Differential impact of independent and interdependent views of the self on the use of consensus and heterogeneity information: The case of validity of groups’ decisions

Abstract

French

In this article, we analyse the moderating effect of the activation of independent and interdependent views of the self on the use of heterogeneity and consensus information in the attribution of validity to group decisions. In two experimental studies, we present evidence showing that the participants, when primed with an interdependent view of the self, make no distinction between homogeneous or heterogeneous information regarding group composition while attributing validity to group decisions. Indeed, they base their validity attribution mainly on consensus information. In contrast, when primed with an independent view of the self, they make use of variability information as they attribute a greater validity to a more heterogeneous and consensual group and a lower validity to a group depicted as homogeneous and consensual. Results are discussed in light of the differential utility of consensus and heterogeneity information, as well as participants’ self-knowledge within the processes of validation of group decisions.

Keywords

consensus information heterogeneity information independence interdependence validation of group decisions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aaker

Lee

(2001) ‘I’ seek pleasures and ‘we’ avoid pains: The role of self- regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research 28: 33–49.

Aaker

Maheswaran

(1997) The effect of cultural orientation on persuasion. The Journal of Consumer Research 24: 315–328.

Asch

(1952) Social Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Augustinova

Drozda-Senkowska

Lasticova

(2004) La confiance dans les décisions collectives: Une question de garanties [Confidence in collective decisions: A question of guarantees]. Année Psychologique 104: 649–681.

Badea

Brauer

Rubin

(2012) The effects of winning and losing on perceived group variability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48: 1094–1099.

Batel

Castro

(2009) A social representations approach to the communication between different spheres: An analysis of the impacts of two discursive formats. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 39: 415–433.

Bechtoldt

De Dreu

CKW

Nijstad

Choi

(2010) Motivated information processing, social tuning, and group creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99: 622–637.

Berkowitz

(1957) Effects of perceived dependency relationships upon conformity to group expectations. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology 55: 350–354.

Bohner

Dykema-Engblade

Tindale

Meisenhelder

(2008) Framing of minority and majority source information in persuasion: When and how ‘consensus implies correctness’. Social Psychology 39: 108–116.

10.

Bond

Smith

(1996) Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin 119: 111–137.

11.

Brewer

Gardner

(1996) Who is this ‘we’? Levels of collective identity and self-representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 83–93.

12.

Chambres

Bonin

Izaute

Marescaux

(2002) Metacognition triggered by a social aspect of expertise. In: Chambres

Izaute

Marescaux

(eds) Metacognition: Process, Function and Use. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 153–168.

13.

Cialdini

Goldstein

(2004) Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology 55: 591–621.

14.

Cross

Hardin

Gercek-Swing

(2011) The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review 15: 142–179.

15.

Darke

Chaiken

Bohner

Einwiller

Erb

H-P

Hazlewood

(1998) Accuracy motivation, consensus information, and the law of large numbers: Effects on attitude judgment in the absence of argumentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24: 1205–1215.

16.

Deutsch

Gerard

(1955) A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology 51: 629–636.

17.

Di Vesta

(1959) Effects of confidence and motivation on susceptibility to informational social influence. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology 59: 204–219.

18.

Earley

Gibson

(1998) Taking stock in our progress on individualism-collectivism: 100 years of solidarity and community. Journal of Management 24: 265–304.

19.

Festinger

(1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7: 117–140.

20.

Frager

(1970) Conformity and anticonformity in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 15: 203–210.

21.

Gardner

Gabriel

Lee

(1999) ‘I’ value freedom, but ‘we’ value relationship: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgement. Psychological Science 10: 321–326.

22.

Gigerenzer

Brighton

(2009) Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science 1: 107–143.

23.

Goethals

(1976) An attributional analysis of some social influence phenomena. In: Harvey

Ickes

Kidd

(eds) New Directions in Attribution Research (vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 291–310.

24.

Goethals

Darley

(1977) Social comparison theory: An attributional approach. In: Suls

Miller

(eds) Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Washington, DC: Hemisphere, 259–278.

