This paper considers the influence of the group analyst's own self-objects on her holding capacity in the group. It describes how a therapist can, like a depressed mother, become persecuted by her group members and unable to tolerate their dependency, frustration and separateness. There are links to the intense experiences of childbirth and the early postnatal period.
Davis, M.
and Wallbridge, D. (1981) Boundary and Space: An Introduction to the work of D. W Winnicott. London: Karnac.
2.
Foulkes, S.H.
(1946) Theraputic Group Analysis. Allen and Unwin. Reprinted London: Karnac, 1984.
3.
Freud, S.
(1917) `Mourning and Melancholia', Standard Edition Vol. 14. London: Hogarth, 1957.
4.
Grotjahn, M.
(1990). `I Burned all my Records: Taking Notes about Group Sessions', Group Analysis23(1): 79.
5.
James, C.
(1994) `Holding and Containing in the Group and Society', in D. Brown and L. Zinkin (eds) The Psyche and the Social World. London: Routledge.
6.
James, J.
(1996) `The Application of Group Analysis in the Childbearing Year: The Function of Holding', Winnicott Studies. London: Hogarth Press.
7.
Kohut, H.
(1984) How Does Psychoanalysis Cure?USA: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Murray, L.
(1991) `Intersubjectivity, Object Relations Theory and Empirical Evidence from Mother-Infant Observations', Infant Mental Health.
9.
Winnicott, D.W.
(1947) `Hate and the Countertransference', in Through Paediatrics to Psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth.
10.
Winnicott, D.W.
(1964) The Child, the Family and the Outside World. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
11.
Wolf, E.
(1990) `Hollowness and Ruinous Disorders: A Process Approach to Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalytic Therapy'. Unpublished paper.
12.
Wright, K.
(1991) Vision and Separation. London: Free Association.
