This article explores different ways of thinking about the group-analytic concept of the individual as social through and through. One explanation is based on object relations theory and regards the individual as social because the individual psyche is an `internal world' of representations of social relationships. The article argues that this represents a Kantian `both/and' way of thinking. Another approach is based on Mead and this suggests that the individual is social through and through because individual mind is the same process of bodily action as the social. This represents a dialectical mode of thinking derived from Hegel.
Brown, D.
(1994) `Self-Development through Subjective Interaction: A Fresh Look at Ego Training in Action?, in D. Brown and L. Zinkin (eds) The Psyche and the Social World: Developments in Group-Analytic Theory. London: Routledge.
2.
Elias, N.
(1989) The Symbol Theory. London: Sage.
3.
Foulkes, S.H.
(1948) Introduction to Group-Analytic Psychotherapy. London: William Heinemann Medical Books Limited.
4.
Foulkes, S.H.
(1964) Therapeutic Group Analysis. London: George Allen and Unwin.
5.
Foulkes, S.H.
(1971) `Access to Unconscious Processes in the Group-Analytic Group', in S.H. Foulkes Selected Papers: Psychoanalysis and Group Analysis (ed. E. Foulkes), London: Karnac, 1990.
6.
Foulkes, S.H.
(1973) `The Group as Matrix of the Individual's Mental Life', in S.H. Foulkes Selected Papers: Psychoanalysis and Group Analysis (ed. E. Foulkes). London: Karnac, 1990.
7.
Freeman, W.J.
(1995) Societies of Brains: A Study in the Neuroscience of Love and Hate. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Gordon, R.
(1991) `Intersubjectivity and the Efficacy of Group Psychotherapy', Group Analysis24(1): 41-51.
9.
Translated by A.V. Miller, (1977) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
Kant, I.
(1790) Critique of Judgement, trans. W.S. Pluhar. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1987.
11.
Kelso, J.A. Scott
(1995) Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
Leader, D.
(2000) Freud's Footnotes. London: Faber and Faber.
13.
Maturana, H.
and Varela, F.J. (1992) The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Boston, MA: Shambhala.
14.
Mead, G.H.
(1934) Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Merleau-Ponty, M.
(1976) The Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
16.
Stacey, R.
(2001) Complex Responsive Processes in Organizations: Learning and Knowledge Creation. London: Routledge.
17.
Stacey, R.
, Griffin, D. and Shaw, P. (2001) Complexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking?London: Routledge.
18.
Stem, D.N.
(1985) The Interpersonal World of the Infant. New York: Basic Books.
19.
Stem, D.N.
(1995) The Motherhood Constellation: A Unified View of Parent-Infant Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
20.
Stolorow, R.
, Atwood, G. and Brandchaft, B. (1994) The Intersubjective Perspective. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
