Self-centred based explanations such as invisible-hand accounts look like armchair constructions with no relevance to the real world. Whether and how they nonetheless provide an insight into social reality is a puzzling matter. Philip Pettit’s idea of self-interest virtually bearing on choices offers the prospect of a solution. In order to assess the latter we first distinguish between three variants of invisible-hand explanations, namely: a normative, an historical and a theoretical one. We then show that, while the model of virtual self-interest is a helpful gloss on each variant, it may not convincingly succeed, pace Pettit, in reconciling the economic mind with the common mind.
AndersonE (2000) Beyond homo economicus: New developments in theories of social norms. Philosophy and Public Affairs29(2): 170–200.
2.
AydinonatE (2008) The invisible hand in economics: How economists explain unintended social consequences. London and New York: Routledge.
3.
BarryN (1982) The tradition of spontaneous order. Literature of Liberty5(2): 7–58.
4.
BrennanGPettitP (1993) Hands invisible and intangible. Synthese94: 191–225.
5.
BrennanGPettitP (2005) The feasibility issue. In: JacksonFSmithM (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 258–279.
6.
BridelP (2014) Why is there money? Or yet a new attempt at solving the Hahn Problem. Œconomica (4): 623–635.
7.
BungeM (1997) Mechanism and explanation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences27(4): 410–465.
8.
ElsterJ (1983) Sour grapes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
ElsterJ (1986) Further thoughts on Marxism, functionalism and game theory. In: RoemerJ (ed.) Analytical Marxism. Cambridge University Press, 202–220.
10.
ElsterJ (1989) Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
ElsterJ (2009) Le désintérêt: Traité critique de l’homme économique. Paris: Seuil.
12.
GraeberD (2011) Debt: The first 5000 years. Brooklyn and London: Melville House.
13.
HallerM (2000) Carl Menger’s theory of invisible-hand explanations. Social Science Information39(4): 529–565.
14.
HallerM (2004) Mixing economics and ethics: Carl Menger vs Gustav Von Schmoller.Social science information43(1): 5–33.
15.
HausmanDMcPhersonMS (2006) Economic analysis, moral philosophy, and public policy (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
HayekFA (1966) Lecture on a master mind: Dr Bernard Mandeville. Proceedings of the British Academy52: 125–141.
17.
HopflHM (1978) From savage to Scotsman: Conjectural history in the Scottish Enlightenment. Journal of British Studies17(2): 19–40.
18.
HumeD (2000 [1740]) A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Norton & Norton / Oxford University Press.
19.
KellerR (1994) On Language Change: The invisible hand in language. London and New York: Routledge.
20.
KuranT (1995) Private Truths, Public Lies: The social consequences of preference falsification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
MäkiU (1990a) Scientific realism and Austrian explanation. Review of Political Economy2: 310–344.
22.
MäkiU (1990b) Mengerian economics in realist perspective. History of Political Economy22 (annual supplement): 289–310.
23.
MäkiU (1997) Universals and the Methodenstreit: A reexamination of Carl Menger’s conception of economics as an exact science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science28: 475–495.
24.
MandevilleB (1988 [1732]) The Fable of the Bees or Private Vices, Public Benefits. KayeFB (ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
25.
MengerC (1892) On the origins of money, FoleyC (transl.). Economic Journal2: 239–255.
26.
MengerC (1985 [1883]) Investigations into The Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics, FrancisJN (transl.). New York: New York University Press.
27.
MengerC (2007 [1871]) Principles of Economics. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
28.
NozickR (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell, Basic Books.
29.
PettitP (1993) The Common Mind, An essay on psychology, society, and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
PettitP (1996) Functional explanation and virtual selection. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science47: 291–302.
31.
PettitP (1998) The invisible hand. In: DavisJWadeBHandsDMäkiU (eds) The Handbook of Economic Methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 256–259.
32.
PettitP (2000) Rational choice, functional selection, and empty black boxes. Journal of Economic Methodology7(1): 33–57.
33.
PettitP (2001) The virtual reality of Homo Economicus, In: MäkiU (ed.) The Economic World View. Studies in the ontology of economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 75–97.
34.
PettitP (2007) Resilience as the explanandum of social theory. In: ShapiroIBediS (eds) Contingency. New York: New York University Press, 79–96.
35.
RosenbergA (1995) Philosophy of social science. Boulder, CO: Westview/HarperCollins.
36.
SchmidH B (2005) Beyond self-goal choice: Amartya Sen’s analysis of the structure of commitment and the role of shared desires. Economics & Philosophy21(1): 51–63.
37.
SchmidtzD (1990) Justifying the state. Ethics101: 89–102.
38.
SearleJ (1995) The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.
39.
SearleJ (2010) Making the Social World: The structure of human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
SenA (2002) Goals, commitment, and identity. In: Rationality and Freedom, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 206–224.
41.
SmitJPBuekensFdu PlessisS (2011) What is money? An alternative to Searle’s institutional facts. Economics and Philosophy27: 1–22.
42.
SmithA (1982 [1759]) Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, Vol. 1: The Theory of Moral Sentiments (Glasgow edition), RaphaelDDMacfieAL (eds). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
43.
StewartD (1858) Collected Works, Vol. X: Biographical Memoirs of Adam Smith, L.L.D., of William Robertson, D D. and of Thomas Reid, D. D. Read before the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Now collected into one volume, with some additional notes. Edinburgh: Sir William Hamilton.
44.
TieffenbachE (2010) Searle and Menger on money. Philosophy of Social Sciences40(2): 191–212.
45.
TieffenbachE (2013) Invisible-hand explanations: From blindness to lack of we-ness. Social Science Information52(3): 450–470.
46.
TurnerS P (1995) Searle’s social reality, Review essay onThe Construction of Social Reality. History and Theory38: 211–231.
47.
TuomelaR (2003) Collective acceptance: Social institutions and social reality, American Journal of Economics and Sociology62(1): 123–164.
