Response to Elisabeth Rohr’s Foulkes Lecture

Akomfrah J. (2012) The Unfinished Conversation. (Film/video). New Art Exchange.

Azu-Okeke O. (2003) ‘Response to Lecture by Dick Blackwell’, Group Analysis 36(4): 465–76.

Bateson G. (1979) Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. London: Wildwood House.

Blackwell D. (2003) ‘Colonialism and Globalization: A Group Analytic Perspective [27th Foulkes Annual Lecture]’, Group Analysis 36(4): 445–62.

Blauner R. Wellman D. (1973) ‘Towards the Decolonisation of Social Research’, in Ladner J. (ed.) The Death of White Sociology: Essays on Race and Culture. NY: Random House.

Blum W. (2003) Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions since World War II. Monroe: Common Courage Press.

Campbell J. (2010) ‘Islands of the Blest [34th Foulkes Annual Lecture]’, Group Analysis 43(4): 413–32.

Dalal F. (1998) Taking the Group Seriously: Towards a Post-Foulkesian Group Analytic Theory. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.

Dalal F. (2014) ‘Ethics versus Compliance. The Institution, Ethical Psychotherapy in Practice, (and Me)’, Group Analysis 47(1): 62–81.

Fanon F. (1965) The Wretched of the Earth. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books.

Ladner J. (ed.) The Death of White Sociology: Essays on Race and Culture. NY: Random House.

Marquez G.G. (1967) One Hundred Years of Solitude. London: Penguin, 2007.

Marx K. Engels F. (1848) The Manifesto of the Communist Party. NY: Penguin, 1998.

Marx K , 1852, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In, Tucker R ed, The Marx Engels Reader, New York: W W Norton, 1978

Negri A. Hardt M. (2000) Empire. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: Harvard University Press.

Rohr E. (2014) ‘Intimacy and Social Suffering in a Globalized World [38th Foulkes Annual Lecture]’, Group Analysis 47(4): 365–83.

Rutherford J. (1990) Identity: Community, Culture and Difference. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

Sartre J-P. (1963) Search for a Method. NY: Alfred Knopf Inc.

Tjelta S. (2012) ‘The Iso-Type: The Panoptic Zeal, the Uncanny, and the Seeds of a New Social Character’, Group Analysis 45(2): 169–87.