In this response I will bring the historical roots of the modern individualism and Norbert Elias conceptualizations on Homo Clausus and Homines Aperti—also introducing as Agamben’s discussion on Homo Sacer and other forms of human and societal prejudice and exclusion—to criticize contemporary individualism and discuss the challenges for group analysis in the 21st-century. I build on Haim Weinberg’s concerns on ‘Impossible groups that Flourish in Leaking Containers’ to highlight the importance of ‘total situations’ and ‘applied’ group analysis, since 1948 Foulkes tenets until the current group analytic new challenges.
AdornoT. (1947) ‘Educação após Auschwitz’ [Education after Auschwitz] in Palavras e sinais: modelos críticos 2. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1995, pp. 104–123.
2.
AgambenG. (1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford University Press.
3.
AgambenG. (2003) State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
AhlinG. (1996) Exploring Psychotherapy Groups Cultures. Essay on Group Theory and the development of Matrix Representation Grid. An observation method for studying therapeutic group processes. Stockholm: Kongl Carolinska Medico Chirurgiska Institutet.
5.
AkhtarS. (2014) Sources of Suffering. London: Karnac.
6.
AlizadeA.M. (2002) ‘El rigor y el Encuadre Interno’ [Rigor and the Internal Frame], Revista Uruguaya de Psicoanalisis96: 13–16.
7.
AmitranoG. (2013) ‘O paradoxo do Homo Sacer: Entre o Abandono e o Bando’ [The Paradox of the Homo Sacer: in between the abandonment and the band], Cadernos de Ética e Filosofia Política23: 78–92.
8.
AnzieuD. (1984) The Group and the Unconscious. London: Routledge.
9.
AnzieuD. (1995) The Skin Ego. Translation of Naomi Segal. London: Karnac, 2016.
10.
ArendtH. (1948) The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harvest, 1966.
11.
ArendtH. (1958) A Condição Humana [The Human Condition]. São Paulo: Forense Universitária, 2007.
12.
BarangerMBarangerW. (1962) ‘The analytic situation as a dynamic field’, The International Journal of Psychoanalysis89: 795–826, 2008.
BaumanZ. (2001) Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World. Cambridge: Polity.
15.
BenjaminW. (1940) On the Concept of History. New York: Classic Books America, 2009.
16.
BlackwellD. (2014) ‘ Response to Elisabeth Rohr’s Foulkes’, Group Analysis47(4): 384–391.
17.
BlegerJ. (1967) ‘Psycho-analysis of the Psycho-Analytic Frame’, International Journal of Psycho-Analysis48: 511–19.
18.
BourdieuP. (1999) Acts of Resistance: Against the Tyranny of the Market. New York: New Press.
19.
BobbioN. (1979) O Problema da Guerra e as Vias da Paz. [The Problem of the War and the Roads to Peace]. São Paulo: UNESP.
20.
BrownD.ZinkinL. (1994) (eds) The Psyche and The Social World. London: Jessica Kingsley.
21.
ButlerJ. (2005) Taking Account of Oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.
22.
CanettiE. (1960) Crowds and Power. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1984.
23.
CortesãoE.L (1969) Grupanálise—Teoria e Técnica. [Group Analysis: Theory and Technique]. Lisbon: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
24.
DalalF. (1998) Taking The Group Seriously: Towards a Post-Foulkesian Group Analytic Theory. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1998.
25.
de MaréP.PiperR.ThompsonS. (1991) Koinonia: From Hate through to Dialogue, to Culture in the Large Group. London: Karnac.
26.
DeleuzeG. (1993) The Fold. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2006.
27.
EhrenbergA. (2010) The Weariness of the Self: Diagnosing the History of Depression in the Contemporary Age. Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
28.
EliasN. (1970) Introdução à Sociologia [What is Sociology?]. Biblioteca 70. Lisbon: Edições70, 2005.
29.
EliasN. (1987) A Sociedade dos Indivíduos [The Society of Individuals]. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 1994.
30.
FigueiredoL.C. (1996) A invenção do psicológico: quatro séculos de subjetivação 1500/1900 [The Psychological’s Invention: Four Centuries of Subjectivity 1500/1900]. São Paulo: Escuta.
31.
FoulkesS.H. (1948) Introduction to Group Analytic Psychotherapy. Reprinted London: Karnac, 1983.
32.
FoulkesS.H. (1964) Therapeutic Group Analysis. Reprinted London: Karnac, 1984.
33.
FoulkesS.H. (1975) Group Analytic Psychotherapy: Methods and Principles. Gordon and Breach. Reprinted London: Karnac, 1986.
34.
FoucaultM. (1979) Microfísica do Poder. [Microphysics of Power]. Rio de Janeiro: Graal.
35.
FoucaultM. (1997) Il Fault Defender la Societé: Cours au Collège de France, 1975–176. Paris : Seuil, 1997.
36.
FreidmanR. (2015) ‘A Soldier’s Matrix: A Group Analytic View of Societies in War’, Group Analysis48(3): 239–257.
FreudS. (1919) ‘The Uncanny’, S.E.17, pp. 217–56. London: Hogarth.
39.
FroshS. (2002) ‘The Other’, American Imago59(4): 389–407.
40.
FroshS. (2011) ‘The Relational Ethics of Conflict and Identity’, Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society16(3): 225–43.
41.
GilJ. (1997) Metamorfoses do Corpo. [Metamorphosis of the Body] Lisbon: Relógio D’Água.
42.
HarrisonT. (2000) Bion, Rickman, Foulkes and the Northfield Experiments: Advancing on a Different Front. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
43.
HopperE. (2003) Traumatic Experience in The Unconscious Life of Groups: the Fourth Basic Assumption: Incohesion: Aggregation/Massification. London: J. Kingsley.
44.
