In the course of my professional evolution as an individual therapist, I often had
the experience of supervision in a group. Sometimes it was individual supervision in
the presence of a group. Usually it was an occasion for group members to take part
in a clinical discussion of the case presented, where one can certainly learn much
from listening and reacting to another therapist at work. However, group process was
not employed for the purposes of supervision — and the group process is
the focus of this article.
Altfeld, D.A.
and
Bernard, H.S.
(1999) `
Experiential Group Psychotherapy Supervision'
, Group23:
1—17
.
2.
Berman, A.
and
Berger, M.
(2007) `
Matrix and Reverie in Supervision Groups'
, Group Analysis40(2):
236—50
.
3.
Berman, A.
,
Berger, M.
and
Toren, I.
(2000) `Unconcious Reconstruction in Theater'.
Unpublished paper.
4.
Joseph, B.
(1985) `
Transference: The Total Situation'
, International Journal of Psycho-Analysis66:
447—54
.
5.
Keinan, N.
(2004) `
Whose Therapy is It
?', Paper presented at workshop in conference organized by IAPP
(Israel Association for Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy) on
`Patient, Supervisee, Supervisor — Processes in Training'
, in Tel Aviv , Israel.
