As `Self ` is constituted through multiple Self-other interactions then we can sustain the concept as `Self as a Group'. It is argued that conversely the concept of Self can be applied to a group under particular conditions, such as a family or in group-analysis.
Beebe, B.
and Lachmann, F. (1992) `The Contributions of Mother-Infant Mutual Influence to the Origins of Self- and Object Representations', in N.J. Skolnick and S.C. Warshaw (eds) Relational Perspectives in Psychoanalysis, pp. 83-118. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
2.
Calkins, M.W.
(1930) `The Philosophical Credo of an Absolutist Personality', in G.P. Adams and W.P. Montague (eds) Contemporary American Philosophy, Vol. 1, pp. 97-218. New York: Macmillan.
3.
In T. Shapiro
and R.N. Emde (eds) Affect: Psychoanalytic Perspectives, pp. 5-44. Conn: International Universities Press.
4.
Freud, S.
(1923) The Ego and the Id. Standard Edition 19. London: Hogarth Press. Reprinted 1961.
5.
Gfäller, G.
(1993) `"Figuration": The Contribution of Norbert Elias to Group Analysis and the Contribution of Group Analysis to the Social Sciences', Group Analysis26(3): 341-356.
6.
Holquist, M.
(1990) Dialogism, Bakhtin and his World. London: Routledge.
7.
Klein, G.
(1976) Psychoanalytic Theory. New York: International Universities Press.
8.
Kohut, H.
(1971) The Analysis of the Self. New York: International Universities Press.
9.
Leal, R.
(1983) `Why Group Analysis Works', in M. Pines (ed.) The Evolution of Group Analysis. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
10.
Roberts, J.P.
(1982) `Foulkes' Concept of the Matrix', Group Analysis15(2): 111.
11.
Stem, D.
(1985) The Interpersonal World of the Infant. New York: Basic Books.
12.
Wertsch, J.V.
(1991) Voices of the Mind. A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
