Selfhood emerges from the matrix of primary relationships through the infant-care-giver dialogues. Current knowledge of early development clarifies the nature of these dialogues and confirms their significance. The Group-analytic situation is based on dialogical exchanges and in that situation it is possible to recognize and work with disturbed dialogues and exchanges. By its very nature group analysis has considerable power to facilitate the restoration of more sensitive and creative exchanges which will lead to the reemergence and transformation of Self and Self-identity.
Foulkes, A.H.
(1983) Introduction to Group-analytic Psychotherapy. London: Karnac.
2.
Freud, S.
(1905) Fragment of an Analysis of a Case of Hysteria, Standard Edition Vol 7. London: Hogarth Press, 1953.
3.
Freud, S.
(1913) Totem and Taboo, Standard Edition Vol 13. London: Hogarth Press, 1955.
4.
Holquist, M.
(1990) Dialogism, Bakhtin and his World, pp. 35-39. London, Routledge.
5.
Hutten, E.H.
(1983) `Meaning and Information in the Group Process', in M. Pines (ed.) The Evolution of Group Analysis. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
6.
Kegan, R.
(1982) The Evolving Self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Leal, R.
(1983) `Why Group Analysis Works', in M. Pines (ed.) The Evolution of Group Analysis, Ch. 12. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
8.
Morson, G.S.
(1986) `Who Speaks for Bakhtin?', in Bakhtin (ed.): Essays and Dialogues on his Work, p. 5. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
9.
Sullivan, H.S.
(1964) The Fusion of Psychiatry and Social Science. New York: W.W. Norton.
10.
Winnicott, D.W.
(1958) `The Observation of Children in a Set Situation', Through Pediatrics to Psychoanalysis, Ch. IV, p. 58. London: Hogarth.
11.
Wurmser, L.
(1981) The Mask of Shame. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
