The article focuses on the discrepancy between the success of Foulkes as an author and the predicament of his work today. Introduced by some preliminary remarks on the notion of intersubjectivity, his change of name from Siegmund Heinrich Fuchs to S.H. Foulkes is discussed as formative for the development of his professional creativity. It is argued that talking about Foulkes as an author, the particular circumstances of his writing cannot be ignored as they influenced the predicament of his written work and continue to do so. With regard to these, it is maintained that although Foulkes as a person never got lost in translation, as an author he is in danger of being so today. As a conclusion, a plea is made if not for the Collective Works of S.H. Foulkes but at least for a commented (re-) edition of them.
BionW.R. (1961) Experiences in Groups. London: Tavistock.
3.
BledinK. (2004) ‘What’s in a Name? Foulkes, Identity and the Social Unconscious’, Group Analysis37(4): 477–89.
4.
BrownD. (1998) ‘Foulkes Basic Law of Group Dynamics Fifty Years On: Abnormality, Injustice and the Renewal of Ethics [22nd Foulkes Lecture]’, Group Analysis31(4): 391–417.
5.
BrownD.ZinkinL. (1994) ‘Introduction’, in BrownD.ZinkinL. (eds) The Psyche And The Social World. Developments in Group Analytic Theory, pp. 202–11. London and New York: Routledge.
6.
CassirerE. (1923) The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Volume 1: Language, translated by MannheimR.New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953.
7.
CassirerE. (1925) Language and Thought, translated by LangerS.K.New York and London: Harper and Bros, 1946.
8.
CassirerE. (1925) The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Volume 2: Mythical Thought, translated by MannheimR.New Haven: Yale University Press, 1955.
9.
CassirerE. (1929) The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Volume 3: Phenomenology of Knowledge, translated by MannheimR.New Haven: Yale University Press, 1957.
10.
FoulkesS.H. (1930) ‘Observations in the Significance of the Name in a Schizophrenic’ in FoulkesS.H. (1990) Selected Papers, pp. 31–7. London: Karnac.
11.
FoulkesS.H. (1936) ‘Zum Stand der heutigen Biologie. Dargestellt in Kurt Goldstein: der Aufbau des Organismus’ in Imago. Zeitschrift Für Psychoanalytische Psychologie. Ihre Grenzgebiete Und Anwendungen (22): 21–241. An abridged version entitled ‘Biology in the Light of the Work of Kurt Goldstein’ appears in Foulkes, S.H. (1990) Selected Papers, pp. 39–56. London: Karnac.
12.
FoulkesS.H. (1937) ‘On Introjection’, International Journal of. Psycho-Analysis18(S): 269–83. Reprinted in Foulkes, S.H. (1990) Selected Papers, pp. 57–78. London: Karnac.
13.
FoulkesS.H. (1943) ‘Psycho-analysis And Crime’, Canadian Bar Review22(S): 22–61. Reprinted in L. Radzinowicz and J.W.C. Turner (eds) (1944) English Studies in Criminal Science, Pamphlet 7, Department of Criminal Science, Faculty of Law. Cambridge: University of Cambridge. Also ‘Psychoanalyse und Verbrechen’, translated by T. Kluttig, K. Hoffman and D. Nitzgen in Forum der Psychoanalyse 2013: 85–113.
14.
FoulkesS.H. (1946a) ‘On Group Analysis’, International Journal of Psychoanalysis (27): 46–51. Also in Foulkes, S.H. (1990) Selected Papers, pp. 127–36. London: Karnac.
15.
FoulkesS.H. (1948) Introduction to Group Analytic Psychotherapy. London: Karnac, 1983.
16.
FoulkesS.H. (1950) ‘Group Therapy: Survey, Orientation, Classification’, in FoulkesS.H. (1984) Therapeutic Group Analysis, pp. 47–53. German translation in FoulkesS.H.Gruppenanalytische Psychotherapie, pp. 63–70, 1974.
17.
FoulkesS.H. (1957) ‘Psychodynamic Processes in the Light of Psycho-Analysis and Group Analysis’, in FoulkesS.H. (1984) Therapeutic Group Analysis, pp. 108–19. London: Karnac.
18.
FoulkesS.H. (1960) ‘Application of Group Concepts To The Treatment Of The Individual In The Group’, in FoulkesS.H. (1984) Therapeutic Group Analysis, pp. 155–69. London: Karnac.
19.
FoulkesS.H. (1961) ‘Psychotherapy in the “Sixties”’, in FoulkesS.H. (1984) Therapeutic Group Analysis, pp. 135–54. London: Karnac.
20.
