The Islands of the Blest or Fahrenheit 451. Response to Lecture by Jane Campbell

Abstract

To live on the Islands of the Blest means that the dwellers do not grow old or die but live an eternal life in a world closed and separated from the rest of the world. Is this what has happened to group analysis? Has it happened to us as group analysts? Has it happened to our groups? If this is so and we want to change it, what are we to do? Could it be that the myth might show us, I wonder? I emphasize the need for critical reflection and possible refinement of group analytic thinking and practice, as well as proper research to support this, and the need for us as group analytic societies and as practitioners to dare to take on authority marketing group analytic psychotherapy as a relevant and valuable choice of treatment. If not we may end up like the small group trying to make the culture of books and reading survive in Fahrenheit 451, the film by Truffaut. That is to me an image of desperation, anxiety and sorrow, not eternal bliss.

Keywords

group analysis democracy authority evidenced-based research social responsibility

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ballhausen-Scharff, B. and Rudnitzki, G. ( 2000) ‘The Group Conductor and Group Research-Ethical, Conceptual and Technical Problems,’ Group Analysis 33(4): 469-83.

Behr, H. ( 2008) ‘Education about Group Analysis is as Important as Research: Response to "From Freud to Foulkes to the Future"’, Group Analysis 41(1): 53-9.

Campbell, J. ( 2010) ‘The Islands of the Blest’, Group Analysis 43(4): 413-32.

Fahrenheit 451 (1966) Director: François Truffaut. Distributed by Universal.

Fonagy, P. and Target, M. ( 1996) ‘Playing with Reality I’, International Journal of Psychoanalysis 77(2): 217-33.

Foulkes, S.H. ( 1948[1983]) Introduction to Group-Analytic Psychotherapy, Studies in the Social Integration of the Individuals and Groups. London: Maresfield Reprints.

Foulkes, S.H. ( 1975) Group-Analytic Psychotherapy, Method and Principles. London. Gordon and Breach.

Foulkes, S.H. and Anthony, E.J. ( 1965) Group Psychotherapy The Psycho-analytic Approach. Second Edition. London: Penguin.

Friedman, R. ( 2007) ‘Where to Look? Supervising Group Analysis-A Relations Disorder Perspective’, Group Analysis 40(2): 251-68.

10.

Hakeem, A. ( 2008) ‘From Freud to Foulkes to the Future: The Development of Group Analysis and its Continual Evolution’, Group Analysis 41(1): 40-52.

11.

Hopper, E. ( 2008) ‘Response to "From Freud to Foulkes to the Future"’ , Group Analysis 41(1): 60-2.

12.

Lorentzen, S. ( 2003) ‘Long-term Analytic Group Psychotherapy with Outpatients, Evaluation of Process and Change’, doctoral dissertation. University of Oslo, Norway.

13.

Lykkeberg, R. ( 2010) ‘Hvis Demokrati Bliver Problemet’ (‘If Democracy Becomes the Problem’), Information, 24-25 April, p. 4.

14.

Karterud, S. ( 2001) ‘Group Analysis in the Age of Evidenced-based Psychology/ Psychiatry-Commentary on "Research as an Extended Group Phenomenon: Is ‘Hard Science’ a Sexual Metaphor?" by Chris Evans’, Group Analysis 34(2): 312-16.

15.

Knauss, W. ( 2000) ‘S.H. Foulkes Annual Lecture: President’s Introduction. Group Analysis 33(4): 435-7.

16.

Mandag Morgen ( 2010) Velfærdens iværksættere.

17.

Nitsun, M. (2009) ‘Authority and Revolt: The Challenges of Group Leadership [33rd Foulkes Annual Lecture]’, Group Analysis 42(4): 325-48.

18.

Tschuschke, V. ( 2001) ‘Research in Psychoanalysis and Group Analysis: "Sexual Metaphors" versus Unconscious "Fantasies of Grandiosity"? A Reply and Commentary to Article by Chris Evans’, Group Analysis 34(2): 317-27.

19.

American Group Psychotherapy Association (AGPA) Science to Service Task Force (2007) Practice Guidelines for Group Psychotherapy. New York. Available online at: www.AGPA.org.