The elimination of nature from social science discourse is one of the most noteworthy features of the intellectual history of the social sciences of this century. Proposals to overcome the prohibition to (re-)introduce nature into the social sciences are on the increase, and practical and theoretical justifications are offered in support of them. In this article we critically examine several sociological approaches that have attempted to respond to the ecological crisis. In the end, these approaches remain overly tied to questions of epistemology and fail to offer a satisfactory alternative. On the basis of a discussion of theories and research in the sociology of science and work on decision-making under conditions of uncertainty, we propose to develop an alternative basis for “bringing nature” into social science discourse. We explore extreme climate events to illustrate how natural phenomena appear as real, yet at the same time constructed.
Adam, B. (1994) “Running Out of Time: Global Crisis and Human Engagement”, in M. Redclift and T. Benton (eds) Social Theory and the Global Environment, pp. 92-112. London: Routledge.
Barnes, B. (1990) “Sociological Theories of Scientific Knowledge”, in R.C. Olby, G.N. Cantor, J.R.R. Christie and M.J.S. Hodge (eds) Companion to the History of Modern Science, pp. 60-73. London: Routledge.
4.
Barth, F. (1992) “Towards Greater Naturalism in Conceptualizing Societies”, in A. Kuper (ed.) Conceptualizing Society, pp. 17-33. London: Routledge.
5.
Bates, M. (1952) Where Winter Never Comes. A Study of Man and Nature in the Tropics. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
6.
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
7.
Beckerman, W. (1995) Small is Stupid - Blowing the Whistle on the Greens. London: Duckworth.
8.
Benton, T. (1993) Natural Relations. London: Verso.
9.
Berry, J.N. (1977) Lobbying for the People. The Political Behavior of Public Interest Groups. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
Canan, P. (1996) “Bringing Nature Back In: The Challenge of Environmental Sociology”, Sociological Inquiry66: 29-37.
11.
Christoff, P. (1996) “Ecological Modernisation, Ecological Modernities”, Environmental Politics5: 476-500.
Collins, H.M. (1996) “Theory Dopes: A Critique of Murphy”, Sociology30: 367-373.
14.
Dickens, P. (1996) Reconstructing Nature. London: Routledge.
15.
Douglas, M. (1982) “Cultural Bias”, in The Active Voice, pp. 183-254. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
16.
Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A. (1982) Risk and Culture. An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
17.
Dunlap, R.E. (1994) “Struggling with Human Exceptionalism: The Rise, Decline and Revitalisation of Environmental Sociology”, American Sociologist25: 5-30.
18.
Dunlap, R.E. and Catton, W.R. (1979) “Environmental Sociology”, Annual Review of Sociology5: 243-273.
19.
Durkheim, E. (1950) The Rules of the Sociological Method. New York: Free Press. (Originally published 1895.)
20.
Durkheim, E. (1951) Suicide. A Study in Sociology. New York: Free Press. (Originally published 1897.)
21.
Durkheim, E. (1964) The Division of Labour in Society. New York: Free Press. (Originally published 1893.)
22.
Eder, K. (1996) The Social Construction of Nature. London: Sage.
23.
Elias, N. (1956) “Problems on Involvement and Detachment”, British Journal of Sociology7: 226-252.
24.
Elias, N. (1986) “Über die Natur”, Merkur40: 469-481.
25.
Elias, N. (1994) The Established and the Outsiders. London: Sage.
26.
Gell-Mann, M. (1994) The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex. London: Little Brown.
27.
Goodell, R. (1977) The Visible Scientists. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
28.
Graedel, T.E. and Crutzen, P.J. (1993) Atmospheric Change: An Earth System Perspective. New York: Freeman.
29.
Grundmann, R. (1991) Marxism and Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
Grundmann, R. (1997) “Die soziologische Tradition und die natürliche Umwelt”, in S. Hradil (ed.) Differenz und Integration. Die Zukunft moderner Gesellschaften. Verhandlungen des 28. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Dresden 1996, pp. 533-550. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
31.
