There has been much controversy regarding the possibility of measuring human facts. In particular, the recourse to quantification and measurement in psychological research into human sensory capacities has been greatly criticized. In the 1940s, the American psychophysicist Stanley S. Stevens proposed a new conception of measurement that extended the field of measurable phenomena and justified the use of measurement in human and social sciences. His measurement theory is based on physicist Percy Bridgman's ideas of representation, on an operationalist epistemology, and also on a philosophy of numbers marked by logicism. This theory, which affirms that to measure is to assign numbers to objects in order to represent their empirical properties, makes it possible for Stevens to propose four levels of measurement, according to the nature of the empirical properties of the objects measured. The article describes in detail the philosophical and scientific origins of this representational theory of measurement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BAAS (British Association for the Advancement of Science) (1938) “Interim Report of the Committee Appointed to Consider and Report upon the Possibility of Quantitative Estimates of Sensory Events” , Report of the Annual Meeting, 108e année, pp. 277-334 . Londres: BAAS.
2.
BAAS (British Association for the Advancement of Science) (1940) “Quantitative Estimates of Sensory Events. Final Report” , Advancement of Science, nouvelle série, 1(2): 331-349 . Londres: BAAS .
3.
Baldwin, J. M. (1928) “Measurement”, in Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, Vol. II, pp. 57-58. New York: Macmillan .
4.
Bergson, H. (1992) “La sensation (troisième cours de psychologie au lycée Henri IV, 1892-93”, in H. Bergson Cours II. Leçons de morale, de psychologie et de métaphysique, pp. 220-227. Paris: PUF .
5.
Bergson, H. (1993) Essai sur les données immédiates de la conscience. Paris: PUF . (Première édition 1889.)
6.
Boring, E.G. (1921) “The Stimulus-Error” , American Journal of Psychology32(4): 449-471 .
7.
Boring, E.G. (1931) “The Psychologist's Circle” , Psychological Review38(2): 177-182 .
8.
Boring, E.G. (1932) “The Physiology of Consciousness” , Science75: 32-39 .
9.
Boring, E.G. (1933) The Physical Dimensions of Consciousness. New York: Dover .
10.
Boring, E.G. (1936) “Temporal Perception and Operationism” , American Journal of Psychology48(3): 519-522 .
11.
Brentano, F. (1874) Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Leipzig: Duncker und Humblot .
12.
Bridgman, P.W. (1927) The Logic of Modern Physics. New York: Macmillan .
13.
Bridgman, P.W. (1936) The Nature of Physical Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
Brown, W. et Thomson, G.H. (1921) The Essentials of Mental Measurement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
16.
Campbell, N.R. (1920) Physics: The Elements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
17.
Capshew, J.H. (1999) Psychologists on the March. Science, Practice and Professional Identity in America, 1929-1969. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
18.
Carnap, R. (1963) “Intellectual Autobiography”, in P.A. Schlipp (ed.) The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, pp. 3-84. La Salle, IL: Open Court .
19.
Coombs, C.C. (1964) A Theory of Data. New York: Wiley .
20.
Dummett, M. (1991) Les origines de la philosophie analytique. Paris: Gallimard . (Première édition allemande 1988.)
21.
Fechner, G.T. (1860) Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf. (Cité d'après l'édition anglaise, Elements of Psychophysics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston , 1966.)
22.
(Traduction partielle de l'article “Über die psychischen Massprincipien und das Weber'sche Gesetz” , Philosophische Studien [1887] 4: 161-230 .)
23.
Feigl, H. (1981) “The Wiener Kreis in America”, in R.S. Cohen (ed.) Inquiries and Provocations, pp. 57-94. Dordrecht: Reidel . (Première édition de l'article 1969.)
24.
Hornstein, G.A. (1988) “Quantifying Psychological Phenomena: Debates, Dilemmas and Implications”, in J.G. Morawski (ed.) The Rise of Experimentation in American Psychology, pp. 1-34. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press .
25.
Imbert, C. (1971) “Introduction”, in G. Frege Ecrits logiques et philosophiques, pp. 9-59. Paris: Seuil .
26.
Imbert, C. (1984) “Frege (Gottlob)”, in D. Huisman (ed.) Dictionnaire des philosophes, pp. 946-971. Paris: PUF .
27.
Israel, H. et Goldstein, B. (1944) “Operationism in Psychology” , Psychological Review51(3): 177-188 .
28.
Jacob, P. (1980) L'empirisme logique. Ses antécédents, ses critiques. Paris: Editions de Minuit .
29.
James, W. (1890) The Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt .
30.
Joergensen, J. (1951) “The Development of Logical Empiricism”, in International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. 9. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
31.
