The authors address unanswered questions about the attraction of the often stormy large group and the interplay between it and small groups. If the large group is a place that arouses many difficult feelings, why do people in conferences, workshops, training programmes and on the Internet continue to participate in them? The authors found that within Internet large groups there was a clear pattern of setting up a small, intimate core group. They found a similar pattern in two live, group workshops. The authors learned that large and small groups are intricately related, and that when participants have the chance, they choose to continue in an on-going, back-and-forth movement between each.
BarakA.Wander-SchwartzM. (2000) ‘Empirical Evaluation of Brief Group Therapy Conducted in an Internet Chat Room’, Journal of Virtual Environments5(1).
2.
BionW.R. (1961) Experiences in Groups. London: Tavistock.
3.
DavidsonB. (1998) ‘The Internet and the Large Group’, Group Analysis31(4): 457–71.
4.
de MareP. (1989) ‘The History of Large Group Phenomena in Relation to Group Analytic Psychotherapy: The Story of the Median Group’, Group13: 3–4.
5.
EcksteinM.H. (1975) ‘Case Study and Theory in Political Science’, in GreensteinF.J.PolskyN.W. (eds) Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 7, pp. 79–137. Reading Ma: Addison Wesley.
6.
FoulkesS.H. (1964) Therapeutic Group Analysis. New York: International Universities Press Inc.
7.
FoulkesS.H. (1990) ‘Group dynamic processes and group analysis’, in Selected Papers: Psychoanalysis and Group Analysis. London: Karnac Books.
8.
FoulkesS.H.AnthonyE.J. (1984) Group Psychotherapy: The Psychoanalytical Approach. London: Karnac Books Ltd, Maresfield Reprints.
9.
HareP. (1976) Handbook of Small Group Research. New York: The Free Press, Macmillan.
10.
HynesA. (2002) ‘The Internet and the Large Group: Technological Possibilities in a New Age’, Group Analysis35(1): 153–64.
11.
KreegerL. (ed.) (1975) The Large Group: Dynamics and Therapy. London: Constable.
12.
NitsunM. (1996) The Anti-Group—Destructive forces in the group and their creative potential. The International Library of Group Psychotherapy and Group Process. London and New York: Routledge.
13.
PinesM. (1998) Circular Reflections, Selected Papers on Group Analysis and Psychoanalysis. International Library of Group Analysis. London, Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.
14.
RippaB. (2004) In Search for Intimacy in the Large Group. Paper presented at the Mediterranean Regional Congress of Group Psychotherapy, Athens.
15.
SchneiderS.WeinbergH. (2003) The Large Group Revisited, International Library of Group Analysis 25. London, New York: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
16.
SempseyJ.J.III(1997) ‘Psyber Psychology: A Literature Review Pertaining to the Psycho/Social Aspects of Multi-User Dimensions in Cyberspace’, Journal of Virtual Environments2(1).
17.
SempseyJ.J.III (1998) ‘The Therapeutic Potentials of Text-Based Virtual Reality’, Journal of Virtual Environments3(2).
18.
SempseyJ.J.IIIJohnstonD.A. (2000) ‘The Psychological Dynamics and Social Climate of Text-based Virtual Reality’, Journal of Virtual Environments5(1).
19.
SpringmannR. (1974) ‘The Application of Interpretations in Large Group’, The International Journal of Group Psychotherapy24(2).
20.
TowellJ.TowellE. (1997) ‘Presence in Text-based Networked Virtual Environments of “MUDS”’, Presence6(5): 590–95.
21.
WeinbergH. (2002) ‘Community unconscious on the Internet’, Group Analysis35(1): 165–83.
22.
WeinbergH. (2003) ‘The Large Group in a Virtual Environment’, in SchneiderS.WeinbergH.The Large Group Revisited, International Library of Group Analysis 25. London, New York: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
23.
YalomI.D. (1985) The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