FoulkesS.H. (1964) Therapeutic Group Analysis. London: Karnac, 1984.
21.
FoulkesS.H. (1966) ‘Some basic concepts in group psychotherapy’, in FoulkesS.H. (1990) Selected Papers, pp. 151–8. London: Karnac.
22.
FoulkesS.H. (1971) ‘Access to unconscious processes in groups’, in FoulkesS.H. (1990) Selected Papers, pp. 209–22. London: Karnac.
23.
FoulkesS.H. (1973) ‘The group as matrix of the individual’s mental life’, in FoulkesS.H. (1990) Selected Papers, pp. 223–34. London: Karnac.
24.
FoulkesS.H. (1975) Group-Analytic Psychotherapy: Methods and Principles. London: Gordon and Breach. Reprinted London: Karnac, 1984.
FoulkesE.FoulkesS.H. (1990) ‘A brief Memoir’, in FoulkesS.H. (1990) Selected Papers, pp. 3–20.
27.
FoulkesS.H.LewisE. (1944) ‘Group Analysis: Studies in the treatment of groups on psycho-analytical lines’, British Journal of Medical Psychology (20): 175–84. Reprinted Foulkes, S.H. (1984) Therapeutic Group Analysis, pp. 20–37. London: Karnac.
28.
FoulkesS.H.AnthonyE.J. (1957) Group Psychotherapy. The Psychoanalytical Approach. Second Edition. London, 1965. Reprinted London: Karnac, 1984.
29.
FreudS. (1900) Interpretation of Dreams. Standard Edition. London: Hogarth Press.
30.
FreudS. (1909b) ‘Analysis of a Phobia in a Five-Year-Old Boy’, SE 10, pp. 33ff.
31.
FreudS. (1918b) ‘From the history of an infantile neurosis’, SE 3, p. 3.
32.
FreudS. (1920g) ‘Beyond the Pleasure Principle’, SE 18, p. 3.
33.
FreudS. (1923a) ‘Psychoanalysis and Libido theory’, SE 18, p. 233.
34.
FreudS. (1923b) ‘The Ego and the Id’, SE 19, p. 3.
35.
GelbA.GoldsteinK. (1918) ‘Zur Psychologie des optischen Wahrnehmungs- und Erkennungsvorgangs (Psychologische Analysise hirnpathologischer Fälle aufgrund von Untersuchungen Hirnverletzter Ztschr.f.d. Ges’, Neurolgie u. Physiologie41: 1–143. Republished in Sourcebook of Gestalt Psychology, transl. W.D. Ellis (1938), pp. 315–25. London.
36.
GoldsteinK. (1934) The Organism. A Holistic Approach to Biology Derived from Pathological Data in Man. New York: American Book Co., 1939. German: Der Aufbau des Organismus. Den Haag: Nijhoff, 1934.
37.
HoffmannK.NitzgenD. (2014) Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik50(2): 92–110. Göttingen VandenhoeckRuprecht.
38.
KristevaJ. (1979) ‘Il n’y a pas de maitre à langage’, in Regards sur la psychanalyse en France. Special issue of Nouvelle Revue de la psychanalyse20: 119–40.
39.
JayM. (1973) The Dialectical Imagination. A History of the Frankfurt School am the Institute of Social Research 1923–1950. Boston and Toronto: Little Brown.
40.
LacanJ. (1956–65) Le Séminaire. Livre IV. La relation d’Objet, 1956–57MillerJacques Alain (ed.). Paris: Seuil, 1994.
41.
NitzgenD. (2008a) ‘Development by Adaptation. Notes on “applied” Group Analysis’, Group Analysis41(3): 240–51.
42.
Nitzgen, (2008b) ‘The Group Analytic Moment Sixty Years on: Revisiting Introduction to Group Analytic Psychotherapy by S.H. Foulkes [32nd Foulkes Lecture]’, Group analysis41(4): 319–40.
43.
NitzgenD. (2010) ‘Hidden Legacies. E.H. Foulkes, Kurt Goldstein and Ernst Cassirer’, Group analysis43(3): 354–71.
44.
NitzgenD. (2013) ‘Symboltheoretische Perspektiven der Gruppenanaylse’, in MiesT.NitzgenD. (eds) Symbolbegriff und Symboltheorie in Psychoanalyse und Gruppenanalyse. Psychosozial131: 19–42. Giessen. Psychosozial Verlag.
45.
OrmayT. (2013) ‘One Person is No Person [37th Foulkes Lecture]’, Group Analysis46(4): 344–68.
46.
PraxJ. (2008) Le ‘petit Hans’ et sa famille: données historiques et biographique. www.fort-da.org.