25.

Goethals

Klein

(2000) Interpreting and inventing social reality: Attributional and constructive elements in social comparison. In: Suls

Wheeler

(eds) The Handbook of Social Comparison: Theory and Research. New York: Plenum, 23–44.

26.

Goethals

Nelson

(1973) Similarity in the influence process: The belief–value distinction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 25: 117–122.

27.

Goethals

Allison

Frost

(1979) Perceptions of the magnitude and diversity of social support. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 15: 570–581.

28.

Hardin

Higgins

(1996) Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In: Higgins

Sorrentino

(eds), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: The Interpersonal Context, Vol. 3. New York: Guilford, 28–84.

29.

Janis

(1972) Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Oxford, UK: Houghton Mifflin.

30.

Krueger

(2000) The projective perception of the social world: A building block of social comparison processes. In Suls

Wheeler

(eds), The Handbook of Social Comparison: Theory and Research. New York: Plenum, 323–351.

31.

Kruglanski

(1989) Lay Epistemics and Human Knowledge: Cognitive and Motivational Bases. New York: Springer.

32.

Kruglanski

(2004) The Psychology of Closed Mindedness. New York: Psychology Press.

33.

Kühnen

Hannover

(2000) Assimilation and contrast in social comparisons as a consequence of self-construal activation. European Journal of Social Psychology 30: 799–811.

34.

Kühnen

Oyserman

(2002) Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: Cognitive consequences of salient self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38: 492–499.

35.

Lascu

D-N

Zinkhan

(1999) Consumer conformity: Review and applications for marketing theory and practice. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 7: 1–12.

36.

Levine

(1999) Solomon Asch’s legacy for group research. Personality and Social Psychology Review 3: 358–364.

37.

Lopes

Vala

Garcia-Marques

(2007) Social validation of everyday knowledge: Heterogeneity and consensus functionality. Group Dynamics: Theory Research and Practice 11: 223–239.

38.

Lopes

Vala

Oberlé

Drozda-Senkowska

(2014) Validation of groups’ outputs: Why and when group heterogeneity is relevant. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale 27: 35–49.

39.

Markus

Kitayama

(1991a) Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review 98: 224–253.

40.

Markus

Kitayama

(1991b) Cultural variation in the self concept. In Goethals

Strauss

(eds) Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Self. New York: Springer-Verlag, 18–48.

41.

Markus

Kitayama

(2003). Culture, self, and the reality of the social. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory 14: 277–283.

42.

Moscovici

(1980) Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In: Berkowitz

(ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press 13: 209–239.

43.

Moscovici

Doise

(1992) Dissension et Consensus. Paris: Seuil.

44.

(2013) Do collectivists conform more than individualists? Cross-cultural differences in compliance and internalization. Social Behavior and Personality 41: 981-994.

45.

Oyserman

Coon

Kemmelmeier

(2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 128: 3–72.

46.

Reckman

Goethals

(1973) Deviancy and group-orientation as determinants of group composition preferences. Sociometry 1: 1–5.

47.

Singelis

(1994) The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin 20: 580–591.

48.

Thompson

Levine

Messick

(1999) Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

49.

Triandis

(1989) The self and social behaviour in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96: 506–520.

50.

Triandis

Gelfand

(1998) Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 118–128.

51.

Triandis

Bontempo

Villareal

Asai

Lucca

(1988) Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54: 323–338.

52.

Vala

Garcia-Marques

Gouveia-Pereira

Lopes

(1998) Validation of polemical social representations: Introducing the intergroup differentiation of heterogeneity. Social Science Information 37: 469–492.

53.

Vala

Drozda-Senkowska

Oberlé

Lopes

Silva

(2011) Group heterogeneity and social validation of everyday knowledge: The mediating role of perceived group participation. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 14: 347–362.

54.

Verplanken

Holland

(2002) Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82: 434–447.

55.

Ybarra

Trafimow

(1998) How priming the private self or collective self affects the relative weights of attitudes and subjective norms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24: 362–370.