This article describes the place of the training group analyst in a block training scheme. It stresses that the training institute is an outstanding and inestimable transference object, which thrusts itself into the relationship between training group and group conductor. The article discusses the dynamics of the system `group-conductor-institute' with its effects on the transference/countertransference field, the boundaries and the principle of abstinence.
Bosse, Hans
(1982) `Defence Alliances. From Anxiety to Method in the Analytic Group', Group Analysis15(1): 24-37.
2.
Cremerius, Johannes
(1989) `Lehranalyse und Macht. Die Umfunktionierung einer Lehr-Lem-Methode zum Machtinstrument der institutionellen Psychoanalyse', Forum Psychoanalyse5: 190-223.
3.
Hearst, Lisbeth E.
(1990) `Transference, Countertransference and Projective Processes in Training Course Block Sessions', Group Analysis23(4): 341-346.
4.
Knauss, Werner
and Rudnitzki, Gerhard (1990) `Block Training in Heidelberg: Historical and Contemporary Influences', Group Analysis23(4): 367-375.
5.
Ohhmeier, Dieter
(1979) `Bemerkungen zur gruppenanalytischen Anwendung der Psychoanalyse', in H. Fischle-Carl (ed.) Theorie und Praxis der Psychoanalyse, pp. 146-160Fellbach: Adolf Benz Verlag.
6.
Reik, Herta
(1992) `Die Bedeutung von Grenzen in der gruppenanalytischen Ausbildung und Psychotherapie', Gruppenanalyse1: 39-35 1.
7.
Wolff, Eike
(1988) `Spaltungsabwehr in der Gruppe', in D. von Ritter-Rohr (ed.) Gruppenalalytische Exkurse pp. 36-48. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