HopperE. (2012) Trauma and Organizations. London: Karnac.
45.
HopperE. (2015) ‘“Groups” and “Gangs” in Group Analysis: The Importance of the Sociological Perspective. “The Social Unconscious” and the Inner City: Gangs and Communities’, IGA Study Day (unpublished article).
46.
HopperE.WeinbergH. (2011) The Social Unconscious in Persons, Groups and Societies vol. 1. Mainly Theory. London: Karnac.
47.
HopperE.WeinbergH. (2016) The Social Unconscious in Persons, Groups and Societies vol. 2. Foundation Matrices. London: Karnac.
48.
KreegerL. (1975) The Large Group: Dynamics and Therapy. London: Karnac Books.
49.
LaschC. (1979) Culture of Narcissism. Warner Books Edition: New York, 1990.
50.
LawrenceG.BainA.GouldJ. (1996) ‘The Fifth Basic Assumption’, in LawrenceG. (2000) Tongued with Fire: Groups in Experience. London: Karnac Books.
51.
LevinasE. (1961) ‘Transcendence as the Idea of Infinity’, in Totality and Infinity. An Essay on Exteriority. Springer Science and Business Media, 1979.
52.
MaffesoliM. (1995) The Time of the Tribes: The Decline of Individualism in Mass Society. London: Sage.
53.
MbembeA. (2003) ‘Necropolitics’, Public Culture15(1): 11–40.
MojovicM.PennaC.ScanlonC.TjeltaS. (2016) ‘Psycho-Social Dialogues: Inner and Outer spaces in Organizations, Neighbourhoods and Communities’, Conference, Belgrade.
56.
MojovicM. (2011) ‘Manifestations of Psychic Retreats in Social Systems’, in HopperE.WeinbergH. (eds) The Social Unconscious in Persons, Groups and Societies vol.1 Mainly Theory, pp. 209–32. London: Karnac Books.
57.
MojovicM. (2015) ‘The Matrix Disrupted. Challenges and Changes’, Group Analysis48(4): 540–56.
58.
MoscoviciS. (1981) La era de las multitudes: um tratado histórico de psicología de las masas. México: Fondo de Cultura Econômica, 1985.
59.
NitsunM. (1996) The Anti-group: Destructive Forces in The Group and Their Creative Potential. London: Routledge.
60.
NitzgenD. (2008) ‘Development by Adaption. Notes on “Applied Group Analysis”‘, Group Analysis41(3): 240–51.
61.
OgdenT. (1994) Subjects of Analysis. London: Karnac.
62.
OrmayT. (2012) The Social Nature of Persons. London: Karnac.
63.
OrtegaY Gasset (1926) The Revolt of the Masses. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1994.
64.
PennaC. (2007) ‘Corpo e subjetividade na obra de José Gil: aproximações com o setting analítico’ [Body and Subjectivity in José Gil’s work: approximations with the analytic setting] (unpublished article).
65.
PennaC. (2014a) Inconsciente Social. [Social Unconscious]. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo.
66.
PennaC. (2014b) ‘Psicanálise em Extensão, Psicanálise em Contexto: Intervenções Psicossociais em Sociedades Traumatizadas’ [Psychoanalysis in Extension, Psychoanalysis in Context: Psycho-social Interventions in Traumatized Societies]. Trieb/IPA13(2): 15–31.
67.
Pichon Rivière (1971) O processo grupal [The Group Process]. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1980.
68.
PinesM. (1983) The Evolution of Group-Analysis. London: Jessica Kingsley.
69.
PinesM. (1988) Circular Reflections: Selected Papers on Group Analysis and Psychoanalysis. London: Jessica Kingsley.
70.
RohrE. (2014) ‘Intimacy and Social Suffering in a Globalized World ‘[38th Foulkes Annual Lecture]’, Group Analysis47(4): 365–83.
71.
ScanlonC. (2015) ‘On the perversity of an Imagined Psychological Solution to very real Social Problems of Unemployment (Work-lessness) and Social Exclusion (Worth-lessnees): A Group Analytic Critique’, Group Analysis48(1): 31–44.
72.
ScanlonC.AdlamJ. (2010) ‘The Recovery Model or the modelling of a cover-up? On the creeping privatization and individualization of dis-ease and being-unwell-ness’, Groupwork20(3): 110–14.
73.
SchmittC. (1934) Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. University of Chicago Press, 2005.
74.
ScholzR. (2014) ‘(Foundation-) Matrix Reloaded—Some Remarks on a Useful Concept and its Pitfalls’, Group Analysis47(3): 201–12.
75.
SennettR. (1974) The Fall of the Public Man. New York: Knof, 1977.
76.
SimmelL.G. (1957) ‘Freedom and the individual (1902)’ in LevineD. (ed.) On Individuality and Social Forms: Selected Writings. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1971.
77.
StandingG. (2011) The precariat: the new dangerous class. New York: Bloomsbury.
78.
TönniesF. (1963) Community and Society. New York: Harper.
79.
Tubert-OklanderJ. (2007) ‘The Whole and The Parts: Working in the Analytic Field’, Psychoanalytic Dialogues17(1): 115–32.
80.
Tubert-OklanderJ. (2013) The One and The Many: Selected Papers on Relational Analysis and on Group Analysis. London: Karnac.
TurquetPierre. (1975) ‘Threats to identity in the large group’, in KreegerL. (ed.) The Large Group, pp. 87–114. London: Constable.
83.
WeinbergH. (2014) The Paradox of the Internet Groups. Alone in The Presence of Virtual Others. London: Karnac.
84.
WeinbergH. (2016) ‘ Impossible Groups that Flourish in Leaking Containers—Challenging Group Analytic Theory [40th Annual Foulkes Lecture]’, Group Analysis49(4): 330–349.