Grundmann, R. (1998) “The Strange Success of the Montreal Protocol: Why Reductionist Accounts Fail”, International Environmental Affairs10: 197-220.
32.
Grundmann, R. (1999) Transnationale Umweltpolitik. Der Fall der Ozonschicht. Die USA und die Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Vergleich. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
33.
Grundmann, R. and Stehr, N. (1997) “Klima and Gesellschaft, soziologische Klassiker und Außenseiter. Über Weber, Durkheim, Simmel und Sombart”, Soziale Welt47: 85-100.
34.
Haas, P.M. (1992) “Banning Chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic Community Efforts to Protect Stratospheric Ozone”, International Organization46: 187-224.
35.
Haas, P.M. , Keohane, R. and Levy, M., eds (1993) Institutions for the Earth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
Hasselmann, K. (1998) “Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Multi-Actor Strategies of Optimizing Greenhouse Gas Emissions”, in H. von Storch, E. Raschke and G. Flöser (eds) Anthropogenic Climate Change, pp. 219-269. Berlin: Springer.
37.
Hawley, A.H. (1944) “Ecology and Human Ecology”, Social Forces22: 398-405.
38.
Hays, S.P. (1987) Beauty, Health and Permanence. Environmental Politics in the United States, 1955-1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Hitzler, R. (1991) “Zur gesellschaftlichen Konstruktion von Natur”, Wechselwirkung50 (August): 43-48.
40.
Huntington, E. (1924) Civilization and Climate, 3rd edn.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Originally published 1915.)
41.
Inglehart, R. (1990) Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
Irwin, A. (1995) Citizen Science. A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. London: Routledge.
43.
Jänicke, M. (1993) “Über ökologische und politische Modernisierungen”, Zeitschrift fur Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht2: 159-175.
44.
Jasanoff, S. (1996) “Beyond Epistemology: Relativism and Engagement in the Politics of Science”, Social Studies of Science26: 393-418.
45.
Jasanoff, S. and Wynne, B. (1998) “Science and Decision Making”, in S. Rayner and E.L. Malone (eds) Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol. 1: The Societal Framework, pp. 1-87. Columbus, OH: Batelle Press.
46.
Jungermann, H. , Kasperson, R.E. and Wiedemann, P.M. (1988) Risk Communication. Jülich: Kfa Jülich.
47.
Kahnemann, D. , Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (1982) Judgement under Uncertainty. Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
Kauffman, S.A. (1993) The Origins of Order, Self-organization and Selection in Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
Kingdon, J.W. (1984) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
50.
Kuhn, T.S. (1976) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51.
Laska, S. B. (1993) “Environmental Sociology and the State of the Discipline”, Social Forces72: 1-17.
52.
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
53.
Latour, B. (1991) “Technology is Society Made Durable”, in J. Law (ed.) Power, Discretion, and Strategy, Sociological Review Monograph38: 165-191.
54.
Le Roy Ladurie, E. (1988) [1967] Times of Feast, Times of Famine. A History of Climate since the Year 1000. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
55.
Litfin, K. (1994) Ozone Discourses. Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.
56.
Luhmann, N. (1989) Ecological Communication. Cambridge: Polity Press.
57.
Luhmann, N. (1994) “Wessen Umwelt?”, in Umweltbundesamt (ed.) Wissenschaften im ökologischen Wandel, pp. 25-33. Berlin: Umweltbundesamt.
58.
Lukács, G. (1971) History and Class Consciousness. Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Originally published 1923.)
59.
Macnaghten, P. and Urry, J. (1995) “Towards a Sociology of Nature”, Sociology29: 203-220.
60.
Macnaghten, P. and Urry, J. (1998) Contested Natures. London: Sage.
61.
Martell, L. (1994) Ecology and Society. An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
62.
Mayntz, R. and Hughes, T.P., eds (1988) The Development of Large Technical Systems. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
63.
Merton, R.K. (1972) “Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge”, American Journal of Sociology78 (1): 9-47.
