Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The author reproaches Group-analytic training for not paying enough attention to the intrusion of ideological (psychoanalytic) elements into the Group-analytic approach. He considers block training to be an offshoot of the method-demonstration conference and therefore bound to adopt a particularly authoritarian structure, function and content. Reference is made to other issues of Group-analytic training and practice (the concept of the `person', the presence of patients and so on) in order to underline the difference and contradictions between group analysis and psychoanalysis. Training community practice within a Group-analytic training organization could remedy some of the problems.

Keywords

block training group analysis Group-analytic training mixed therapy groups psychoanalysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Foulkes, S.H. (1948) Introduction to Group Analytic Psychotherapy. London: Heinemann. Reprinted London: Kamac, 1983.

Foulkes, S.H. (1964) Therapeutic Group Analysis. London: Allen and Unwin. Reprinted London: Kamac, 1984.

Foulkes, S.H. (1969), `The Issue', in S.H. Foulkes and G.St. Prince (eds), Psychiatry in a Changing Society. London: Tavistock Publications.

Foulkes, S.H. (1975) Group Analytic Psychotherapy. Method and Principles. London: Gordon and Breach. Reprinted London: Karnac, 1986.

Grotjahn, M. (1987) My Favourite Patient: The Memoirs of a Psychoanalyst. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Hilpert, H. (1995). `The Place of the Training Group Analyst and the Problem of Personal Group Analysis in Block Training'. Group Analysis 28 (3): 301-311.

Island, Th.-K. (1993) `Sitting at the Trainer's Table. Boundaries and Barriers within a Block Training Community', paper given at 9th European Symposium in Group Analysis, Heidelberg.

Obholzer, K. (1982) The Wolf Man Sixty Years Later. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Pines, M. (1986) `Coherency and its Disruption in the Development of the Self', British Journal of Psychotherapy 2(3): 180-185.

10.

Pines, M. (1991) `The Matrix of Group Analysis: Historical Perspective', Group Analysis 24(2): 99-109.

11.

Roberts, J. (1991) `A History of Group Analytic-Practice', in J. Roberts and M. Pines (eds) The Practice of Group Analysis, pp. 104-106. London: Routledge.

12.

Roberts, J. and Pines, M. (1992) `Group Analytic Psychotherapy', International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 42(4): 469-494.

13.

Skynner, R. (1989) Institutes and How to Survive Them. Mental Health Training and Consultation. London: Methuen.

14.

Tsegos, Y.K. (1993a) `Strength, Power and Group Analysis', Group Analysis 26(2): 131-137.

15.

Tsegos, I.K. (1993b) `The Neccessity of an Enemy', paper given at 9th European Symposium in Group Analysis, Heidelberg.

16.

Tsegos, I.K. and Karaolidou, M. (1993) `How to Abstain... via Contact', paper given at 9th European Symposium in Group Analysis, Heidelberg.

17.

Tsegos, Y.K. (1995) `A Greek Model of Supervision. The Matrix as Supervisor A Version of Peer Supervision Developed at IGA (Athens)', in M. Sharpe (ed.) The Third Eye: Supervision of Analytic Groups, pp. 117-129. London: Routledge.

Further Thoughts on Group-Analytic Training

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References