The need for a drive theory in group analysis and psychoanalysis is argued for; especially against the background of recent advances in genetics. The old drive theories were not adequate and created confusion on several levels. With the application of the social drive a direct understanding of our social nature becomes possible. A discrete social function of the personality is proposed. It supports the Foulkesian view of people.
Brown, D.G.
(1987) `Change in the Group-Analytic Setting', Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy3(1).
2.
Ferenczi, S.
(1924) Thalassa: A Theory of Genitality. New York: Norton, 1968.
3.
Foulkes, S.H.
(1964) Therapeutic Group Analysis. London: George Allen and Unwin.
4.
Freud, S.
(1921) Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. Standard Edition, vol. 18. London and New York: Hogarth, 1959.
5.
Grunberger, B.
(1989) New Essays on Narcissism. London: Free Association Books.
6.
Hopper, E.
(1997) `21st Foulkes Annual Lecture, "Traumatic Experience in the Unconscious Life of Groups. A Fourth Basic Assumption"', Group Analysis30(4): 439-470.
7.
Kohut, H.
(1971) Analysis of the Self. Madison, CT: International Universities Press Inc.
8.
Ormay, A.P.
(1991) `Instinctual Foundations of Group Analysis', Free Associations Volume 2, part 4.
9.
Pines, M.
(1986) `Psychoanalysis, Psychodrama, and Group Psychotherapy: Step-Children of Vienna', Group Analysis19(2) 101-112.
10.
Wilson, E.O.
(1975) Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Harvard, MA: Belknap.