64.
Merton, R.K. (1973) “The Normative Structure of Science”, in R.K. Merton The Sociology of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Originally published 1942.)
65.
Murphy, R. (1994) Rationality and Nature. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
66.
Murphy, R. (1997a) Sociology and Nature. Social Action in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
67.
Murphy, R. (1997b) “On Methodological Relativism and Parochial Empiricism: A Reply to Collins”, Sociology31: 801-806.
68.
O'Connor, J. (1997) Natural Causes: Essays in Ecological Marxism. New York: Guilford Press.
69.
Ogburn, W.F. (1943) “Review of Clarence A. Mills, `Climate Makes Man' ”, American Journal of Sociology48: 784-787.
70.
Olson, M., Jr (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
71.
Park, R.E. (1936) “Human Ecology”, American Journal of Sociology62: 1-15.
72.
Prigogine, I. (1980) From Being to Becoming, Time and Complexity in the Physical Sciences. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
73.
Redclift, M. and Benton, T., eds (1994) Social Theory and the Global Environment. London: Routledge.
74.
Scott, P. , Richards, E. and Martin, B. (1990) “Captives of Controversy: The Myth of the Neutral Social Researcher”, in “Contemporary Scientific Controversies”, Science, Technology & Human Values15: 474-494.
75.
Simmel, G. (1992) Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Vol. 11: Gesamtausgabe. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (Originally published 1908.)
76.
Simon, J.L. and Kahn, H., eds (1984) The Resourceful Earth, A Response to Global 2000. Oxford: Blackwell.
77.
Sismondo, S. (1993) “Some Social Constructions”, Social Studies of Science23: 515-553.
78.
Smelser, N. (1962) Theory of Collective Behavior. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
79.
Stehr, N. (1991) “The Power of Scientific Knowledge - and its Limits”, The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology29: 460-482.
80.
Stehr, N. (1994) Knowledge Societies. London: Sage.
81.
Stehr, N. (1997) “Trust and Climate”, Climate Research8: 163-169.
82.
Stehr, N. and von Storch, H. (1999) “An Anatomy of Climate Determinism”, in H. Kaupen-Haas (ed.) Wissenschaftlicher Rassismus. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
83.
Summerton, J. , ed. (1994) The Reconfiguration of Large Technical Systems. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
84.
Touraine, A. (1981) The Voice and the Eye. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85.
Turner, S.P. and Factor, R.A. (1994) Max Weber. The Lawyer As Social Thinker. London: Routledge.
86.
van den Daele, W. (1992) “Concepts of Nature in Modern Societies and Nature as a Theme in Sociology”, in M. Dierkes and B. Biervert (eds) European Social Science in Transition. Assessment and Outlook, pp. 526-560. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
87.
Weber, M. (1911) “Discussion”, in Verhandlungen des Ersten Deutschen Soziologentages vom 13.-22. Oktober 1910 in Frankfurt am Main, pp. 151-164. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
88.
Weinstein, J. and Stehr, N. (1999) “The Power of Knowledge: Race Science, Race Policy, and the Holocaust”, Social Epistemology13: 3-36.
89.
Wilson, J.Q. (1980) “The Politics of Regulation”, in J.Q. Wilson (ed.) The Politics of Regulation, pp. 357-394. New York: Basic Books.
90.
Wirth, L. (1945) “Human Ecology”, American Journal of Sociology50: 483-488.
91.
Wynne, B. (1996) “SSK's Identity Parade: Signing-Up, Off-and-On”, Social Studies of Science26: 357-391.
92.
Yearley, S. (1991) The Green Case. A Sociology of Environmental Issues, Arguments, and Politics. London: HarperCollins.
93.
Yearley, S. (1996) Globalisation, Environmentalism, Sociology: Reinventing the Globe. London: Sage.
94.
Young, O.R. (1994) International Governance: Protecting the Environment in a Stateless Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
95.
Young, O. and Osherenko, G., eds (1993) Polar Politics. Creating International Environmental Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