Kline, P. (2000) New Psychometrics. Science, Psychology and Measurement. London: Taylor and Francis .
32.
Kuklick, B. (1977) The Rise of American Philosophy. Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1860-1930. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press .
33.
Le Moigne, P. et Ragouet, P. (2003) La Mesure de l'humeur. Psychiatrie, statistique et société (1950-2000). Paris: CESAMES, CNRS et Université Paris-5 .
34.
McGregor, D. (1935) “Scientific Measurement and Psychology” , Psychological Review42: 246-266 .
35.
Martin, O. (1997) La mesure de l'esprit - Origines et développements de la psychométrie 1900-1950. Paris: L'Harmattan .
36.
Martin, O. (1999) “L'unité de la psychologie par l'unité des sciences: opérationnisme, physicalisme et empirisme logique au secours de la psychophysique américaine (1920-1950)” , Bulletin de Psychologie52(2): 440, 459-471 .
37.
Michell, J. (1999) Measurement in Psychology: A Critical History of a Methodological Concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
38.
Miller, G.A. (1974) “Stanley Smith Stevens: 1906-1973” , American Journal of Psychology87(1-2): 279-288 .
39.
Miller, G.A. (1975) “Stanley Smith Stevens. November 4, 1906-January 18, 1973”, in G.A. Miller Biographical Memoirs, Vol. 47, pp. 424-459. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science .
40.
Paicheler, G. (1992) L'invention de la psychologie moderne. Paris: L'Harmattan .
41.
Palmier, J.-M. (1988) Weimar en exil, tome 2: Exil en Amérique. Paris: Payot .
42.
Rogers, T.B. (1989) “Operationism in Psychology: a Discussion of Contextual Antecedents and an Historical Interpretation of its Longevity” , Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences25: 139-153 .
43.
Russell, B. (1903) Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
44.
Russell, B. (1961) Histoire de mes idées philosophiques. Paris: Gallimard . (Première édition anglaise 1959.)
45.
Russell, B. (1991) Introduction à la philosophie mathématique. Payot: Paris . (Première édition anglaise 1919, première édition traduite 1928.)
46.
Russell B. et Whitehead, A.N. (1910, 1912, 1913) Principia Mathematica, Vols 1-3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
47.
Samuelson, P. (1947) Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
48.
Soulez, A. (1992) “La diaspora du Cercle de Vienne: penser la paix”, in P. Soulez (ed.) La guerre et les philosophes de la fin des années 20 aux années 50, pp. 187-201. Saint-Denis: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes .
Stevens, S.S. (1935a) “The Operational Basis of Psychology” , American Journal of Psychology47(2): 323-330 .
51.
Stevens, S.S. (1935b) “The Operational Definition of Psychological Concepts” , Psychological Review42: 517-527 .
52.
Stevens, S.S. (1936a) “Psychology: the Propaedeutic Science” , Philosophy of Science3(1): 90-103 .
53.
Stevens, S.S. (1936b) “A Scale for the Measurement of a Psychological Magnitude: Loudness” , Psychological Review43: 405-416 .
54.
Stevens, S.S. (1939) “Psychology and the Science of Science” , Psychological Bulletin36(4): 221-263 .
55.
Stevens, S. S. (1946) “On the Theory of Scales of Measurement” , Science103(2684): 677-680 .
56.
Stevens, S.S. (1951a) “Mathematics, Measurement and Psychophysics”, in S.S. Stevens (ed.) Handbook of Experimental Psychology, pp. 1-49. New York: Wiley .
57.
Stevens, S.S., ed. (1951b) Handbook of Experimental Psychology. New York: Wiley .
58.
Stevens, S.S. (1959) “Measurement, Psychophysics and Utility”, in C.W. Churchman et P. Ratoosh (eds) Measurement: Definitions and Theories, pp. 18-63. New York: Wiley .
59.
Stevens, S.S. (1974) “S.S. Stevens”, in G. Lindzey (ed.) A History of Psychology in Autobiography, pp. 393-420. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
60.
Stevens, S.S. et Boring, E. G. (1947) “The New Harvard Psychological Laboratories” , The American Psychologist2: 239-243 .
61.
Suppes, P. and Zinnes, J.L. (1963) “Basic Measurement Theory”, in R.D. Luce, R.R. Bush and E. Galanter, Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, pp. 1-76. New York and London: Wiley .
62.
Symposium (1913) “Are the Intensity Differences of Sensation Quantitative?” , British Journal of Psychology6: Part 2.
63.
Titchener, E.B. (1905) Experimental Psychology: A Manual of Laboratory Practice, Vol. II: Quantitative Experiments. New York et Londres: Macmillan .
