BinmoreK (2009) Rational Decisions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
BrandstätterHOppK-D (2013) Personality traits (‘Big Five’) and the propensity to political protest. Alternative models. Political Psychology (forthcoming).
3.
GintisH (2009) The Bounds of Reason: Game theory and the unification of the behavioral sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
HedströmP (2005) Dissecting the Social: On the principles of analytical sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
HedströmPYlikoskiP (2010) Causal mechanism in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology36: 49–67.
6.
KahnemanD (2011) Thinking. Fast and Slow. London: Allen Lane.
7.
ManzoG (2013) Is rational choice theory still a rational choice of theory?Social Science Information52(3): 361–382.
8.
OppK-D (1999) Contending conceptions of the theory of rational action. Journal of Theoretical Politics11: 171–202.
9.
OppK-D (2013a) Instrumental, axiological rationality and the explanation of norms: Cherkaoui’s (and Boudon’s) critique of rational choice theory and its ability to explain norm emergence. In: ManzoG (ed.) Paradoxes, Mechanisms, Consequences: Essays in honor of Mohamed Cherkaoui. Oxford: Bardwell Press.
10.
OppK-D (2013b) What is Analytical Sociology? Strengths and weaknesses of a new sociological research program. Social Science Information52(3): 329–3600.
11.
OppK-DBrandstätterH (2010) Political protest and personality traits: A neglected link. Mobilization15: 323–346.
12.
RikerWHOrdeshookPC (1973) An Introduction to Positive Political Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
ThalerRCSunsteinR (2009) Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. London: Penguin Books.
14.
WoodwardJ (2000) Explanation and invariance in the social sciences. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science51(1): 197–254.
15.
WoodwardJ (2003) Making Things Happen. A theory of causal explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
YlikoskiP (2013) The (hopefully) last stand of the covering-law theory: A reply to Opp. Social Science Information52(3): 383–393.