The assertion that group analysis has nothing special to offer in the field of organizational consultancy ignores Foulkes's own view that it is a powerful model for researching and understanding organizations; it also ignores the practical experiences of many of us who work in this field. It may be of interest for colleagues to hear how I have found the Group-analytic world-view invaluable for my own consultancy work. I offer here a example of Group-analytically informed organizational consultancy.
Böhm, D.
(1989) On Dialogue, David Böhm Seminars, PO Box 1452, Ojai, CA 93023.
2.
Buber, M.
(1988) The Knowledge of Man. Atlantic Heights, NJ: Humanities Press International.
3.
de Mare, P.
(1991) `Dialogue', pp. 41-74 in P. de Mareet al. (eds) Koinonia: From Hate through Dialogue to Culture in the Large Group. London: Karnac.
4.
Elias, N.
(1991) The Society of Individuals. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
5.
Foulkes, S.H.
(1990) `The Group as Matrix of the Individual's Mental Life', pp. 223-233 in E. Foulkes (ed.) Selected Papers: Psychoanalysis and Group Analysis. London: Karnac.
6.
Freud, S.
(1920) Beyond the Pleasure Principle. Standard Edition, vol. 18. London: Hogarth Press, 1955.
7.
Isaacs, W.
(1994) `Dialogue', pp. 351-364 in P. Sengeet al. (eds) The Fifth Discipline Workbook. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
8.
Mead, G.H.
(1934) Mind, Self and Society, from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviourist. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
9.
Rance, C.K.
(1998) `Organizations in the Mind: The Interaction of Organizational and Intrapsychic Perspectives', pp. 351-364 in S. Hardyet al. (eds) Occupational Stress — Personal and Professional Approaches. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes.
10.
Senge, P.M.
(1990) The Fifth Discipline — The Art and Practice of the Learning Organisation. London: Doubleday.
