After having described communicational and relational characteristics of dreaming and sharing dreams, in Part II, I provide deeper exploration of a clinical example in group-analytic group therapy, describing group work with a dream. The uniqueness of the group-analytic approach to the dream’s contents and its communicative aspect will be stressed. Requests for containment preoccupy relations and participants and should be elaborated during the discourse of ‘dreamtelling’.
Artemidorus of Daldia (2nd Century A.C.)The Interpretation of Dreams, translated by WhiteRJ. Park Ridge, NJ, 1975.
2.
EliasN (1939) The Civilizing Process. New York: Urizen Books, 1978.
3.
FoulkesSH (1948) Introduction to Group Analytic Psychotherapy. London: Karnac, 1983.
4.
FoulkesSHAnthonyEJ (1957) Group Psychotherapy: The Psychoanalytic Approach. Second Edition. London: Karnac.
5.
FoulkesSH (1973) The group as matrix of the individual’s mental life. In: FoulkesE (ed.) Selected Papers. London: Karnac, pp. 223–234.
6.
FoulkesSH (1975) Group Analytic Psychotherapy: Methods and Principles. London: Karnac.
7.
FriedmanR (2002) Dream-telling as a Request for containment in Group therapy. The Royal Road through the Other. In: PinesNeri and Friedman (eds) Dreams in Group Psychotherapy. London: JKP, pp. 46–67.
FriedmanR (2007) Where to look? Supervising Group Analysis—A Relations Disorder Perspective. Group Analysis40(2): 251–268.
10.
FriedmanR (2015) Using the Transpersonal in Dream-telling and Conflicts. Group Analysis48(1): 45–60.
11.
FriedmanR (2018a) Beyond rejection, glory and the Soldier’s Matrix: the heart of my group analysis. Group Analysis51(4): 1–17.
12.
FriedmanR (2018b) The Soldier Matrix and Other Psychoanalytic Traits on the Relationship of Individual and Group. Psychosozial-Verlag. Giessen
13.
FriedmanRSeidlerC (2022) Über Beziehungen mit Autoritäten in der Gruppenanalyse. Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik58: 327–343.
14.
FriedmanR (2024) Dreamtelling: The value of dreaming and sharing dreams in relations. Part I: From collective preoccupations to shared dreaming. Group Analysis.
15.
KaesR (2002) 'The Polyphonic Texture of Intersubjectivity in the Dream', in Neri PinesFriedman (eds) Dreams in Group PsychotherapyLondon: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 67–78.
16.
MannheimK (1940) Mensch und Gesellschaft im Zeitalter des Umbaus. Bad Homburg, Berlin, Zürich: Dr. Max Gehlen, 1967.
17.
MiesT (2022) Personal communication.
18.
NitzgenD (2010) Hidden Legacies: S.H. Foulkes, Kurt Goldstein, and Ernst Cassirer. Group Analysis43(3): 354–371.
19.
NitzgenDHopperE (2017) The concepts of the social unconscious and of the matrix in the work of S.H. Foulkes. In:HopperEWeinbergH (eds) The Social Unconscious in Persons, Groups and Societies: Volume 3: The Foundation Matrix Extended and Re-Configured. London: Karnac.
20.
OgdenTH (1996) Reconsidering three aspects of psychoanalytic technique. International Journal of Psychoanalysis77(5): 883–900.
21.
RamO (1997) The comparison of different themes and aggressive patterns as appearing in dreams and free play of four-to-six-year-old children. Unpublished thesis, University of Haifa.
22.
SchutzW (1966) The Interpersonal Underworld. San Francisco: Science and Behavior Books.
23.
SeidlerCJaenickeCFriedmanR (2018) Intersubjectivity as Common Ground: An approximation between matrix and intersubjective field. Group Analysis28(1): 3–31.
24.
QuinodozJM (1999) Dreams that turn over a page. Integration dreams with paradoxical regressive content. International Journal of Psychoanalysis80: 225–238.
