Further thoughts on “‘If you prick me do I not bleed?”: Antisemitism,racism and group analysis - some thoughts.’ A response to Bacha,Einhorn and Lieberman
Restricted accessReplyFirst published online December, 2021
Further thoughts on “‘If you prick me do I not bleed?”: Antisemitism,racism and group analysis - some thoughts.’ A response to Bacha,Einhorn and Lieberman
This article adds to the timely and important argument presented by Bacha, Einhorn and Lieberman (2021): we may all have blind spots in relation to our own racism – and to our own antisemitism. Some antisemitic tropes are repeated so often that they begin to be accepted, unquestioningly, by those who do not consider themselves antisemitic.
ArendtH (1963) Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Viking Press.
2.
BachaCEinhornSLiebermanS (2021) ‘If you prick me, do I not bleed?’: Antisemitism, racism and group analysis—some thoughts. Group Analysis. 54(3): 388–401
Bledin (2004) What’s in a name? Foulkes, identity and the social unconscious. Group Analysis37(4): 477–489.
5.
BushS (2021) Using the language of ‘white privilege’ dooms Baddiel’s case. The Times Saturday Review, 6February, 13.
6.
Equality and Human Rights Commission (2020) Investigation into antisemitism in the Labour Party. Available at: https://www.equalityhumanrights.com. Accessed 18 April 2021.
7.
ForrestANayakS (2021) ‘Should I stay or should I go?’ Group analytic training: inhabiting the threshold of ambivalence is a matter of power, privilege and position. Group Analysis54(1): 55–68.
8.
FoulkesSH (1975) Group Analytic Psychotherapy. Method and Principles. London: Karnac, 1986.
ParfittT (2020) Hybrid Hate. Conflations of Antisemitism and Anti-Black Racism from the Renaissance to the Third Reich. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
SandsP (2020) The Ratline. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
14.
SchlapoberskyJ R (2016) From the Couch to the Circle. London and New York: Routledge.
