By our theories, techniques, personality, and spontaneous behaviour, we define how group relationships, and experiences are to be regarded, and the emotional depth to which exchanges may be considered. In a three-part series, I present an overview of my approach to relationally based group psychotherapy. I assume that the need for ‘truth’, that is, emotional meaning is primary organizer of group formation and process. Individuals and groups cycle through an interactive interplay of mental states, both to seek and avoid truth seeking,
Topics introduced in Part I include a brief introduction to relational theory and its historical foundation; the efficacy of combined-individual psychotherapy; the centrality and activity of the therapist; and the description of some key foundational concepts: ‘G’ (urge to group), emotional truth and falsity, interplay of mental categories, basic affects (Bion’s LHK), and passion.
BionW.R. (l962) Learning From Experience. London: Heinemann. [Reprinted in: Seven Servants: Four works by Wilfred R. Bion. New York: Aronson, l977].
6.
BionW.R. (1963) Elements of Psychoanalysis. London: Heinemann. [Reprinted in: Seven Servants: Four works by Wilfred R. Bion. New York: Aronson, l977].
7.
BlakeW. (1977) ‘Auguries of Innocence (Poems from the Pickering manuscript)’, in OstrikerA. (ed.) The Complete Poems. London: Penguin Classics.
8.
BrombergP. (2009) ‘Multiple Self States, the Relational Mind, and Dissociation: A Psychoanalytic Perspective’, in DellP.F.O’NeillJ.A. (eds) Dissociation and the Dissociative Disorders: DSM and Beyond, pp. 637–52. New York: Routledge.
9.
DaviesJ. (1999) ‘Dissociation, Therapeutic Enactment and Transference-Countertransference Process’, Gender and Psychoanalysis2: 241–59.
10.
EinsteinA. (1922) The Meaning of Relativity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.
11.
EriksonE.H. (1966) ‘Ontogeny of Ritualization’, in LowensteinR.M.NewmanL.M.SchurM.SolnitA.J. (eds) A General Psychology, pp. 601–22. New York: International Universities Press.
12.
FreudS. (1914) ‘On the History of the Psycho-analytic Movement’, S. E. 14, pp. 3–66.
13.
FreudS. (1921) ‘Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego’, S. E. 18, pp. 67–143.
GrotsteinJ. (1999) ‘Projective Identification Reassessed: Commentary on Papers by Stephen Seligman and by Robin C. Silverman and Alicia F. Lieberman’, Psychoanalytic Dialogues9: 187–203.
19.
HabermasJ. (1987) Theory of Communicative Action Volume Two: Liveworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Translated by McCarthyT.A.Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press, 1981.
20.
HobdellR. (1991) ‘Individual and Group Therapy Combined’, in RobertsJ.PinesM. (eds) The Practice of Group Analysis, pp. 136–47. London: Tavistock/Routledge.
21.
HoffmanI. (1983) ‘The Patient as Interpreter of the Analyst’s Experience’, Contemporary Psychoanalysis19: 389–422.
22.
HoffmanI.Z. (1994) ‘Dialectical thinking and therapeutic action in the psychoanalytic process’, Psychoanalytic Quarterly63: 187–218.
23.
KiteJ.V. (2008) ‘Ideas of Influence: The Impact of the Analyst’s Character on the Analysis’, Psychoanalytic. Quarterly77: 1075–104.
24.
KleinM. (1952) ‘Some Theoretical Conclusions Regarding the Emotional Life of the Infant’, in Envy and Gratitude, pp. 61–93. New York: Delacorte Press, 1975.
25.
MitchellS. (1988) Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis: An Integration. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
26.
MitchellS. (1993) Hope and Dread in Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
27.
O’LearyJ.WrightF. (2005) ‘Social Constructivism and the Group-as-a-Whole’, Group29: 257–76.
28.
RackerH. (1968) Transference and Countertransference. Madison: CT: International Universities Press.
29.
RenikO. (1993) ‘Analytic Interaction: Conceptualizing Technique in Light of the Analyst’s Irreducible Subjectivity’, Psychoanalytic Quarterly62: 553–71.
30.
SchwartzH. (2012). ‘Intersubjectivity and Dialecticism’, International Journal of Psychoanalysis93: 401–25.
31.
StolorowR.D. (1997) ‘Principles of Dynamic Systems, Intersubjectivity, and the Obsolete Distinction Between One-Person and Two-Person Psychologies’, Psychoanalytic Dialogues7: 859–68.
