The article offers an in-depth analysis of a neo-Durkheimian class framework. Developed primarily by David Grusky, the research perspective in question stems from a critique of certain established class approaches, in particular those that are based on the so called by the exponents of the perspective under consideration, ‘big classes’. By contrast, the approach concerned aims to substitute microclasses (distinguished at an occupational level) for the said macroclasses, drawing to that end on some ideas of Emile Durkheim. The prime premise of the approach in question is demonstrated to be false: from a dialectical standpoint, there is no inevitable opposition between classes analysed at the different levels of overall societal structure. Grusky’s framework is plagued by other major weaknesses as well.
DurkheimE (1951 [1897]) Suicide: A study in sociology, trans. SpauldingJASimpsonG. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
2.
DurkheimE (1956 [1911]) Jugements de valeur et jugements de réalité. Revue de métaphysique et de morale19: 437–453.
3.
DurkheimE (1960 [1893]) The division of labor in society, trans. SimpsonG. New York, NY: Macmillan.
4.
EmmisonMWesternM (1990) Social class and social identity: A comment on Marshall et al. Sociology24: 241–253.
5.
FeathermanDLHauserRM (1978) Opportunity and change. New York, NY: Academic Press.
6.
GoldthorpeJH (2000) Social class and the differentiation of employment contracts. In: GoldthorpeJH (ed.) On Sociology: Numbers, narratives, and the integration of research and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press
7.
GranovetterMTillyC (1988) Inequality and labor processes. In: SmelserNJ (ed.) Handbook of sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 175–221.
8.
GruskyD (in collaboration with GalescuG) (2005) Foundations of class analysis. A neoDurkheimian framework for class analysis. In: WrightEO (ed.) Approaches to Class Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
GruskyDSorensenJ (1998) Can class analysis be salvaged?American Journal of Sociology103: 1187–1234.
10.
GruskyDWeedenK (2001) Decomposition without death: A research agenda for a new class analysis. Acta Sociologica44: 203–18.
11.
HauserRMWarrenJR (1997) Socioeconomic indexes of occupational status: A review, update, and critique. In: RafertyA (ed.) Sociological Methodology. Cambridge: Blackwell, 177–298.
12.
International Labour Office. (1990 (1968)). International Standard Classification of Occupations: IC-88. Geneva: ILO.
13.
MarshallGRoseDNewbyHVoglerC (1988) Social class in modern Britain. London: Unwin Hyman.
14.
MarxKEngelsF (1978 [1848]). Manifesto of the Communist Party. In: TuckerRC (ed.) The Marx–Engels reader (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Norton.
15.
McGovernPHillSMillsCWhiteM (2007) Market, class, and employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
ParkinF (1992) Durkheim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
ParsonsT (1954) An analytical approach to the theory of social stratification. In: Essays in sociological theory by Talcott Parsons. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 69–88.
18.
Phelps BrownH (1979) The inequality of pay. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
StoneKVW (1975) The origin of job structures in the steel industry. In EdwardsRCGordonDMReichR (eds) Labor market segmentation: A research report to the US Department of Labor. Cambridge, MA: Center for Education Policy Research, Harvard University, 1–32.
20.
SurensenJBGruskyD (1996) The structure of career mobility in microscopic perspective. In: BaronJNGruskyDBTreimanDJ (eds) Social differentiation and social inequality. Boulder, CO: Westview, 83–114.
21.
TittenbrunJ (1992) Der polnische Weg zum Kapitalismus. Prokla: Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft22(4): 604–621.
22.
TittenbrunJ (1993) The collapse of ‘real socialism’ in Poland. London–New York: Janus Publishing.
23.
TittenbrunJ (1995) The managerial revolution revisited: The case of privatisation in Poland. Capital and Class55: 21–32.
24.
TittenbrunJ (2008) Z deszczu pod rynnę. Meandry polskiej prywatyzacji [From the frying pan into the fire: The menders of Poland’s Privatisation], 4 vols. Poznan: Zysk.
TittenbrunJ (2011b) Relations of non-economic ownership as the basis of identification of social estates. Studiae Historiae Oeconomica, 28(9): 2–25.
27.
TittenbrunJ (2013) Anti-capital: Human, social and cultural. The mesmerising misnomers. Farnham: Ashgate.
28.
TittenbrunJ (2014) Concepts of capital: The commodification of social life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
29.
TittenbrunJ (forthcoming) From Marx to Warner: Class and stratification under scrutiny.
30.
US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2004) U.S. Bureau of the Census. USA: EEOC.
31.
WeberM (1968 [1922]) Economy and Society. New York, Bedminster Press.
32.
WeedenKAGruskyDB (2004) Are there any big classes at all?Research in Social Stratification and Mobility22: 3–56.
33.
WeedenKAGruskyDB (2005) The case for a new class map. American Journal of Sociology111: 141–212.
34.
WeiningerEB (2005) Foundations of Pierre Bourdieu’s class analysis. In: WrightEO (ed.) Approaches to Class Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 93–129.
35.
WilenskyHL (1966) Class, class consciousness, and American workers. In: HaberW (ed.) Labor in a changing America. New York: Basic, 12–44.
36.
WrightEO (2005) Approaches to class analysis. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.
