The article firstly questions the possible relationship between group analysis and philosophy. It then discusses the Foulkesean ‘ethics’ of leadership and its roots in Freudian psychoanalysis and the European Enlightenment. In this context, Foulkes’ group analytic conception of the superego and his view that the group members ‘collectively’ constitute the norm from which ‘individually’, they deviate being (re-)considered. Building on this ‘Law of Group Dynamics’, it is argued that the particular kind of experience allowed for in and by group psychotherapy is one of ‘moral intimacy’, a concept borrowed from the Swiss philosopher and novelist Peter Bieri. Ending on a note on aesthetics, some aspects of the relation between imagination and social-historical creation are being elucidated.
AckermanN. (1945) Some Theoretical Aspects of Group Psychotherapy. Group Psychotherapy (A Symposium). New York: Beacon House.
2.
AllouchJ. (1995/2011) ‘Erotics of Mourning in the times of dry death’, in CliftonL. (ed.) Lacanian Psychoanalytic Writings. Invention in the Real (Papers of the Freudian School of Melbourne) pp. 245–62. London: Karnac, 2012.
3.
ApollonW. (2010) ‘The Limit. A Fundamental Question for the Subject in Human Experience’, in: Konturen III, pp. 103–18. Oregon, OR: Oregon Digital.
4.
BieriP. (2011) Wie wollen wir leben?St. Pölten: Residenz Verlag.
5.
BrownD. (1998) ‘Foulkes’ basic law of group dynamics 50 years on. Abnormality, injustice, and the renewal of ethics [22nd Foulkes Annual Lecture]’, Group analysis31(4): 391–419.
6.
CampbellJ. (2010) ‘The Islands of the Blest: Group Analysts and their Groups [34th Annual Foulkes Lecture]’, Group Analysis43(4): 413–32.
7.
CastoriadisC. (1991) Philosophy, Politics, Autonomy, Ames CurtisD. (ed.) New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
CastoriadisC. (1996) Imaginary and imagination at the crossroads, in CastoriadisC. (ed.) Figures of the Thinkable, pp. 71–90. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
CastoriadisC. (1997) Complexité, magmas, histoire. L’exemple de la ville medieval, in CastoriadisC. (ed.) Faits and à faire. Les carrefours du labyrinthe V, pp. 209–225. Paris: Seuil.
10.
CohnH. (1996) ‘The Philosophy of S.H. Foulkes. Existential–Phenomenological Aspects of group analysis’, Group analysis29: 287–302.
11.
de MaréP.PiperR.ThompsonS. (1991) Koinonia. From Hate, through Dialogue, to Culture in the Large Group. London: Karnac.
12.
EliasN. (1937) The Civilizing Process: The History of Manners. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978.
13.
FuchsS.H. (1936) ‘Zum Stand der heutigen Biologie. Dargestellt in Kurt Goldstein: der Aufbau des Organismus’, Imago. Zeitschrift Für Psychoanalytische Psychologie. Ihre Grenzgebiete Und Anwendungen (22): 21–241. An abridged version entitled ‘Biology in the Light of the Work of Kurt Goldstein’ appeared in Foulkes, S.H. (1990), pp. 39–56.
14.
FoulkesS.H. (1943) ‘Psycho-analysis And Crime’, Canadian Bar Review22, S. 22–61. Reprinted in RadzinowiczL.TurnerJ.W.C. (eds) English Studies in Criminal Science, Pamphlet 7, Department of Criminal Science, Faculty of Law, Cambridge: University of Cambridge, 1944.
15.
FoulkesS.H. (1948) Introduction to Group Analytic Psychotherapy. London: Karnac, 1983.
16.
FoulkesS.H. (1964) Therapeutic Group Analysis. London: Karnac, 1984.
17.
FoulkesS.H. (1975) Group Analytic Psychotherapy. Methods and Principles. London: Maresfield Library.
GoldsteinK. (1934) Der Aufbau des Organismus. Einführung in die Biologie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Erfahrungen mit kranken Menschen, HoffmannTh.Stahnisch TübingenF.W. (eds) 2014: W. Fink Verlag. Reprint of the original edition from 1934.
25.
GoldsteinK. (1934) The Organism. A Holistic Approach to Biology Derived from Pathological Data in Man. New York: American Book Co. 1939.
26.
GoldsteinK. (1940) Human Nature in the light of Psychopathology. New York, 1947: Schocken. Reprinted Cambridge, 1951.
KernbergO.F. (1992) ‘Mass psychology through the Analytic Lens’, in Kernberg, O.F. Ideology, Conflict, and Leadership in Groups and Organizations, pp. 36–50. New Haven and London1998: Yale University Press.
33.
Klein, (1935) ‘A contribution to the psychogenesis of manic depressive States’, in Contributions to Psycho-Analysis 1921–1945, pp. 236–50. London: Hogarth, 1968.
34.
KrisE. (1952) Psychoanalytic Explorations in Art. New York: International Universities Press.
35.
LacanJ. (1949) The mirror stage as formative of the function of the I transl. SheridanA. in Jacques Lacan, Ecrits: A Selection, pp. 1–7. London: Tavistock, 1977.
36.
LacanJ. (1953) The function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis transl. Sheridan in Jacques LacanA., Ecrits: A Selection, pp.30–113. London: Tavistock, 1977.
37.
LaplancheJ. (1987) New Foundations for Psychoanalysis, transl. by Macey.D.London: Blackwell, 1989.
38.
LürßenE. (1993) ‘Reinszenierung eines massiven Traumas. Leitmotive im Leben Friedrichs des Großen’, in Gutwinski-JegleJ. u.RotmannM. (eds) ‘Die klugen Sinne pflegend’, Psychoanalytischeund kulturkritische Beiträge. Hermann Beland zu Ehren, pp. 414–33. Tübingen: Edition Diskord.
39.
MercierP. (2004) Nachtzug nach Lissabon. München: Hanser Verlag.
40.
MeltzerD. (1988) The Apprehension of Beauty. The Role Of Aesthetic Conflict In The Development Of Art And Violence. Strath Tay: Clunie Press.
41.
Money-KyrleR. (1952) ‘Psycho-Analysis and Ethics’, IJPA33: 225–34.
42.
Money-KyrleR. (1961) Man’s Picture of his World. London: Duckworth.
43.
PisaniR. (2014) A comparison between the art of conducting in group analysis and the art of conducting an orchestra. Newsletter of the Group-Analytic Society International64: 33–45.
44.
SennettR. (1974) The Fall of Public Man. New York: A. Knopf, 1977.
45.
WinnicottD.W. (1951) ‘Transitional Objects and transitional phenomena’, in Playing and Reality, pp. 1–25. New York: Basic Books, 1971.
46.
VolkanV. (1999) Das Versagen der Diplomatie: Zur Psychoanalyse Nationaler, Ethnischer und Religiöser Konflikte. (The Failure of Diplomacy: The Psychoanalysis of National, Ethnic and Religious Conflicts.) Giessen: Psychosozial-Verlag.
47.
WeegmannM. (2014) The World Within. Developing Theory For Group Analysis. London: Karnac.
