeton University Press.
58.
PortesA (2010b) Reflections on a common theme: Establishing the phenomenon, adumbration, and ideal types. In: CalhounC (ed.) Robert K. Merton: Sociology of Science and Sociology as Science. New York/Chichester: Columbia University Press, 94–112.
59.
StreeckW (2009) Re-forming Capitalism: Institutional Change in the German Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60.
StreeckWThelenK (eds) (2005) Beyond Continuity: Explorations in the Dynamics of Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61.
SwedbergR (1990) Jon Elster. In: Economics and Sociology: Redefining Their Boundaries: Conversations with Economists and Sociologists, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 233–248.
62.
SwedbergR (2011) Economic sociology: A systematic inquiry (review). Social Forces89(3): 1057–1058.
63.
SztompkaP (2011) Existential uncertainty and its remedies. On the shoulders of Robert K. Merton. In: MicaAPeisertAWinczorekJ (eds), Sociology and the Unintended: Robert Merton Revisited. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 75–87.
Ullmann-MargalitE (1997) The invisible hand and the cunning of reason. Social Research64(2): 181–198.
67.
WhelanFG (2015) The Political Thought of Hume and His Contemporaries: Enlightenment Projects, Vol. 2. New York/Oxon: Routledge.
68.
WhittakerJ (2006) Reflecting on Callon with a case of fair trade coffee. Discussion Papers in Management, no. 06/06. University of Exeter, UK.
69.
ZelizerV (2010) Culture and uncertainty. In: CalhounC (ed.) Robert K. Merton: Sociology of Science and Sociology as Science. New York/Chichester: Columbia University Press, 94–112.
70.
ZingerleA (1998) The unanticipated consequences of action: Sociological and ethical aspects. In: MongardiniCTabboniS (eds) Robert K. Merton and Contemporary Sociology. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 177–186.
