The current discourse of modernity has produced many new terms to reflect the multiple conditions of social change. However, they do not automatically suggest a direct transition from the traditional but rather support a recursive modality in which present changes are not construed as fully independent of reclaimed past beliefs and actions. By comparing these terms in relation to globality, reflexivity and multiplicity, the fate of traditions is once again given due attention through a focus on their revival and reinvention. This attention is vital for elucidating the privileging of tradition rather than its displacement in social change.
BaumanZ (2001) Community: Seeking safety in an insecure world. Cambridge: Polity.
9.
BaumanZ (2007) Consuming Life. Cambridge: Polity.
10.
BaumanZ (2008) The Art of Life. Cambridge: Polity.
11.
BeckU (1992) Risk Society: Towards a new modernity. London: SAGE.
12.
BeckU (1994) The reinvention of politics: Towards a theory of reflexive modernization. In: BeckUGiddensALashS (eds) Reflexive Modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity, 1–55.
BeckUGrandeE (2010) Varieties of second modernity: The cosmopolitan turn in social and political theory and research. British Journal of Sociology61(3): 409–443.
15.
BeckULauC (2005) Second modernity as a research agenda: Theoretical and empirical exploration in the ‘meta-change’ of modern society. British Journal of Sociology56(4): 525–557.
16.
BeckUBonssWLauC (2003) The theory of reflexive modernization: Problems, hypotheses and research programme. Theory, Culture & Society20(2): 1–33.
17.
BendixR (1967) Tradition and modernity reconsidered. Comparative Studies in Society and History9(3): 292–346.
18.
BoissevainJ (1996) Coping with Tourists. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
19.
CasanovaJ (2011) Cosmopolitanism, the clash of civilizations and multiple modernities. Current Sociology59(2): 252–267.
20.
ChangKS (2010) The second modern condition? Compressed modernity as internalized reflexive cosmopolitanization. British Journal of Sociology61(3): 444–464.
21.
DirlikA (2003) Global modernity? Modernity in an age of global capitalism. European Journal of Social Theory6(3): 275–292.
22.
DirlikA (2004) Spectres of the third world? Global modernity and the end of the three worlds. Third World Quarterly25(1): 131–148.
23.
DirlikA (2006) Global Modernity. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Press.
ElliottA (2002) Beck’s sociology of risk: A critical assessment. Sociology36(2): 293–315.
26.
FadlonJ (2004) Meridians, chakras and psycho-immuno-neurology: The dematerializing body and the domestication of alternative medicine. Body & Society10(4): 69–86.
27.
FourieE (2012) A future for the theory of multiple modernities: Insights from the new modernization theory. Social Science Information51(1): 52–69.
28.
GeertzC (1983) Local Knowledge. New York, NY: Basic Books.
29.
GibsonJW (2009) A Reenchanted World: The quest for a new kinship with nature. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
30.
GiddensA (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity.
31.
GiddensA (1994) Living in a post-traditional society. In: BeckUGiddensALashS (eds) Reflexive Modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity, 56–109.
32.
GottschalkS (2009) Hypermodern consumption and megalomania: Superlatives in commercials. Journal of Consumer Culture9(3): 307–327.
33.
GusfieldJ (1967) Tradition and modernity: Misplaced polarities in the study of social change. American Journal of Sociology72(4): 351–362.
34.
HabermasJ (1987) The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
HeelasP (1997) Detraditionalization and its rivals. In: HeelasPLashSMorrisP (eds) Detraditionalization. Oxford: Blackwell, 1–20.
36.
HobsbawmE (1983) Introduction: Inventing traditions. In: HobsbawmERangerT (eds) The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–14.
37.
HorowitzIL (1972) The Three Worlds of Development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (2nd edn)
38.
HutnykJ (2005) Hybridity. Ethnic and Racial Studies28(1): 79–102.
39.
InkelesASmithDH (1974) Becoming Modern: Individual change in six developing countries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
KoselleckR (2002) The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing history, spacing concepts. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
41.
LagerkvistA (2010) The future is here: Media, memory and futurity in Shanghai. Space & Culture13(3): 220–238.
42.
LeeRLM (2012) Global modernity and temporal multiplicity. KronoScope12(1): 31–51.
43.
LernerD (1964) The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. New York, NY: The Free Press.
PletschCE (1981) The Three Worlds, or the division of social scientific labor, circa 1950–1975. Comparative Studies in Society and History23(4): 565–590.
49.
RanderiaS (2002) Entangled histories of uneven modernities: Civil society, caste solidarities and legal pluralism in post-colonial India. In: ElkanaYKrastovIMacamoERanderiaS (eds) Unraveling Ties: From social cohesion to new practices of connectedness. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 284–311.
50.
RobertsonR (1992) Globalization: Social theory and global culture. London: Sage.
51.
RonigerLWaismanCH (2002) Globality and Multiple Modernities. Eastbourne: Sussex Academic Press.
52.
SachsenmaierDReidelJEisenstadtS (2002) Reflections on Multiple Modernities. Leiden: Brill.
53.
SchmidtVH (2010) Modernity and diversity: Reflections on the controversy between modernization theory and multiple modernists. Social Science Information49(4): 511–538.
54.
SeidmanS (1994) Contested Knowledge: Social theory in the postmodern era. Oxford: Blackwell.
55.
SpybeyT (1996) Globalization and World Society. Cambridge: Polity.
56.
TherbornG (2003) Entangled modernities. European Journal of Social Theory6(3): 293–305.
57.
TönniesF (1963) Community and Society. New York, NY: Harper.
58.
ZhaoB (1997) Consumerism, Confucianism, communism: Making sense of China today. New Left Review222: 43–59.
