Group analysis as a discourse of knowledge has much to offer how we construct homosexuality. Yet despite this rich background, group analysis has been slow to construct a clear theory of psychosexuality, and specifically homosexuality. The aim of this article therefore is to consolidate and expand current conceptions of sexuality, through an exploration of homosexuality within group analytic theory using ideas such as discourse analysis, desire, jouissance, the Other and the role of language in the matrix of the group. The article proposes a number of urgent research questions for group analysts around experiences of differing sexualities in a therapeutic group.
BachaC. (2005) ‘Commentary on “Queer Theory” by Katherine Watson’, Group Analysis38(1): 81–5.
2.
BurmanE. (2002) ‘Gender, Sexuality and Power in Groups’, Group Analysis35(4): 540–59.
3.
BurmanE. (2005a) ‘Contemporary Feminist Contributions to Debates around Gender and Sexuality: From Identity to Performance’, Group Analysis38(1): 17–30.
4.
BurmanE. (2005b) ‘Group Analysis Special Issue New Currents in Contemporary Social Theory and Implications for Group-Analytic Theory and Practice’, Group Analysis38(1): 7–16.
5.
BurmanE. (2007) ‘Commentary: Knowing Silences or the Epistemology of the Closet? Commentary on Article by Martin Weegmannn, “Group Analysis and Homosexuality: Indifference or Hostility?”‘, Group Analysis40(1): 77–82.
6.
BurmanE. (2009) ‘On Linking Lacan and Foulkes: Commentary on Dieter Nitzgen’s “The Location of Sexuality in Group Analysis”‘, Group Analysis42(3): 229–32.
7.
BurmanE. (2012) ‘Group Acts and Missed Encounter: Lacan and Foulkes’, Lacunae1(2): 23–42.
DalalF. (1998) ‘Foulkes’, in Taking the group seriously: towards a post-Foulksian group analytic theory, pp. 33–75. London: Jessica Kingsley publishers.
